The LGBTQ agenda was first demanding tolerance, then acceptance and finally validation and participation! Now, that seems to be finally too far for The US Supreme Court. David Zanotti breaks down the removal of parental opt out and the importance of what this ruling means for parents.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Previously on your Morning show with Michael Del Juno.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
David Sinati's our senior contributor. Let's start with this Axios story,
which is a warning. I mean, this is the left
warning the left about what's going on, and that is
the socialist justice Democrats are targeting older incumbents, and here
they come. Now Hog's been given his warning. You either
(00:24):
do not get involved in primaries or you're no longer
vice chair. These are major moves that are going to
affect the midterm election. And just to make the long
story short, if he succeeds, and if they do target
old incumbents, then you're going to have young unknowns in
generals against Republicans. You already have a problem losing seats
and redistricting because of population shifting. I mean, the Democrats
(00:45):
are at a real crossroads here, still looking for a leader,
still looking for a message, and now they're looking for numbers,
which is something they always had in their favor.
Speaker 3 (00:55):
Well, they're just swapping their draft picks. They decided I
knew you were better.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
Well, I have no explanation, I'm serious, I have no
explanation for what they did.
Speaker 3 (01:07):
Well, of course I told you they were going to
do that.
Speaker 4 (01:09):
We knew that was going to happen because they need
a lot of football players, not just one.
Speaker 2 (01:14):
Yeah, so that you got too and one in him
and you walked away from it.
Speaker 3 (01:18):
Of course, but you know that's yeah, they've had Let's
not go there. I'm sadness, That's all I have to say.
All right, this factor sadness. Yeah, what's going on right
now is.
Speaker 4 (01:31):
The notion that you can make the generational shift right now,
and that when it comes to congressional races, if your
new look in twenty and twenty six is all youth
and all energy versus the decrepit old people that are around.
Because the Republicans have plenty old folks in the Senate
as well, so they're going to make it a youth
(01:52):
movement and try to see what they can do with that.
They've got nothing else going, So I mean, it's it's
not necessarily a bad strategy. Look, as you now, what
we don't know, Michael, is where the money is going
to come from. We don't know if sous and the
billionaire Cartels, Podesta and others are going to sit out
or they're going to play serious.
Speaker 3 (02:13):
So it's a question. So here's what's interesting.
Speaker 2 (02:16):
Nobody likes Congress right collectively, they're worthless, lowest rated.
Speaker 3 (02:20):
Oh but my congressman, Oh but my senator.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
So you start removing people like Schumer, well, Schumer for
AOC in twenty twenty, that could make sense.
Speaker 3 (02:30):
That would be a bad example.
Speaker 2 (02:31):
But you know, you remove Nancy Pelosi for some unknown
when they're already kind of leaning towards away from the party,
I don't know, that could set up some disadvantaged general
matchups that could become costly. Now they're going to deal
with hog before that, right, because he's either going to
give up on this vision.
Speaker 3 (02:51):
Or they're going to throw them out.
Speaker 2 (02:53):
So that that proof there's a civil war within the
party and it's playing out for everyone to see. I mean,
when Axios has to give a warning to the left
from the ivory tower of the left.
Speaker 4 (03:04):
Sure, sure, but again, and Axios does represent in essence
the Steve Jobs's widow's money, and that's the axious and Atlantic.
That's one piece of the billionaire community. There are several others.
But again we've got to remember that what we're replacing
here are Democrats with democrats. So in regards to the
(03:26):
ultimate changing of the House. Once a person gets into Congress,
their entire perspective changes, their entire credibility changes. If they
can slip some young people in in the name of
a change and pull off a couple of seat changes
and gain control of the House. I mean, they got
nothing else going for him, so.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
They gave everything he needed. Right, you create the greatest
hoax in Joe Biden. And now everybody knows he was old,
he was cognitively impaired, and you hit it. Now he
does a youth movement. Well, we'll see how it shakes out.
All right, let's get to these other two. These are
the biggest I want everyone to listen to. All right,
Here's how the LGBTQ agenda began. First demanding tolerance, tolerance
(04:09):
that biblically were required and are Founding fathers constitutionally required,
and they got it. Then they wanted acceptance and then
ultimately validation. And don't miss this participation, not to be
cute and clever, participation like I guess I have to
be gay tod, but make these people believe that I'm.
Speaker 3 (04:28):
Not against them.
