May 6, 2025 • 31 mins
The John Kobylt Show Hour 2 (05/06) - Jay Beeber comes on the show to talk about the fact that more red light and speed cameras could be coming to California. Pres. Trump calls out Gov. Newsom and high-speed rail. Gov. Newsom left out one big detail when talking about California's population increase.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Can't.
Speaker 2 (00:00):
I am six forty. You're listening to the John Cobelt
Podcast on the iHeartRadio app. If you miss any part
of the show, you go to the iHeartRadio app after
four o'clock and listen to the podcast version John Cobelt
Show on demand, same as the radio show. And we
opened with a complete rundown of the big news of
(00:23):
the day. The Democrats in the Assembly, the perverts, pedophiles
and predators have reversed course and they are going to
vote to make it an automatic felony if you buy
sex from a sixteen or seventeen year old, it's an
automatic felony and you'll go to prison. And they tried
(00:44):
every trick, but the blowback was so intense. Carl Demyo
is going to come on in an hour after three
o'clock to tell us what happened to cause this abrupt turnaround.
They still ought to be put on the sex registry list, though,
just for free considering this other things that the Democratic
(01:05):
legislature is doing to us. In the Senate Judiciary Committee,
there's been a hearing. There's been a hearing on a
bill and it's called Senate Bill seven twenty and it's this.
This is this is the one for wait, wait, which
(01:26):
one is this? Because I got two? I got two
bills here. Oh, this is the the red light cameras. Okay,
this is the red light cameras. And then there's another
bill about setting up permanent speed limit zones near schools.
So we're going to talk to Jay Bieber, executive director
of the National Motorist Association. Here. We'll start first with
(01:48):
the red light camera bill. Jay, how are you always good?
Speaker 3 (01:52):
To be with you? Unfortunately, it's always when the government
is trying to screw us over.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
Yeah, I mean, there's so many ways that they're trying
to do it. I got confused here, But let let's
let's do the red light camera bill first. This is
send It Bill seven twenty. What's this supposed to do?
Speaker 3 (02:10):
Okay, well, if you remember back in twenty thirteen, we
fought a bill AB six sixty six, which we called
the Devil's Bill, and that bill was doing to do
basically the same thing this bill would do, which would
be it would take away your right to a trial
for a red light camera ticket. It would make it
a civil violation, so the owner of the vehicle would
be responsible, not the driver. And the ticket itself would
(02:33):
be the only evidence that they would have to present
against you, and the hearing officer who works for the
city that gave you the ticket is the one that
would decide your fate, and he and that person has
to buy law assume that the ticket itself is correct
when you walk in the door, So you have to
prove your your innocence as opposed to them having to
(02:54):
prove your guilt. The only thing they have to present
is a picture of your license plate and the thing
that says you ran the redl So this is basically
just a way to take your money. Now they reduce
the fine, but they want to expand red light cameras
everywhere because it will make it a much much more
profitable for cities to run this because they get to
keep one hundred percent of the money.
Speaker 2 (03:15):
Red light cameras were a thing years ago, and in
La County none of them work anymore, or if they work,
it's not enforced.
Speaker 3 (03:24):
Ye judgmen, Yeah, we got room in La and a
whole bunch of other cities.
Speaker 2 (03:28):
There's still some around. But why is it making a
comeback if this thing died over ten years ago?
Speaker 3 (03:36):
Because these anti car folks. These are the same people
that ran this HLA ballot initiative, and which are those
complete streets people, the bike and ped folks that want
road diets everywhere and everybody to ride a bicycle. They
wrote this bill in cahoots with the red light camera
companies and they and they want one hundred So the
(04:00):
bill puts one hundred percent of the money to their
pet projects like road diets and all of these other
things that they want the fund the road diet right exactly.
So this is this is this bill is one hundred
percent about money. Has nothing to do with safety because
we already have red light cameras in the state. So
though it doesn't like give any additional authority to do
(04:21):
anything or whatever, but it just makes it easier for
them to take your money, to take away or do
process rights. You don't have the right to You don't
have a right to have an attorney. You don't have
the right to have discovery of any evidence against you.
You don't You can't confront any witnesses. Nobody has to
show up to UH to prosecute the ticket, Like no
(04:42):
police officer has to show up and say you know
what you did, Let.
Speaker 2 (04:45):
Me ask you some of the court, how is this
constitutional where you're guilty until proven innocent and you don't
even have the right to a trial. Well, and you
might not even be in the car when this happened,
because this goes to the owner, not the drugt This
doesn't all this seems like it would get thrown out
of court in about five minutes.
Speaker 3 (05:07):
Well, the way they do it is they by the
swipe of a pen. They say, oh, it's not a
criminal thing anymore. We're just going to make it a
civil violation. And under the civil rules we can do
all this kind of stuff about people may or may
not know the difference between civil court and criminal court.
But criminal court there's a much higher standard, and there's
all these rules of evidence and all this kind of stuff.
A civil court is supposed to be Like you and
(05:27):
I have a dispute about money, a contract, whatever, we
go to court. The court decides, you know, who's right
or who's wrong. It's not supposed to be for when
the government comes after you, because the government has all
the power. But by making this a civil case, they
get to throw out all of the rights that you
have and make it and make the government have all
(05:49):
the power, and of course you know they have all
the power walking in the door anyway. So it's just
a way to take your money is more easily, and
then put it the money to do that project.
Speaker 2 (05:59):
Red light cameras. What stops the government from taking photos
of every car that comes through the intersection and then
send you the summons and say, hey, you went through
the red light. And actually they're taking photos of people
who went through green lights. Nothing stops them, nothing stops them,
and they get under this will they get away with
it because you have to prove that you actually went
(06:21):
through a green light, and there's no way you could do.
Speaker 3 (06:23):
That right, or that it was still yellow, or that
the yellow light was was set properly, or any of
the things. I've been an expert witness in a number
of cases having to do with yellow lights. I have
one coming up next week in the city of Hawthorne.
And with this change, there would be no such thing
as an expert witness coming in and you know, defending
you and and proving that the government did what would
(06:45):
did the wrong thing.
Speaker 2 (06:46):
What is with these these these these bike people and
these pedestrian.
Speaker 3 (06:50):
Greens cars, what the hit cars and people who drive well, why.
Speaker 2 (06:53):
Don't they leave the country. Why don't they go live
on an island somewhere, Why don't they go to the moon?
I don't understand this. How do you It's been your
entire life devoted to hating everybody else's car. Hell is wrong.
Mental patients they are.
Speaker 3 (07:09):
And I've had conversations with these people, and basically they say, well,
why do you want all these people to die? Don't
you care about the crisis that's happening on our roadways
and all this kind of stuffing. Pedestrians and bicyclists are dying.
By the way, I'll just give you two interesting statistics
about bicyclists and pedestrians dying with red light with red
light running. So in the entire state of California last
(07:31):
year in twenty twenty four, there were exactly two bicyclists
who died with a driver running running a red light. Now,
of course, those were probably somebody who was drunk anyway,
or any of that kind of stuff.
