Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:05):
Traffic and weather every ten minutes.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
This is Charleston's Morning News with Kelly and plays on
ninety four to three.
Speaker 1 (00:13):
WUSC used to be our hype song as we came
in to do our warm ups ahead of a game.
When I play basketball in school, middle and high school,
actually it was high school and they play that. Welcome
in Wednesday edition of the program. Here, Queen Rocks, how's
your Wednesday going. We're looking into today's top stories.
Speaker 3 (00:32):
Family members of the man charged in the fire attack
on Israeli hostage supporters in Colorado are now in ice custody.
Homeland Security Secretary Christy Nome said the wife and five
children of Mohammed Solomon have been taken into custody. They're
being processed for expedited removal. Solomon is here illegally from Egypt.
He faces federal and state charges after at least twelve
(00:55):
people were hurt in Sunday's attack. Police said Solomon dressed
as a gardener to get close to protesters when he
used to make shift flamethrower in maltm cocktails on the crowd.
Speaker 1 (01:05):
When did he lose his shirt? That's interesting, I.
Speaker 3 (01:08):
Guess that was part of his dress up. As a
gardener was to just wear a pair of jeans and
go shirtless.
Speaker 1 (01:15):
You know, I don't mean to laugh, I know me either,
because he can see me, and I'm putting my hand
over my face because twelve people are hurt here and
this is a terror attack, you know, on American soil. Frankly, yes,
but this guy, I mean this, we already know the
FBI is calling it a terror attack. He's an illegal
(01:36):
immigrant from Egypt who overstayed his visa. And now the
fact that his family's in custody. Okay, well they're here illegally.
He overstate his visa first and foremost, it ended expired
in March. So are we supposed to what is supposed
to do with the family.
Speaker 3 (01:57):
Well, I guess we're supposed to feel sorry for them.
Speaker 1 (01:59):
Right, This is what they want, meaning propaganda, press and
the left.
Speaker 3 (02:03):
Oh, there was a whole puff piece yesterday on his daughter,
who was an award winning student and had planned to
go to medical school and all of these but now
all those dreams are dashed.
Speaker 1 (02:14):
So what's the pushback that they didn't know Dad was
a lunatic who it was making Molotov cocktails by the
dozens and no one knew about it, including wife and
at the home.
Speaker 3 (02:27):
I don't know. Maybe they didn't know.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
I don't maybe, but that.
Speaker 3 (02:34):
You know, one doesn't have to do with the other
in my eyes. You know, they're here illegally, and you
know in the news is saying, well, it's unclear the
status of his family. I'm sure that if this guy's
here illegally, his family's not all.
Speaker 1 (02:48):
Legal, right, unless he had a child, possibly, which do
we know the ages of the kids? I don't have
that in front of me at the moment. We certainly
can find out here in the break. But unless there's
some new born child here since he's been in the country,
to me, it's not in question.
Speaker 3 (03:06):
Well even then, I don't think it would be in question.
Well it would be, it would well for the child,
it would.
Speaker 1 (03:12):
Yeah, exactly. But in the meantime, I'm shows you.
Speaker 3 (03:15):
What a mess they've made of the whole thing. Well, yeah,
you know, all these statuses, Well, I don't.
Speaker 1 (03:20):
Think how many people know that. You know, the Biden administration,
you know, made this guy quote unquote valid even though
that's gray. But for March of this year, Okay, Well
it's June, and this man's a lunatic yelling Free Palestine
while lighting elderly people on fire, pretending to be a
shirtless gardener.
Speaker 3 (03:40):
Including a Holocaust survivor. And this is what always gets
me with these stories. So this person survives the Holocaust, Holocaust,
survives the Nazis, survives the death camps, and then gets
attacked on American soil by this.
Speaker 1 (03:56):
Guy emigrant from Egypt.
Speaker 3 (04:00):
Yeah, so there you go. Way to go, Biden administration.
Good job.
Speaker 4 (04:05):
This guy was a lunatic who was at a pro
Israel protest. Elderly Jewish people, including a Holocaust survivor there
calling for the release of hostages taken on October seventh,
and this guy screams Free Palestine and lights them on fire.
Speaker 1 (04:22):
Texas enator Ted Cruz there spitting fire on Fox's ingram Angle.
Speaker 3 (04:27):
So Lee called in and said she saw a report
that said the reason he was shirtless is that he
set himself on fire and stripped his shirt off, and
then in that he looked a little burned, and that
would explain that bandage that's on the side of his
over his ear, on the side of his head too,
So unconfirmed, but it makes sense. So appreciatedly.
Speaker 1 (04:49):
Talking about Mohammed Solomon here arrested for attacking a group
of pro Israel protesters. I don't even they're not protesters.