Speaker 2 (04:29):
No participation in terms of indoctrination and education, and so
we would have you know, drag queens coming into elementary classrooms,
or they would start indoctrinating kids with the LGBDQ messaging
and there'd be an opt out and then suddenly, no,
there's no opt out, your kids have to go through it. Well,
(04:51):
that little going too far is going to take them
all the way to the Supreme Court. How important is
this ruling? What does it mean for parents every we're
listening right now.
Speaker 3 (05:01):
Yeah, and it's not.
Speaker 4 (05:02):
Just a single case, Michael, this is going on around
the country. I can remember in nineteen eighty four the
first time we got involved in a school book discussion
with a suburban school district that had brought in a
book titled Life and Health.
Speaker 3 (05:16):
It had a.
Speaker 4 (05:17):
Picture and several paragraphs commenting on what then was considered
the gay lifestyle, and by comparison now, it's barely even
a footnote in the debate compared to the books that
we're talking about now. That particular debate created a huge
battle in a suburban school district in the Midwest that
(05:38):
was amazing, and three school board members were elected and
things changed for a very brief.
Speaker 3 (05:45):
Period of time.
Speaker 4 (05:45):
My point of bringing it up is now this one paragraph,
one picture. Now look at the texts that are going
before the United States Supreme Court. We have a Supreme
Court justice talking about bondage and drag queens in an
oral argument in the court talking about little children. We're
talking about first, second, third, fourth graders. The slippery slope
of this has been a disaster. Could this take us
(06:07):
all the way back to personhood?
Speaker 2 (06:09):
Well?
Speaker 3 (06:10):
And now that brings.
Speaker 4 (06:12):
Us to the next piece of the puzzle, because since
two thousand and three in the Lawrence Vie Texas decision,
the Supreme Court has been playing around with Justice Kennedy's
doctrine of personhood, which equates personhood with sexuality in regards
to preference, proclivity, or practice.
Speaker 3 (06:29):
That's never happened before.
Speaker 4 (06:30):
And once you categorize a behavior as personhood, then it
becomes a protected personhood. And that's what the Court's been
dealing with, finessing and ignoring except for the Scalia descents
before he passed away on what a disaster this would
lead to. This is a major confrontation, and the Court
has an opportunity to roll back the horrible doctrine of
(06:51):
the Kennedy approach on this. This is going to be
to go back to a normal biological reality.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
This is going to clearly be my bias. But the
very foundation that, in my opinion, has built all of
this dysfunction that led to we don't even know how
to define a woman. We don't know what bathroom to
go to. Right, The foundation or justice can't even answer
that question. Right, But the foundation of all that dysfunction,
(07:18):
if we come back to that personhood, that's the end
of the house of cards, right, It truly is.
Speaker 4 (07:24):
It gives the court a chance to roll back and say,
excuse me, that was what courts is commonly called as
dicta That wasn't a finding of the court or a
ruling of the court. That was commentary that's been left there,
but built upon through the Lawrence case in regards to
Texas and the law home regarding homosexuality. And then there's
the Windsor case overturning the federal Defensive Marriage Act. Then
(07:45):
there's California Prop.
Speaker 5 (07:47):
Eight.
Speaker 4 (07:47):
Then there's finally Obergefeld dictating same sex marriage for all
fifty states, all built upon this notion that you can't
discriminate against personhood. But is there a difference between biological
reaction and sexual proclivity, preference, or practice that's the question.
The court is ducked and now they have an opportunity.
(08:08):
That's one piece of it. Then you've got parental rights.
Now that's another whole issue in regards to these textbooks,
in particular because the Court has a much clearer precedent
on parental rights, custodial rights, and the responsibility of raising
and educating children. So there's two ways where this house
of cards could begin to fall.
Speaker 2 (08:27):
Yeah, who do these kids belong to? If it's a village,
they belong to the government. That's what Hillary would have wanted.
I'll never forget and tell. So Oklahoma, after my girls
were born, now this is twenty years ago, and there
was a knock on the door and these people were
we understand you had a new baby, Like who are
you and they were like, you know, well, we're just
(08:47):
here to check up on how everything's going. And that's
when I realized they're checking up on me, not my baby,
you know, and I slam the door in their face.
But this is when I go back and look over
a course of lifetime.
Speaker 3 (09:00):
I mean, Rob Wade would be in there.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
But in terms of one nation under God, indivisible with
liberty and justice for all the Kennedy personhood and if
this unravels that the two biggest things in my lifetime,
hands down.
Speaker 3 (09:16):
Yeah, and what's ironical?
Speaker 2 (09:17):
And nobody's talking about it, nobody, David, nobody on earth.