Speaker 2 (07:41):
People who get run over are drunk or or they're
homeless people. I think they're drugs.
Speaker 3 (07:46):
But okay, but here here's the other part. The number
of people who number of bicyclists who died when the
bicyclist ran the red light was nine, So five times
five times as much as the bicyclists running the red light,
not people in cars run the r like.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
The why, Well, you know what, I think we got
to get an organization of banned bicyclists from the roadway.
How about that?
Speaker 3 (08:05):
I agree, I completely agree. Their answer is let's let's
ban cars. That's that's their answer.
Speaker 2 (08:11):
Okay. You know what, There's all kinds of crazy people
in the world. Right, There's people who believe Eltis is alive,
they believe in aliens, they believe the earth is flat. Right,
there's a certain number are crazy for any number of issues.
How do they get so much influence in the legislature?
Maybe I answered my own question.
Speaker 4 (08:31):
Exactly.
Speaker 3 (08:31):
The crazy people are talking about the crazy people. But
you know, but here's the thing. They come in with
this idea and they tell these legislators who know nothing, okay,
and you explain it, and they say, oh, you know,
all these people are dying and twenty five percent of
fatalities in the state, or people who are running red lights.
Of course it's two point five percent, you know. So
they lie to them, They tell them all these stories
(08:54):
and if it and of course I'm talking about the
other bill, if it has anything to do with children
and protecting children, all fall online because nobody wants this,
you know, to be said that they don't care about children.
And so let me say that the analysis on these
bills have been terrible. They said these are bad ideas.
We have engineers who have written in and said these
(09:15):
are bad ideas, and they all vow for them. Anyway,
because because there's people have to understand how the legislature works.
There is actually no real debate for the most part
about most things. It's just how do we feel about
stuff when the person walks in the door, and maybe
there's a grieving parent of somebody that got killed in.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
So emotional manipulation. Can you hang on for another segment?
Speaker 3 (09:37):
Absolutely?
Speaker 1 (09:38):
All right?
Speaker 2 (09:38):
Can we have even gotten to the school zone new
school zone law that they want to pass. H. JB.
Beran with the National Motorists Association red light cameras and
the bill that they want to pass in the legislature
would make you automatically guilty. You'd have to prove your innocence.
You wouldn't get a court trial. It's a civil case.
(09:59):
And it's the ticket goes to the owner, not the driver.
We got more to say on this trip.
Speaker 5 (10:07):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI A
M six forty.
Speaker 2 (10:13):
We continue with j Biber from the National Motorists Association.
Last segment. If you didn't hear you ought to catch that.
On the podcast, we talked about red light cameras. They're
they're coming back if this bill passes in Sacramento, and
it's going to make it harder to avoid paying the
(10:34):
fine because you're presumed guilty and you have to prove
your innocence, but you don't get a court trial. You
end up with an administrative civil process, and you're guilty
if you're the owner, even if you weren't the one driving.
Now there's a second bill, and this is about expanding
the school zone concept. Let's get Jay Biber on National
(10:57):
Motors Association. Jay, what's this one about? This is Assembly
Bill three eighty two.
Speaker 3 (11:03):
Yeah, Assembly Bill three eighty two by Mark Berman from
the Bay Area. This bill would make school zones essentially
twenty four to seven twenty miles an hour on every roadway.
The way school zones work currently is that it's only
supposed to be a reduction in speed when the kids
are going to and from school, So you know, in
(11:23):
the morning when they're you know, all the kids are
going to school, and in the evening, you know, in
the afternoon when they're leaving school, that's when the school
zone is supposed to be in effect because that's when
you have to slow down for the kids. And so
this same group, by the way, it's the same group
behind this. They want school zones to be twenty miles
an hour, twenty four to seven. The city could just
(11:43):
put up a sign and say twenty four seven school zone.
Why if Why Because here's why. Because they believe in
this concept that twenty is plenty, which is people should
never go above twenty miles an hour lest they hit
a pedestrian or bicyclist.
Speaker 2 (11:57):
Twenty twenty the extent of their intellect, of their cleverness
is a rhyme, a child's rhyme.
Speaker 3 (12:06):
Right, and it's all over the world. Okay, So it's
starting in Europe, of course, and so they can't get
twenty mile an hour speed limits under the current laws.
So they're using the school zone as an excuse to
set this up. So school zones which would probably be
overlapping because it's five hundred feet of any place on
(12:27):
the school property. Okay, so the edge of the school
property five hundred feet from that, five hundred feet from
the other side of the school property, so we're talking about,
you know, half a mile quarter mile distance, and then
they would be overlapping. So you would get all of
these twenty mile an hour zones, and you would have
to know that somebody who is under eighteen is walking
somewhere within five hundred feet of the school, maybe not
(12:49):
even where you can see them. The speed limit would
drop to twenty miles an hour and you would be guilty.
And then they can put up speed cameras because of
the speed camera program that's starting in the state, they
can they can put up speed cameras to ticket you
for doing that.
Speaker 2 (13:04):
So they're going to create these phony twenty mile an
hour zones and then they're gonna put up speed cameras.
Speaker 3 (13:09):
That's exactly right, that's exactly right. It's four they put
up cops and to ticket you whenever two o'clock in
the morning when school and it specifically says school does
not have to be in session, and.
Speaker 2 (13:19):
It's just to steal all the money, right, there's no
other purpose. This has nothing to do with safety, it's.
Speaker 3 (13:25):
No, we have not either with safety. In fact, it
makes school zones less safe because if it's twenty four
seven whenever, people are not gonna pay attention to them
when kids are actually going to and from school, so
it's actually worse for kids. And again, this is about
two things. It's about money, and it's about penalizing you
for getting in your car and driving somewhere. That's what
it's about. And again I talked to these people and
(13:47):
I said, well, why don't you make it twenty miles
an hour so if a kid is walking past the
seven eleven and he says, oh, well that's a great ideal.
Well you should do that too. Those snarky little.
Speaker 2 (13:58):
They're sets jerks there, obxious. They really need their assest,
all of them.
Speaker 3 (14:05):
Well here's how we do it, okay, because we have
on our website motorists dot org, motorsesfloral dot org. You
can go there, there's a little pop up that pops
up right away, or you can go to motors dot org.
Force lest c A for California, and there's a way
there's the people to call who are the next people
who are going to who are the chairs of the committee.
(14:26):
You can call the authors of the bill and tell
them you're unhappy about the bill, and then you can sign.
It's like a petition, petition or an email and you can.
We've made it so simple it literally will take you know,
less than five minutes of your time if you care
about this. We have to get thousands of people to
do this. Remember with AB six sixty six, we got
so many calls. You remember they we had so many
(14:46):
calls and I was up in Sacramento and they pulled
me into the office and begged me to make it stop.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
Remember this, Yes, I do. We have to do with
the wet it to stop?
Speaker 1 (14:55):
Can do this.