But at the end of the day, the FBI came
out immediately calling it a terror attack, and we talked
about this. Then I mentioned the ingramng Alum Fox last
night with Texas Center Ted Cruz. He was pretty peeved
that in the beginning the Colorado officials weren't calling it
(05:11):
a terror attack.
Speaker 3 (05:13):
Well, they were a sanctuary city. What would you expect
from them?
Speaker 1 (05:16):
Exactly? Well, and you got to wonder how the people feel,
especially Jewish residents in Boulder, Colorado, feel about not just
the initial reaction of that, but you know, imagine this
is your city.
Speaker 3 (05:28):
Yeah, I would not be happy. And if I was Jewish,
I would not feel safe.
Speaker 1 (05:32):
No, And I'm not sure exactly the laws in this
sanctuary city with regards to packing heat, but I certainly
wouldn't be walking around unprotected.
Speaker 3 (05:42):
They're an open carry state. I don't know about the
local law.
Speaker 1 (05:45):
I was going to say, I think the local law
there are some restrictions, but to be specific on that
at this moment, I can't be I don't have that
in front of me. But the open carry. Okay, so
let me ask you. If it was open carry, there
weren't restrictions in Boulder, Colorado, and you're Jewish? Are you
walking around with a pistol on your hip?
Speaker 3 (06:04):
I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 1 (06:05):
I mean I won't do that anyway. For me as
a female, it makes me a target, I feel like,
because someone could look at that and go, oh, that's
a five hundred and fifty dollars piece right there, and
I can overpower her. I'm stronger than her.
Speaker 3 (06:17):
I mean, it's a personal choice and whatever makes you
feel safe. And you don't want everybody walking around with
a firearm on their hip, even if it's legal, unless
they know how to use the firearm, unless they're well
versed in it and they know safety and all of
these things.
Speaker 1 (06:30):
I just don't want to invite the attention.
Speaker 3 (06:33):
Yeah, I mean, I don't know. I bet you more
of them are today than there were than last week.
Speaker 1 (06:39):
Oh yeah, well, I mean I would hope. So we
are not head on a swivel. We are in scary times.
Do you think this is going to get well? I
would pray that this doesn't get more insane, But come on,
who's in our country. Look at the vetting process of
this guy. Was there any Apparently not, And now we're
supposed to feel sorry for his fan family. This man
(07:02):
overstate his visa. The assumption is the family then must
not be here legally either.
Speaker 3 (07:07):
Yeah, I don't you know, I don't know what the
status is. I know that they have them in custody
in there in the process of deporting them, and you know,
I say good riddance.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
I still go back to the idea that your husband
is making dozens of Malotov cocktails in the house and
you don't have a clue.
Speaker 3 (07:26):
You don't know.
Speaker 1 (07:27):
I mean, I can't help but think I would know
as a wife, I would know. I would know that
my husband had some issues. Clearly, this man mentally is
deranged to go in public and light people on fire,
to you know, have ideologies like this, to make Molotov
cocktails by the dozens.
Speaker 3 (07:48):
Well, you don't know that they knew that he was
making Molotov cocktails or that he had planned this attack.
Speaker 1 (07:55):
I'm home personally saying I can only put myself in
this use of a wife with five children with a
man so well, you'd see either knew about it and
was okay with it, complicit this is what they're investigating.
You're right, I don't know, this is all.
Speaker 3 (08:11):
I don't know that for a fact. And you can't
say that you would know that people are surprised all
the time at what their spouse does that they thought
they would never do.
Speaker 1 (08:19):
Well, I'd be curious if someone would be willing to
admit what that would be. I didn't know my wife
was up to this or might well.
Speaker 3 (08:27):
Right, So, but that doesn't mean that they yet to
stay if they're here illegally, and would you have to
either you follow the law or you don't. And that's
what it comes down to. Yes, And so that's my position.
So I'm not saying they need to go because if
they knew, you know, by association, they're guilty too. If
(08:48):
they're here illegally, and especially after this happens, they need
to go.
Speaker 1 (08:52):
Well, yes, I am of the same position. I still
just am shocked that this woman wouldn't have the idea
that her husband, you know, had ideologies that he would
send him out in public screaming kill Zionists and have
a propensity towards a certain faith or well, there's.
Speaker 3 (09:12):
A lot of people out there shocked at what their
partner has done, and they've discovered that they thought they
would never do.
Speaker 1 (09:19):
Ask around, well, that it's deeper than that. I'm talking
about ideologies here too. Thinks or believes, you know, well.
Speaker 3 (09:27):
Thinks or believes is one thing, and then acting upon
it in a violent fashion is quite a different thing.