Speaker 4 (09:20):
While you we did a survey of one hundred judges,
I would venture to say ninety percent of the judges
on the bench don't even know what we're talking about.
Speaker 3 (09:29):
That's tragic. Let alone, let alone the lawyers and guys.
Speaker 5 (09:34):
If you had listened to the oral arguments the other day.
Even Kagan was against this. She was like, well, forget
religious views. You don't have to happen. This is just
a parent view. So this may go seven to two
and again, and we'll see, we'll see.
Speaker 4 (09:50):
But the key is in all of this is the
understanding that local school districts won't do what the Supreme
Court says any how unless parents enforce it. Because I
can tell you going back to nineteen eighty four, they
have defied every citizen action, every legislative action, and every
court dictate, and they do at the local school.
Speaker 3 (10:11):
Look what they did ever they get over.
Speaker 2 (10:13):
Look what they did during COVID. COVID was a great
Remember what we always said COVID revealed way more than
it did everything it revealed now, and.
Speaker 4 (10:22):
That's why people like Podesta and George Soros and the
Obamas and the Clintons can sit back and laugh because
they know our children are being totally dominated by this
philosophy in public education. As far as opt outs, I
mean that is the parents are suddenly realizing they're not
going to do what you tell them to do.
Speaker 3 (10:41):
They're going to do whatever they want to do.
Speaker 2 (10:43):
See them, can't stop them. What's the American lesson here?
Going too far is what created this, and going too
far is what's going to end it. There's something profound there.
Speaker 3 (10:52):
Isn't it. And there's a simple lesson in this as well.
Everything that they're doing we pay for.
Speaker 4 (10:58):
When the American people stand up and say, no more
school levies and no more tax funding at the state level,
We're done with you people. You go broke like you're
making us go broke. The whole thing changes.
Speaker 1 (11:08):
Miss a little, miss a lot, miss a lot, and
we'll miss you. It's your morning show with Michael del
Cherno
Previously on your Morning show with Michael Del Juno.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
David Sinati's our senior contributor. Let's start with this Axios story,
which is a warning. I mean, this is the left
warning the left about what's going on, and that is
the socialist justice Democrats are targeting older incumbents, and here
they come. Now Hog's been given his warning. You either
(00:24):
do not get involved in primaries or you're no longer
vice chair. These are major moves that are going to
affect the midterm election. And just to make the long
story short, if he succeeds, and if they do target
old incumbents, then you're going to have young unknowns in
generals against Republicans. You already have a problem losing seats
and redistricting because of population shifting. I mean, the Democrats
(00:45):
are at a real crossroads here, still looking for a leader,
still looking for a message, and now they're looking for numbers,
which is something they always had in their favor.
Speaker 3 (00:55):
Well, they're just swapping their draft picks. They decided I
knew you were better.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
Well, I have no explanation, I'm serious, I have no
explanation for what they did.
Speaker 3 (01:07):
Well, of course I told you they were going to
do that.
Speaker 4 (01:09):
We knew that was going to happen because they need
a lot of football players, not just one.
Speaker 2 (01:14):
Yeah, so that you got too and one in him
and you walked away from it.
Speaker 3 (01:18):
Of course, but you know that's yeah, they've had Let's
not go there. I'm sadness, That's all I have to say.
All right, this factor sadness. Yeah, what's going on right
now is.
Speaker 4 (01:31):
The notion that you can make the generational shift right now,
and that when it comes to congressional races, if your
new look in twenty and twenty six is all youth
and all energy versus the decrepit old people that are around.
Because the Republicans have plenty old folks in the Senate
as well, so they're going to make it a youth
(01:52):
movement and try to see what they can do with that.
They've got nothing else going, So I mean, it's it's
not necessarily a bad strategy. Look, as you now, what
we don't know, Michael, is where the money is going
to come from. We don't know if sous and the
billionaire Cartels, Podesta and others are going to sit out
or they're going to play serious.
Speaker 3 (02:13):
So it's a question. So here's what's interesting.
Speaker 2 (02:16):
Nobody likes Congress right collectively, they're worthless, lowest rated.
Speaker 3 (02:20):
Oh but my congressman, Oh but my senator.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
So you start removing people like Schumer, well, Schumer for
AOC in twenty twenty, that could make sense.
Speaker 3 (02:30):
That would be a bad example.
Speaker 2 (02:31):
But you know, you remove Nancy Pelosi for some unknown
when they're already kind of leaning towards away from the party,
I don't know, that could set up some disadvantaged general
matchups that could become costly. Now they're going to deal
with hog before that, right, because he's either going to
give up on this vision.