Speaker 3 (14:56):
We we got it to stop because people took action.
This is what has to happen.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
Okay, I got one quick thing to run value except
separate story here. But because it's I've been stewing about
it for weeks. So Karen Bass is a million. They're
a billion dollars short in their budget right, and it
turns out that they lose sixty five million dollars a
year on parking tickets, which I think is impossible, possible.
(15:23):
I don't know.
Speaker 3 (15:24):
They losing.
Speaker 2 (15:26):
Sixty five million dollars a year writing parking tickets because
the cost of the salaries and the benefits far exceed
the revenue they're getting in.
Speaker 3 (15:38):
I think you should be a profit center for them.
And they were making millions of dollars on it. This
is this is this is the efficiency of the government.
Which is the same thing with the red light camera program.
Remember they were losing money on it. It was five
hundred dollars tickets. They were losing money on it.
Speaker 2 (15:52):
This is for eight years. They have lost money writing
tickets for eight years parking tickets. That's just not possible.
Speaker 3 (16:01):
Oh, this is a crazy you know what. I've not
heard of this because I moved from LA a couple
of years ago in tune with everything this happened.
Speaker 2 (16:08):
Because we're talking about the reason that they set up
all these these nanny state laws is to get money
for the government. Except in Los Angeles, they lose money
on it. If they if they closed down the whole
parking enforcement agency, they would gain sixty five million in
the budget. That's how nuts it is here.
Speaker 3 (16:29):
That's crazy. I got to go absolutely and say it.
Speaker 2 (16:31):
Okay, thank you for coming on Jay Bieber and let's
keep in touch on this one, all right when we
come back. Trump held a press conference with the Canadian
Prime Minister today and went off on Gavin Newsom and
the high speed rail nonsense.
Speaker 5 (16:48):
You're listening to John Cobel's on Demand from KFI Am.
Speaker 2 (16:52):
Six forty roun from one till four after four o'clock
John cobelt Show on Demand, the podcast on the iHeart app.
Speaking of smoking Robinson, did you see the charges laid
out by those women? Yes, it's disgusting. He's eighty four.
The New York Post has all these disgusting, graphic details.
(17:12):
How do you do How do you do that when
you're eighty four? And it happened to some of these
women a couple of dozen times? Why do you keep
going back in there?
Speaker 6 (17:21):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (17:21):
Do you need a house cleaning job that badly? I
mean what, that's a very good question. After the first time,
don't you like run out screaming into the street? Eighty four? Yeah,
It's like all he did all day is he chased
the housekeepers and did just all kinds of unspeakable things
(17:41):
to them. And his wife is also a part of
this lawsuit. Well, I think she's a Democratic assembly woman.
Maybe Smoky is too. I uh oh, We've got a
lot on that coming up after three o'clock because we're
gonna have Carl de bay On. If you haven't heard
big news today, the Democrats in the Assemble reversed themselves.
They've suddenly decided it is a felony to buy sex
(18:06):
from a sixteen or seventeen year old. How about that,
It is a felony. So we pummeled them into submission.
We'll get through all that later. Now. Trump held a
press conference today with the new Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney.
You know, they're having a feud about the tariffs and
everything else. They had a press conference and somehow the
(18:28):
subject veered into high speed rail and the idiot governor
Newsom play the clip.
Speaker 4 (18:32):
A little train going from San Francisco to Los Angeles
that's being run by Gavin Newscomb, the governor of California.
Speaker 1 (18:41):
Did you ever hear of Gavin Newscomb?
Speaker 4 (18:43):
He has got that train is the worst cossover On
I've ever seen.
Speaker 1 (18:47):
It's like totally out of control.
Speaker 4 (18:50):
So then they said, all right, we will go into
San Francisco, we'll stop twenty five miles short, and we
won't go into Los Angeles. We'll stop twenty five miles short.
It's hundreds of billions of dollars for this stupid project
that should have never been built. And then they realized
that it would have been a lot less costly if
we just gave limousine service back and forth and gave
(19:12):
it free. They would have saved hundreds of billions of dollars.
They have airplanes that go there.
Speaker 1 (19:17):
For one to one hundred.
Speaker 4 (19:18):
The cost, and they have cars. They have a thing
called the Highway that goes back and forth. It's not
fully utilized. And they got involved.
Speaker 1 (19:26):
With this project and Gavin on Fold.
Speaker 4 (19:28):
You know, I always liked Caavin, had a good relationship
with him.
Speaker 1 (19:31):
I just got him a lot of water.
Speaker 4 (19:33):
You know, I sent ten people to open up that
water because he refused to do it, and we just
got him a lot of would if they would have
had that water, and if they would have done what
I said to do, they wouldn't add the fires in
Los Angeles.
Speaker 1 (19:45):
Those fires would have been put out very quickly.
Speaker 4 (19:47):
But if you think about it, and you got to
take a look at this product, it's the worst cost
over and I've ever seen. I've watched a lot of
stupid people build a lot of stupid things, but that's
the worst cost over and I've ever seen what's happening
between San Francisco and Los Angeles. And you want to
ask about that because this government is not going to pay.
Speaker 1 (20:05):
I told our very.
Speaker 4 (20:07):
Great new Secretary of Transportation is doing a good job,
Sean Duffy, I said, we're not going to pay for
that thing. They are just it's out of control. This
is something that you don't have things like this. It's
not even conceivable. Thirty times over budget thirty times. It's
the craziest thing, and now it's hundreds of It was
(20:29):
supposed to be a simple train, and I think the
media should take a look at it.
Speaker 1 (20:34):
And I'd love him to run for.
Speaker 4 (20:35):
President on the other side, you know, I'd love to
see that, but I don't.
Speaker 1 (20:39):
Think he's going to be running because that one.
Speaker 4 (20:42):
Project alone, well, that and the fires and a lot
of other things pretty much put him out of the race.
Speaker 2 (20:49):
Everything he said about the trade is true, and it's
been true since day one. And seventeen fing years later,
and seventeen billion dollars later, they're still working on it.
I read this story in the New York Times over
the weekend. They sent a reporter to talk to some
(21:10):
of the landowners and some of the lawyers involved in
the eminent domain cases because the state had to steal
land away from farmers and ranchers, and they would offer
a cheap compensation price, and so everybody fought it in court.
And you know, and that's that's part of the reason
(21:30):
why this thing is taken forever. It's because they haven't
even acquired all the land yet after seventeen years, they
haven't acquired all the land. And every parcel they bought
was a legal battle, and they carved up so many
farmers properties. What they should have done, if they were
going to do this stupid thing, is go straight down
(21:53):
Interstate five, have it run parallel to Interstate five, or
run it down the middle of Interstate five. Instead they
this way and that way, and it is so stupid.
What is wrong with you people? Why do you allow this?
Did you hear? Last hour we had Bill Jones on
(22:13):
he's the Republican minoriti leader in the Senate, and he's true.
He's telling the truth on this too. Gas is going
to be almost eight point fifty a gallon by next week,
by next year, rather twenty twenty six eight fifty a gallon.
Because there's two major oil refineries closing, and that's twenty
percent of California's gas supply. Two of them are closing,
(22:35):
and there's a sixty five cent gas tax in grease
coming from the California Resources Board over a new fuel blend.
You I don't understand any of this. And red light
cameras and speed cameras and seventeen billion dollars a high
speed rail, and Trump is right. You can get a
(22:57):
round trip to San Francisco to l for one fifty
and my wife and I've driven up to San Francisco
going back a couple dozen times. We had we had
two kids who went to school in the Bay Area.
We went up and down and up and down. One
of my kids was playing baseball, so many weekends we're
driving up and down, up and down, flying up and down,
(23:19):
never a problem, cheap quick. It's all corruption. It's a
seventeen billion dollar boom doggle because all these these first
of all the trade unions made a bundle, and they
they are the ones who held some new some hostage,
and all the attorneys and the engineers and the consultants
(23:42):
and the architects and all all this political scum, all
these parasites right in front of your eyes. And they
were talking to the locals, and everybody said, this will
never be built in our lifetimes. And you have all
these structures left behind for viaducts and bridge and overpasses.
And a couple of people said, it's going to be
(24:03):
like Stonehenge. Some anthropologists is going to come back thousands
of years from now walking through the plains of California
And what the hell is this? Is this built by aliens?
Did they come down from another galaxy? We have our
own Stone Hinge. Maybe that's what the original Stone Hinge
(24:23):
was in England. Maybe he was a high speed rail
project that won awry. All right, we got we got
more on Newsom. Newsom starts babbling about how California is
getting repopulated again. Yeah he missed something though, we'll tell
you about that, and also about Trump is writing checks
(24:47):
now to illegal aliens to get him to leave.
Speaker 5 (24:51):
You're listening to John cobelts on demand from KFI.
Speaker 2 (24:55):
A six John Cobelt's show Moistline eight seven seven Moist
staties for Friday eight seven seven moist eighty six. Don't
tell me you can't think of something. Talkback feature on
the iHeartRadio app. You can use that too. After two o'clock,
Carl Demio coming on Victory Today, Victory the Democrats and
the Assembly, all the perverts and the pedophiles and the predators,
(25:17):
they folded and said they will vote for the provision
that makes it a felony, an automatic felony to buy
teenagers for sex. Unbelievable. All right, here's all right, the
new something let me do this first news went on
some podcasts. Is that only does all days? He does podcasts.
(25:40):
He just sits in his office and talks. He was
with Brian Tyler Cohen, who hosts a show called No
whe with Brian Tyler Cohen. All right, and apparently California's
population has grown. Listen to new some here.
Speaker 3 (25:55):
Can you bring us up to date in terms of
what this population increase looks like for californ.
Speaker 1 (26:00):
No, this is incredibly important.
Speaker 6 (26:01):
Not only now with the fourth largest economy in the world,
Not only do we continue to advance in next generation
technology as it relates to AI, where we dominate the
world and we continue to lead in seconds.
Speaker 2 (26:14):
Well what kind of a show? Is this just an
iHeart show? No, so, what a piece of garbage? Honestly,
little tea up, Well, let's tell me what this population
thing means. And then he goes into his propaganda speech
and what this this turn sits there and listens to it.
Mister three names play, continue playing it, and.
Speaker 6 (26:35):
We continue to lead in innovation, entrepreneurialism. Half the venture
capital in the country, over half fifty seven percent of
all the unicorn companies. Those are private companies worth over
a billion reside in California, more fortune five hundred companies
here than in over a decade. For those that thought
all the companies were leaving the state, it's just made
up the wording population. The new numbers came out. Census
(26:57):
Bureau put out numbers a few weeks back showing population
increase of about two hundred and thirty two thousand. Our
much more conservative Finance Department put out a population growth
numbers at one hundred and eight thousands, back to back
years of growth.
Speaker 2 (27:11):
Well to stop. So one agency says it's over two
hundred thousand. The other agency says, over one hundred thousand.
We're supposed to believe government statistics. How did the second
agency lose one hundred thousand people? Where'd they go? Where
are they hiding? Are they in the shadows? Well, they
are in the shadows because I'd look at the San
Francisco Chronicle and they said this population increase came from immigration.
(27:35):
It wasn't Americans moving into California. It was immigrants. And
of course they don't differentiate whether it's illegal or legal immigrants.
What do you think it is jee Since since twelve
million illegal aliens came across the border in the last
four years, you think a few of them might have
made their way into California. I mean many of them
(27:56):
crossed directly into this state. Trump is giving an illegal
alien one thousand dollars if they agree to get out
of the country. Thousand dollars if you go to your
home country voluntarily and you've got a chance to come back,
(28:20):
Apparently they'll treat you gently if you want to apply
for a return. So it's a thousand bucks to get out.
What they've done is they've taken Biden's stupid CBP app.
You remember that thing where illegal aliens could fill out
an asylum request in their home country or at the
border before they cross, and they'd be pre legalized, at
(28:45):
least temporarily. Well, they shut down that app, and now
they're using the same app so you could register to
get out. They were replaying on Fox Bill Malugins stories
from years ago where planes were landing in the middle
of the night in White Plains, New York, which is
a suburb north of New York City, smaller airport, out
(29:07):
of the way a bit, and that's where they Biden's
landing planes with illegal aliens who had pre registered out
of their home country. One more thing. Trump signed an
executive order today restricting experiments on viruses and toxins that
(29:31):
make them more harmful. This is remember what Anthony Fauci did.
He spent our tax money so that China could come
up with a super duper COVID virus and it worked.
They did killed a million of us, killed millions around
the world. So you know, credit to Fauci should get
some kind of prize for that. The experiment was a
(29:52):
raging success. That's what caused the pandemic. And now Trump
has said no more of that. Now it's not going
to stop every other country from experimenting, but at least
we won't spend our own money on some super toxic
virus that kills us. It'll be on somebody else's dying.
Let the Chinese pay that. The Chinese want to kill us,
(30:13):
that's one thing, no reason we should pay to kill ourselves.
They're such a stupid country, such stupid people. And speaking
of stupid, the Democrats in the Assembly perverts, pedophiles, and predators,
that's truly what they are. They fought to the death
(30:34):
here this week and demanded that there would be no
law that makes it a felony to buy sex from
sixteen to seventeen year olds. And they beat back the
law with fifty five votes. But looks like they lost
the war because they have done a complete one point
eighty and surrendered. They're going to agree to make it
(30:56):
a felony. Carl Demayo is going to come on with us.
He's the one who turned this into a big deal,
the Republican assemblyman from San Diego, who was hosting this
show just a couple of weeks ago. We'll talk to
him next, Deborah Mark. He's live in the KFI twenty
four hour newsroom. Hey, you've been listening to the John
(31:17):
Covelt Show podcast. You can always hear the show live
on KFI Am six forty from one to four pm
every Monday through Friday, and of course, anytime on demand
on the iHeartRadio app
Can't.