Speaker 3 (02:51):
Or they're going to throw them out.
Speaker 2 (02:53):
So that that proof there's a civil war within the
party and it's playing out for everyone to see. I mean,
when Axios has to give a warning to the left
from the ivory tower of the left.
Speaker 4 (03:04):
Sure, sure, but again, and Axios does represent in essence
the Steve Jobs's widow's money, and that's the axious and Atlantic.
That's one piece of the billionaire community. There are several others.
But again we've got to remember that what we're replacing
here are Democrats with democrats. So in regards to the
(03:26):
ultimate changing of the House. Once a person gets into Congress,
their entire perspective changes, their entire credibility changes. If they
can slip some young people in in the name of
a change and pull off a couple of seat changes
and gain control of the House. I mean, they got
nothing else going for him, so.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
They gave everything he needed. Right, you create the greatest
hoax in Joe Biden. And now everybody knows he was old,
he was cognitively impaired, and you hit it. Now he
does a youth movement. Well, we'll see how it shakes out.
All right, let's get to these other two. These are
the biggest I want everyone to listen to. All right,
Here's how the LGBTQ agenda began. First demanding tolerance, tolerance
(04:09):
that biblically were required and are Founding fathers constitutionally required,
and they got it. Then they wanted acceptance and then
ultimately validation. And don't miss this participation, not to be
cute and clever, participation like I guess I have to
be gay tod, but make these people believe that I'm.
Speaker 3 (04:28):
Not against them.
Speaker 2 (04:29):
No participation in terms of indoctrination and education, and so
we would have you know, drag queens coming into elementary classrooms,
or they would start indoctrinating kids with the LGBDQ messaging
and there'd be an opt out and then suddenly, no,
there's no opt out, your kids have to go through it. Well,
(04:51):
that little going too far is going to take them
all the way to the Supreme Court. How important is
this ruling? What does it mean for parents every we're
listening right now.
Speaker 3 (05:01):
Yeah, and it's not.
Speaker 4 (05:02):
Just a single case, Michael, this is going on around
the country. I can remember in nineteen eighty four the
first time we got involved in a school book discussion
with a suburban school district that had brought in a
book titled Life and Health.
Speaker 3 (05:16):
It had a.
Speaker 4 (05:17):
Picture and several paragraphs commenting on what then was considered
the gay lifestyle, and by comparison now, it's barely even
a footnote in the debate compared to the books that
we're talking about now. That particular debate created a huge
battle in a suburban school district in the Midwest that
(05:38):
was amazing, and three school board members were elected and
things changed for a very brief.
Speaker 3 (05:45):
Period of time.
Speaker 4 (05:45):
My point of bringing it up is now this one paragraph,
one picture. Now look at the texts that are going
before the United States Supreme Court. We have a Supreme
Court justice talking about bondage and drag queens in an
oral argument in the court talking about little children. We're
talking about first, second, third, fourth graders. The slippery slope
of this has been a disaster. Could this take us
(06:07):
all the way back to personhood?
Speaker 2 (06:09):
Well?
Speaker 3 (06:10):
And now that brings.
Speaker 4 (06:12):
Us to the next piece of the puzzle, because since
two thousand and three in the Lawrence Vie Texas decision,
the Supreme Court has been playing around with Justice Kennedy's
doctrine of personhood, which equates personhood with sexuality in regards
to preference, proclivity, or practice.
Speaker 3 (06:29):
That's never happened before.
Speaker 4 (06:30):
And once you categorize a behavior as personhood, then it
becomes a protected personhood. And that's what the Court's been
dealing with, finessing and ignoring except for the Scalia descents
before he passed away on what a disaster this would
lead to. This is a major confrontation, and the Court
has an opportunity to roll back the horrible doctrine of
(06:51):
the Kennedy approach on this. This is going to be
to go back to a normal biological reality.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
This is going to clearly be my bias. But the
very foundation that, in my opinion, has built all of
this dysfunction that led to we don't even know how
to define a woman. We don't know what bathroom to
go to. Right, The foundation or justice can't even answer
that question. Right, But the foundation of all that dysfunction,
(07:18):
if we come back to that personhood, that's the end
of the house of cards, right, It truly is.
Speaker 4 (07:24):
It gives the court a chance to roll back and say,
excuse me, that was what courts is commonly called as
dicta That wasn't a finding of the court or a
ruling of the court. That was commentary that's been left there,
but built upon through the Lawrence case in regards to
Texas and the law home regarding homosexuality. And then there's
the Windsor case overturning the federal Defensive Marriage Act. Then
(07:45):
there's California Prop.