Speaker 2 (00:00):
I am six forty. You're listening to the John Cobelt
Podcast on the iHeartRadio app. If you miss any part
of the show, you go to the iHeartRadio app after
four o'clock and listen to the podcast version John Cobelt
Show on demand, same as the radio show. And we
opened with a complete rundown of the big news of
(00:23):
the day. The Democrats in the Assembly, the perverts, pedophiles
and predators have reversed course and they are going to
vote to make it an automatic felony if you buy
sex from a sixteen or seventeen year old, it's an
automatic felony and you'll go to prison. And they tried
(00:44):
every trick, but the blowback was so intense. Carl Demyo
is going to come on in an hour after three
o'clock to tell us what happened to cause this abrupt turnaround.
They still ought to be put on the sex registry list, though,
just for free considering this other things that the Democratic
(01:05):
legislature is doing to us. In the Senate Judiciary Committee,
there's been a hearing. There's been a hearing on a
bill and it's called Senate Bill seven twenty and it's this.
This is this is the one for wait, wait, which
(01:26):
one is this? Because I got two? I got two
bills here. Oh, this is the the red light cameras. Okay,
this is the red light cameras. And then there's another
bill about setting up permanent speed limit zones near schools.
So we're going to talk to Jay Bieber, executive director
of the National Motorist Association. Here. We'll start first with
(01:48):
the red light camera bill. Jay, how are you always good?
Speaker 3 (01:52):
To be with you? Unfortunately, it's always when the government
is trying to screw us over.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
Yeah, I mean, there's so many ways that they're trying
to do it. I got confused here, But let let's
let's do the red light camera bill first. This is
send It Bill seven twenty. What's this supposed to do?
Speaker 3 (02:10):
Okay, well, if you remember back in twenty thirteen, we
fought a bill AB six sixty six, which we called
the Devil's Bill, and that bill was doing to do
basically the same thing this bill would do, which would
be it would take away your right to a trial
for a red light camera ticket. It would make it
a civil violation, so the owner of the vehicle would
be responsible, not the driver. And the ticket itself would
(02:33):
be the only evidence that they would have to present
against you, and the hearing officer who works for the
city that gave you the ticket is the one that
would decide your fate, and he and that person has
to buy law assume that the ticket itself is correct
when you walk in the door, So you have to
prove your your innocence as opposed to them having to
(02:54):
prove your guilt. The only thing they have to present
is a picture of your license plate and the thing
that says you ran the redl So this is basically
just a way to take your money. Now they reduce
the fine, but they want to expand red light cameras
everywhere because it will make it a much much more
profitable for cities to run this because they get to
keep one hundred percent of the money.
Speaker 2 (03:15):
Red light cameras were a thing years ago, and in
La County none of them work anymore, or if they work,
it's not enforced.
Speaker 3 (03:24):
Ye judgmen, Yeah, we got room in La and a
whole bunch of other cities.
Speaker 2 (03:28):
There's still some around. But why is it making a
comeback if this thing died over ten years ago?
Speaker 3 (03:36):
Because these anti car folks. These are the same people
that ran this HLA ballot initiative, and which are those
complete streets people, the bike and ped folks that want
road diets everywhere and everybody to ride a bicycle. They
wrote this bill in cahoots with the red light camera
companies and they and they want one hundred So the
(04:00):
bill puts one hundred percent of the money to their
pet projects like road diets and all of these other
things that they want the fund the road diet right exactly.
So this is this is this bill is one hundred
percent about money. Has nothing to do with safety because
we already have red light cameras in the state. So
though it doesn't like give any additional authority to do
(04:21):
anything or whatever, but it just makes it easier for
them to take your money, to take away or do
process rights. You don't have the right to You don't
have a right to have an attorney. You don't have
the right to have discovery of any evidence against you.
You don't You can't confront any witnesses. Nobody has to
show up to UH to prosecute the ticket, Like no
(04:42):
police officer has to show up and say you know
what you did, Let.
Speaker 2 (04:45):
Me ask you some of the court, how is this
constitutional where you're guilty until proven innocent and you don't
even have the right to a trial. Well, and you
might not even be in the car when this happened,
because this goes to the owner, not the drugt This
doesn't all this seems like it would get thrown out
of court in about five minutes.
Speaker 3 (05:07):
Well, the way they do it is they by the
swipe of a pen. They say, oh, it's not a
criminal thing anymore. We're just going to make it a
civil violation. And under the civil rules we can do
all this kind of stuff about people may or may
not know the difference between civil court and criminal court.
But criminal court there's a much higher standard, and there's
all these rules of evidence and all this kind of stuff.
A civil court is supposed to be Like you and
(05:27):
I have a dispute about money, a contract, whatever, we
go to court. The court decides, you know, who's right
or who's wrong. It's not supposed to be for when
the government comes after you, because the government has all
the power. But by making this a civil case, they
get to throw out all of the rights that you
have and make it and make the government have all
(05:49):
the power, and of course you know they have all
the power walking in the door anyway. So it's just
a way to take your money is more easily, and
then put it the money to do that project.
Speaker 2 (05:59):
Red light cameras. What stops the government from taking photos
of every car that comes through the intersection and then
send you the summons and say, hey, you went through
the red light. And actually they're taking photos of people
who went through green lights. Nothing stops them, nothing stops them,
and they get under this will they get away with
it because you have to prove that you actually went
(06:21):
through a green light, and there's no way you could do.
Speaker 3 (06:23):
That right, or that it was still yellow, or that
the yellow light was was set properly, or any of
the things. I've been an expert witness in a number
of cases having to do with yellow lights. I have
one coming up next week in the city of Hawthorne.
And with this change, there would be no such thing
as an expert witness coming in and you know, defending
you and and proving that the government did what would
(06:45):
did the wrong thing.
Speaker 2 (06:46):
What is with these these these these bike people and
these pedestrian.
Speaker 3 (06:50):
Greens cars, what the hit cars and people who drive well, why.
Speaker 2 (06:53):
Don't they leave the country. Why don't they go live
on an island somewhere, Why don't they go to the moon?
I don't understand this. How do you It's been your
entire life devoted to hating everybody else's car. Hell is wrong.
Mental patients they are.
Speaker 3 (07:09):
And I've had conversations with these people, and basically they say, well,
why do you want all these people to die? Don't
you care about the crisis that's happening on our roadways
and all this kind of stuffing. Pedestrians and bicyclists are dying.
By the way, I'll just give you two interesting statistics
about bicyclists and pedestrians dying with red light with red
light running. So in the entire state of California last
(07:31):
year in twenty twenty four, there were exactly two bicyclists
who died with a driver running running a red light. Now,
of course, those were probably somebody who was drunk anyway,
or any of that kind of stuff.
Speaker 2 (07:41):
People who get run over are drunk or or they're
homeless people. I think they're drugs.
Speaker 3 (07:46):
But okay, but here here's the other part. The number
of people who number of bicyclists who died when the
bicyclist ran the red light was nine, So five times
five times as much as the bicyclists running the red light,
not people in cars run the r like.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
The why, Well, you know what, I think we got
to get an organization of banned bicyclists from the roadway.
How about that?
Speaker 3 (08:05):
I agree, I completely agree. Their answer is let's let's
ban cars. That's that's their answer.
Speaker 2 (08:11):
Okay. You know what, There's all kinds of crazy people
in the world. Right, There's people who believe Eltis is alive,
they believe in aliens, they believe the earth is flat. Right,
there's a certain number are crazy for any number of issues.
How do they get so much influence in the legislature?
Maybe I answered my own question.
Speaker 4 (08:31):
Exactly.
Speaker 3 (08:31):
The crazy people are talking about the crazy people. But
you know, but here's the thing. They come in with
this idea and they tell these legislators who know nothing, okay,
and you explain it, and they say, oh, you know,
all these people are dying and twenty five percent of
fatalities in the state, or people who are running red lights.
Of course it's two point five percent, you know. So
they lie to them, They tell them all these stories
(08:54):
and if it and of course I'm talking about the
other bill, if it has anything to do with children
and protecting children, all fall online because nobody wants this,
you know, to be said that they don't care about children.
And so let me say that the analysis on these
bills have been terrible. They said these are bad ideas.
We have engineers who have written in and said these
(09:15):
are bad ideas, and they all vow for them. Anyway,
because because there's people have to understand how the legislature works.
There is actually no real debate for the most part
about most things. It's just how do we feel about
stuff when the person walks in the door, and maybe
there's a grieving parent of somebody that got killed in.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
So emotional manipulation. Can you hang on for another segment?
Speaker 3 (09:37):
Absolutely?
Speaker 1 (09:38):
All right?
Speaker 2 (09:38):
Can we have even gotten to the school zone new
school zone law that they want to pass. H. JB.
Beran with the National Motorists Association red light cameras and
the bill that they want to pass in the legislature
would make you automatically guilty. You'd have to prove your innocence.
You wouldn't get a court trial. It's a civil case.
(09:59):
And it's the ticket goes to the owner, not the driver.
We got more to say on this trip.
Speaker 5 (10:07):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI A
M six forty.
Speaker 2 (10:13):
We continue with j Biber from the National Motorists Association.
Last segment. If you didn't hear you ought to catch that.
On the podcast, we talked about red light cameras. They're
they're coming back if this bill passes in Sacramento, and
it's going to make it harder to avoid paying the
(10:34):
fine because you're presumed guilty and you have to prove
your innocence, but you don't get a court trial. You
end up with an administrative civil process, and you're guilty
if you're the owner, even if you weren't the one driving.
Now there's a second bill, and this is about expanding
the school zone concept. Let's get Jay Biber on National
(10:57):
Motors Association. Jay, what's this one about? This is Assembly
Bill three eighty two.
Speaker 3 (11:03):
Yeah, Assembly Bill three eighty two by Mark Berman from
the Bay Area. This bill would make school zones essentially
twenty four to seven twenty miles an hour on every roadway.
The way school zones work currently is that it's only
supposed to be a reduction in speed when the kids
are going to and from school, So you know, in
(11:23):
the morning when they're you know, all the kids are
going to school, and in the evening, you know, in
the afternoon when they're leaving school, that's when the school
zone is supposed to be in effect because that's when
you have to slow down for the kids. And so
this same group, by the way, it's the same group
behind this. They want school zones to be twenty miles
an hour, twenty four to seven. The city could just
(11:43):
put up a sign and say twenty four seven school zone.
Why if Why Because here's why. Because they believe in
this concept that twenty is plenty, which is people should
never go above twenty miles an hour lest they hit
a pedestrian or bicyclist.
Speaker 2 (11:57):
Twenty twenty the extent of their intellect, of their cleverness
is a rhyme, a child's rhyme.
Speaker 3 (12:06):
Right, and it's all over the world. Okay, So it's
starting in Europe, of course, and so they can't get
twenty mile an hour speed limits under the current laws.
So they're using the school zone as an excuse to
set this up. So school zones which would probably be
overlapping because it's five hundred feet of any place on
(12:27):
the school property. Okay, so the edge of the school
property five hundred feet from that, five hundred feet from
the other side of the school property, so we're talking about,
you know, half a mile quarter mile distance, and then
they would be overlapping. So you would get all of
these twenty mile an hour zones, and you would have
to know that somebody who is under eighteen is walking
somewhere within five hundred feet of the school, maybe not
(12:49):
even where you can see them. The speed limit would
drop to twenty miles an hour and you would be guilty.
And then they can put up speed cameras because of
the speed camera program that's starting in the state, they
can they can put up speed cameras to ticket you
for doing that.
Speaker 2 (13:04):
So they're going to create these phony twenty mile an
hour zones and then they're gonna put up speed cameras.
Speaker 3 (13:09):
That's exactly right, that's exactly right. It's four they put
up cops and to ticket you whenever two o'clock in
the morning when school and it specifically says school does
not have to be in session, and.
Speaker 2 (13:19):
It's just to steal all the money, right, there's no
other purpose. This has nothing to do with safety, it's.
Speaker 3 (13:25):
No, we have not either with safety. In fact, it
makes school zones less safe because if it's twenty four
seven whenever, people are not gonna pay attention to them
when kids are actually going to and from school, so
it's actually worse for kids. And again, this is about
two things. It's about money, and it's about penalizing you
for getting in your car and driving somewhere. That's what
it's about. And again I talked to these people and
(13:47):
I said, well, why don't you make it twenty miles
an hour so if a kid is walking past the
seven eleven and he says, oh, well that's a great ideal.
Well you should do that too. Those snarky little.
Speaker 2 (13:58):
They're sets jerks there, obxious. They really need their assest,
all of them.
Speaker 3 (14:05):
Well here's how we do it, okay, because we have
on our website motorists dot org, motorsesfloral dot org. You
can go there, there's a little pop up that pops
up right away, or you can go to motors dot org.
Force lest c A for California, and there's a way
there's the people to call who are the next people
who are going to who are the chairs of the committee.
(14:26):
You can call the authors of the bill and tell
them you're unhappy about the bill, and then you can sign.
It's like a petition, petition or an email and you can.
We've made it so simple it literally will take you know,
less than five minutes of your time if you care
about this. We have to get thousands of people to
do this. Remember with AB six sixty six, we got
so many calls. You remember they we had so many
(14:46):
calls and I was up in Sacramento and they pulled
me into the office and begged me to make it stop.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
Remember this, Yes, I do. We have to do with
the wet it to stop?
Speaker 1 (14:55):
Can do this.
Speaker 3 (14:56):
We we got it to stop because people took action.