Speaker 5 (07:47):
Eight.
Speaker 4 (07:47):
Then there's finally Obergefeld dictating same sex marriage for all
fifty states, all built upon this notion that you can't
discriminate against personhood. But is there a difference between biological
reaction and sexual proclivity, preference, or practice that's the question.
The court is ducked and now they have an opportunity.
(08:08):
That's one piece of it. Then you've got parental rights.
Now that's another whole issue in regards to these textbooks,
in particular because the Court has a much clearer precedent
on parental rights, custodial rights, and the responsibility of raising
and educating children. So there's two ways where this house
of cards could begin to fall.
Speaker 2 (08:27):
Yeah, who do these kids belong to? If it's a village,
they belong to the government. That's what Hillary would have wanted.
I'll never forget and tell. So Oklahoma, after my girls
were born, now this is twenty years ago, and there
was a knock on the door and these people were
we understand you had a new baby, Like who are
you and they were like, you know, well, we're just
(08:47):
here to check up on how everything's going. And that's
when I realized they're checking up on me, not my baby,
you know, and I slam the door in their face.
But this is when I go back and look over
a course of lifetime.
Speaker 3 (09:00):
I mean, Rob Wade would be in there.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
But in terms of one nation under God, indivisible with
liberty and justice for all the Kennedy personhood and if
this unravels that the two biggest things in my lifetime,
hands down.
Speaker 3 (09:16):
Yeah, and what's ironical?
Speaker 2 (09:17):
And nobody's talking about it, nobody, David, nobody on earth.
Speaker 4 (09:20):
While you we did a survey of one hundred judges,
I would venture to say ninety percent of the judges
on the bench don't even know what we're talking about.
Speaker 3 (09:29):
That's tragic. Let alone, let alone the lawyers and guys.
Speaker 5 (09:34):
If you had listened to the oral arguments the other day.
Even Kagan was against this. She was like, well, forget
religious views. You don't have to happen. This is just
a parent view. So this may go seven to two
and again, and we'll see, we'll see.
Speaker 4 (09:50):
But the key is in all of this is the
understanding that local school districts won't do what the Supreme
Court says any how unless parents enforce it. Because I
can tell you going back to nineteen eighty four, they
have defied every citizen action, every legislative action, and every
court dictate, and they do at the local school.
Speaker 3 (10:11):
Look what they did ever they get over.
Speaker 2 (10:13):
Look what they did during COVID. COVID was a great
Remember what we always said COVID revealed way more than
it did everything it revealed now, and.
Speaker 4 (10:22):
That's why people like Podesta and George Soros and the
Obamas and the Clintons can sit back and laugh because
they know our children are being totally dominated by this
philosophy in public education. As far as opt outs, I
mean that is the parents are suddenly realizing they're not
going to do what you tell them to do.
Speaker 3 (10:41):
They're going to do whatever they want to do.
Speaker 2 (10:43):
See them, can't stop them. What's the American lesson here?
Going too far is what created this, and going too
far is what's going to end it. There's something profound there.
Speaker 3 (10:52):
Isn't it. And there's a simple lesson in this as well.
Everything that they're doing we pay for.
Speaker 4 (10:58):
When the American people stand up and say, no more
school levies and no more tax funding at the state level,
We're done with you people. You go broke like you're
making us go broke. The whole thing changes.
Speaker 1 (11:08):
Miss a little, miss a lot, miss a lot, and
we'll miss you. It's your morning show with Michael del
Cherno
Popular Podcasts
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy And Charlamagne Tha God!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Decisions, Decisions
Welcome to "Decisions, Decisions," the podcast where boundaries are pushed, and conversations get candid! Join your favorite hosts, Mandii B and WeezyWTF, as they dive deep into the world of non-traditional relationships and explore the often-taboo topics surrounding dating, sex, and love. Every Monday, Mandii and Weezy invite you to unlearn the outdated narratives dictated by traditional patriarchal norms. With a blend of humor, vulnerability, and authenticity, they share their personal journeys navigating their 30s, tackling the complexities of modern relationships, and engaging in thought-provoking discussions that challenge societal expectations. From groundbreaking interviews with diverse guests to relatable stories that resonate with your experiences, "Decisions, Decisions" is your go-to source for open dialogue about what it truly means to love and connect in today's world. Get ready to reshape your understanding of relationships and embrace the freedom of authentic connections—tune in and join the conversation!