This is what has to happen.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
Okay, I got one quick thing to run value except
separate story here. But because it's I've been stewing about
it for weeks. So Karen Bass is a million. They're
a billion dollars short in their budget right, and it
turns out that they lose sixty five million dollars a
year on parking tickets, which I think is impossible, possible.
(15:23):
I don't know.
Speaker 3 (15:24):
They losing.
Speaker 2 (15:26):
Sixty five million dollars a year writing parking tickets because
the cost of the salaries and the benefits far exceed
the revenue they're getting in.
Speaker 3 (15:38):
I think you should be a profit center for them.
And they were making millions of dollars on it. This
is this is this is the efficiency of the government.
Which is the same thing with the red light camera program.
Remember they were losing money on it. It was five
hundred dollars tickets. They were losing money on it.
Speaker 2 (15:52):
This is for eight years. They have lost money writing
tickets for eight years parking tickets. That's just not possible.
Speaker 3 (16:01):
Oh, this is a crazy you know what. I've not
heard of this because I moved from LA a couple
of years ago in tune with everything this happened.
Speaker 2 (16:08):
Because we're talking about the reason that they set up
all these these nanny state laws is to get money
for the government. Except in Los Angeles, they lose money
on it. If they if they closed down the whole
parking enforcement agency, they would gain sixty five million in
the budget. That's how nuts it is here.
Speaker 3 (16:29):
That's crazy. I got to go absolutely and say it.
Speaker 2 (16:31):
Okay, thank you for coming on Jay Bieber and let's
keep in touch on this one, all right when we
come back. Trump held a press conference with the Canadian
Prime Minister today and went off on Gavin Newsom and
the high speed rail nonsense.
Speaker 5 (16:48):
You're listening to John Cobel's on Demand from KFI Am.
Speaker 2 (16:52):
Six forty roun from one till four after four o'clock
John cobelt Show on Demand, the podcast on the iHeart app.
Speaking of smoking Robinson, did you see the charges laid
out by those women? Yes, it's disgusting. He's eighty four.
The New York Post has all these disgusting, graphic details.
(17:12):
How do you do How do you do that when
you're eighty four? And it happened to some of these
women a couple of dozen times? Why do you keep
going back in there?
Speaker 6 (17:21):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (17:21):
Do you need a house cleaning job that badly? I
mean what, that's a very good question. After the first time,
don't you like run out screaming into the street? Eighty four? Yeah,
It's like all he did all day is he chased
the housekeepers and did just all kinds of unspeakable things
(17:41):
to them. And his wife is also a part of
this lawsuit. Well, I think she's a Democratic assembly woman.
Maybe Smoky is too. I uh oh, We've got a
lot on that coming up after three o'clock because we're
gonna have Carl de bay On. If you haven't heard
big news today, the Democrats in the Assemble reversed themselves.
They've suddenly decided it is a felony to buy sex
(18:06):
from a sixteen or seventeen year old. How about that,
It is a felony. So we pummeled them into submission.
We'll get through all that later. Now. Trump held a
press conference today with the new Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney.
You know, they're having a feud about the tariffs and
everything else. They had a press conference and somehow the
(18:28):
subject veered into high speed rail and the idiot governor
Newsom play the clip.
Speaker 4 (18:32):
A little train going from San Francisco to Los Angeles
that's being run by Gavin Newscomb, the governor of California.
Speaker 1 (18:41):
Did you ever hear of Gavin Newscomb?
Speaker 4 (18:43):
He has got that train is the worst cossover On
I've ever seen.
Speaker 1 (18:47):
It's like totally out of control.
Speaker 4 (18:50):
So then they said, all right, we will go into
San Francisco, we'll stop twenty five miles short, and we
won't go into Los Angeles. We'll stop twenty five miles short.
It's hundreds of billions of dollars for this stupid project
that should have never been built. And then they realized
that it would have been a lot less costly if
we just gave limousine service back and forth and gave
(19:12):
it free. They would have saved hundreds of billions of dollars.
They have airplanes that go there.
Speaker 1 (19:17):
For one to one hundred.
Speaker 4 (19:18):
The cost, and they have cars. They have a thing
called the Highway that goes back and forth. It's not
fully utilized. And they got involved.
Speaker 1 (19:26):
With this project and Gavin on Fold.
Speaker 4 (19:28):
You know, I always liked Caavin, had a good relationship
with him.
Speaker 1 (19:31):
I just got him a lot of water.
Speaker 4 (19:33):
You know, I sent ten people to open up that
water because he refused to do it, and we just
got him a lot of would if they would have
had that water, and if they would have done what
I said to do, they wouldn't add the fires in
Los Angeles.
Speaker 1 (19:45):
Those fires would have been put out very quickly.
Speaker 4 (19:47):
But if you think about it, and you got to
take a look at this product, it's the worst cost
over and I've ever seen. I've watched a lot of
stupid people build a lot of stupid things, but that's
the worst cost over and I've ever seen what's happening
between San Francisco and Los Angeles. And you want to
ask about that because this government is not going to pay.
Speaker 1 (20:05):
I told our very.
Speaker 4 (20:07):
Great new Secretary of Transportation is doing a good job,
Sean Duffy, I said, we're not going to pay for
that thing. They are just it's out of control. This
is something that you don't have things like this. It's
not even conceivable. Thirty times over budget thirty times. It's
the craziest thing, and now it's hundreds of It was
(20:29):
supposed to be a simple train, and I think the
media should take a look at it.
Speaker 1 (20:34):
And I'd love him to run for.
Speaker 4 (20:35):
President on the other side, you know, I'd love to
see that, but I don't.
Speaker 1 (20:39):
Think he's going to be running because that one.
Speaker 4 (20:42):
Project alone, well, that and the fires and a lot
of other things pretty much put him out of the race.
Speaker 2 (20:49):
Everything he said about the trade is true, and it's
been true since day one. And seventeen fing years later,
and seventeen billion dollars later, they're still working on it.
I read this story in the New York Times over
the weekend. They sent a reporter to talk to some
(21:10):
of the landowners and some of the lawyers involved in
the eminent domain cases because the state had to steal
land away from farmers and ranchers, and they would offer
a cheap compensation price, and so everybody fought it in court.
And you know, and that's that's part of the reason
(21:30):
why this thing is taken forever. It's because they haven't
even acquired all the land yet after seventeen years, they
haven't acquired all the land. And every parcel they bought
was a legal battle, and they carved up so many
farmers properties. What they should have done, if they were
going to do this stupid thing, is go straight down
(21:53):
Interstate five, have it run parallel to Interstate five, or
run it down the middle of Interstate five. Instead they
this way and that way, and it is so stupid.
What is wrong with you people? Why do you allow this?
Did you hear? Last hour we had Bill Jones on
(22:13):
he's the Republican minoriti leader in the Senate, and he's true.
He's telling the truth on this too. Gas is going
to be almost eight point fifty a gallon by next week,
by next year, rather twenty twenty six eight fifty a gallon.
Because there's two major oil refineries closing, and that's twenty
percent of California's gas supply. Two of them are closing,
(22:35):
and there's a sixty five cent gas tax in grease
coming from the California Resources Board over a new fuel blend.
You I don't understand any of this. And red light
cameras and speed cameras and seventeen billion dollars a high
speed rail, and Trump is right. You can get a
(22:57):
round trip to San Francisco to l for one fifty
and my wife and I've driven up to San Francisco
going back a couple dozen times. We had we had
two kids who went to school in the Bay Area.
We went up and down and up and down. One
of my kids was playing baseball, so many weekends we're
driving up and down, up and down, flying up and down,
(23:19):
never a problem, cheap quick. It's all corruption. It's a
seventeen billion dollar boom doggle because all these these first
of all the trade unions made a bundle, and they
they are the ones who held some new some hostage,
and all the attorneys and the engineers and the consultants
(23:42):
and the architects and all all this political scum, all
these parasites right in front of your eyes. And they
were talking to the locals, and everybody said, this will
never be built in our lifetimes. And you have all
these structures left behind for viaducts and bridge and overpasses.
And a couple of people said, it's going to be
(24:03):
like Stonehenge. Some anthropologists is going to come back thousands
of years from now walking through the plains of California
And what the hell is this? Is this built by aliens?
Did they come down from another galaxy? We have our
own Stone Hinge. Maybe that's what the original Stone Hinge
(24:23):
was in England. Maybe he was a high speed rail
project that won awry. All right, we got we got
more on Newsom. Newsom starts babbling about how California is
getting repopulated again. Yeah he missed something though, we'll tell
you about that, and also about Trump is writing checks
(24:47):
now to illegal aliens to get him to leave.
Speaker 5 (24:51):
You're listening to John cobelts on demand from KFI.
Speaker 2 (24:55):
A six John Cobelt's show Moistline eight seven seven Moist
staties for Friday eight seven seven moist eighty six. Don't
tell me you can't think of something. Talkback feature on
the iHeartRadio app. You can use that too. After two o'clock,
Carl Demio coming on Victory Today, Victory the Democrats and
the Assembly, all the perverts and the pedophiles and the predators,
(25:17):
they folded and said they will vote for the provision
that makes it a felony, an automatic felony to buy
teenagers for sex. Unbelievable. All right, here's all right, the
new something let me do this first news went on
some podcasts. Is that only does all days? He does podcasts.
(25:40):
He just sits in his office and talks. He was
with Brian Tyler Cohen, who hosts a show called No
whe with Brian Tyler Cohen. All right, and apparently California's
population has grown. Listen to new some here.
Speaker 3 (25:55):
Can you bring us up to date in terms of
what this population increase looks like for californ.
Speaker 1 (26:00):
No, this is incredibly important.
Speaker 6 (26:01):
Not only now with the fourth largest economy in the world,
Not only do we continue to advance in next generation
technology as it relates to AI, where we dominate the
world and we continue to lead in seconds.
Speaker 2 (26:14):
Well what kind of a show? Is this just an
iHeart show? No, so, what a piece of garbage? Honestly,
little tea up, Well, let's tell me what this population
thing means. And then he goes into his propaganda speech
and what this this turn sits there and listens to it.
Mister three names play, continue playing it, and.
Speaker 6 (26:35):
We continue to lead in innovation, entrepreneurialism. Half the venture
capital in the country, over half fifty seven percent of
all the unicorn companies. Those are private companies worth over
a billion reside in California, more fortune five hundred companies
here than in over a decade. For those that thought
all the companies were leaving the state, it's just made
up the wording population. The new numbers came out. Census
(26:57):
Bureau put out numbers a few weeks back showing population
increase of about two hundred and thirty two thousand. Our
much more conservative Finance Department put out a population growth
numbers at one hundred and eight thousands, back to back
years of growth.
Speaker 2 (27:11):
Well to stop. So one agency says it's over two
hundred thousand. The other agency says, over one hundred thousand.
We're supposed to believe government statistics. How did the second
agency lose one hundred thousand people? Where'd they go? Where
are they hiding? Are they in the shadows? Well, they
are in the shadows because I'd look at the San
Francisco Chronicle and they said this population increase came from immigration.
(27:35):
It wasn't Americans moving into California. It was immigrants. And
of course they don't differentiate whether it's illegal or legal immigrants.
What do you think it is jee Since since twelve
million illegal aliens came across the border in the last
four years, you think a few of them might have
made their way into California. I mean many of them
(27:56):
crossed directly into this state. Trump is giving an illegal
alien one thousand dollars if they agree to get out
of the country. Thousand dollars if you go to your
home country voluntarily and you've got a chance to come back,
(28:20):
Apparently they'll treat you gently if you want to apply
for a return. So it's a thousand bucks to get out.
What they've done is they've taken Biden's stupid CBP app.
You remember that thing where illegal aliens could fill out
an asylum request in their home country or at the
border before they cross, and they'd be pre legalized, at
(28:45):
least temporarily. Well, they shut down that app, and now
they're using the same app so you could register to
get out. They were replaying on Fox Bill Malugins stories
from years ago where planes were landing in the middle
of the night in White Plains, New York, which is
a suburb north of New York City, smaller airport, out
(29:07):
of the way a bit, and that's where they Biden's
landing planes with illegal aliens who had pre registered out
of their home country. One more thing. Trump signed an
executive order today restricting experiments on viruses and toxins that
(29:31):
make them more harmful. This is remember what Anthony Fauci did.
He spent our tax money so that China could come
up with a super duper COVID virus and it worked.
They did killed a million of us, killed millions around
the world. So you know, credit to Fauci should get
some kind of prize for that. The experiment was a
(29:52):
raging success. That's what caused the pandemic. And now Trump
has said no more of that. Now it's not going
to stop every other country from experimenting, but at least
we won't spend our own money on some super toxic
virus that kills us. It'll be on somebody else's dying.
Let the Chinese pay that. The Chinese want to kill us,
(30:13):
that's one thing, no reason we should pay to kill ourselves.
They're such a stupid country, such stupid people. And speaking
of stupid, the Democrats in the Assembly perverts, pedophiles, and predators,
that's truly what they are. They fought to the death
(30:34):
here this week and demanded that there would be no
law that makes it a felony to buy sex from
sixteen to seventeen year olds. And they beat back the
law with fifty five votes. But looks like they lost
the war because they have done a complete one point
eighty and surrendered. They're going to agree to make it
(30:56):
a felony. Carl Demayo is going to come on with us.
He's the one who turned this into a big deal,
the Republican assemblyman from San Diego, who was hosting this
show just a couple of weeks ago. We'll talk to
him next, Deborah Mark. He's live in the KFI twenty
four hour newsroom. Hey, you've been listening to the John
(31:17):
Covelt Show podcast. You can always hear the show live
on KFI Am six forty from one to four pm
every Monday through Friday, and of course, anytime on demand
on the iHeartRadio app
The John Kobylt Show News
Host
John Kobylt
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com