Speaker 1 (09:33):
I thought it was interesting. Tell me, how do you
feel about this? So here's Congressman Jim Jordan. He's a
Republican of Ohio. Y'all know Jim Jordan. He's on Fox's
Faulkner Focus, and he's speaking tough about this. But it
kind of bothers me because how long has you know,
Congress not strengthen our laws with regards to immigration. They've
(09:55):
been fighting about this for years. I feel like they've
it's been you know, been broken, and it's been made worse,
not better. And he said the extreme betting, serious betting,
has to happen for these people when they come in
and that they overstay. You got to go, yeah, well,
but that's not happening. People are being put in front
of judges who are letting these people go.
Speaker 3 (10:15):
You can only pass so many laws, and if everybody
doesn't cooperate with the laws. If the judiciary doesn't cooperate,
and the local governments don't cooperate, and the freaking president
of the United States doesn't cooperate, what are you.
Speaker 1 (10:31):
Going to do? So that's where we are. But yeah,
I don't know. I listened to Jim Jordan say that,
and I thought, all right, well, we've got control of
the House, the Senate, and the White House. Let's do
something about it. And I understand that there are even
in the previous administration, there are people out there doing
their jobs, putting them in front of judges who are
(10:52):
letting these people go. And that even includes the El
Salvador case with the whole Maryland father. That guy was
in front of them multiple Well.
Speaker 3 (11:01):
This administration is trying to do something about it, and
they're getting blocked at every turn.
Speaker 1 (11:05):
Well, so this is going to be interesting to find
out what happens with the family, the five kids, the wife.
If this man over state a visa, just follow the law,
then that means that the family is here illegally as
well on and overstayed visa.
Speaker 3 (11:18):
Well, it would be a good start to follow the
laws that we already have on the books before talking
about putting more laws on the books. And I've argued
that we have too many laws, and then we become
a lawless society because you can't pay attention to the
minutia of everything that becomes legal or illegal. And they're
always politicking on passing more laws when they don't enforce
(11:42):
the laws that are already on the books.
Speaker 1 (11:44):
Well, and who's they? I mean, we go back to
these activities judges and yeah, well I would agree, too many.
Speaker 3 (11:50):
People in charge, politicians and you know, the people that
are in charge of various different entities in this country,
that's who they are. So start by following the laws
that we have. Pardon me, do you know what you're doing?
The Department of Justice is looking into people pardoned by
former President Biden. It comes as concerns Ryans about Biden's
state of mind while serving his final months in office.
(12:14):
I laugh, because final months in office? How about the
whole time he was in office. Pardon Attorney Ed Martin
will reportedly lead the reviews to see if staffords took
advantage of the former president. Biden grinted clemency and pardoned
over fifteen hundred people in his final weeks, including members
of his family and death row inmates. President Trump has
accused the previous administration of using an auto pen to
(12:37):
sign documents, including pardons.
Speaker 1 (12:40):
His mental capacity was clearly being taken at. He was
being taken advantage of. Now, can that really be in
any way overturn these pardons, given the fact that presidents
have these sweeping clemency powers. I don't know.
Speaker 3 (12:56):
Well, I mean, technically it could be if a crime
was committed in the process, and a crime would be
committed in the process if he did not know.
Speaker 1 (13:05):
Thought a pen first.
Speaker 3 (13:06):
What I was going to say, They're never going to
be able to prove it, so right, But he clearly
didn't know. And there's several points in the media where
he's asked. Everybody from Mike Johnson to certain reporters have
said that they asked him about things, and it's even
on some video where they ask him and he says,
I didn't do that, and he clearly did do that. So,
(13:29):
you know, and at the time it was like, oh,
look at the confused old man. He can't remember doing that. Well,
now it makes more sense, doesn't it. He didn't do it.
Speaker 1 (13:36):
We also had the Her report and so many other things.
But again to your point about the autopenna, they were
really going to be able to prove this and the
sweeping clemency powers. I don't know much as I'd like
to see justice here, even for the fact that the
man was.
Speaker 3 (13:54):
Well, it's not about the right to use that whether
he had the right to grant these pardons or clemency.
It's about the fact that did he intend to did
he eat or somebody else do it on his behalf
unbeknounced to him. This is that would be a crime.
Speaker 1 (14:11):
Right, This is what some Republicans are saying. This is
you know, including those in the administration who were pushing
back and saying, wait a second, I don't we don't
even see this guy even knew what was going on,
much less the you have to You would have to
think that he probably knew son's sister brother. When it
comes to the pardons, I'm sure someone told him about
(14:33):
those I don't know the death row inmate, and I
think there's more than one.
Speaker 3 (14:40):
Well, he fifteen hundred people that he pardoned and gave
clemency to. And whether he knew I mean, I would
agree he probably knew about his family members. But remember
he said over and over and over again. He was
not going to pardon Hunter and he wasn't going to
do that. That's true, But then again, he's a liar
also and always has been, so who knows. But the
(15:02):
fact of the matter is, was somebody acting on his behalf?
Was there is somebody that was pushing their own agenda?
And what's the word I'm looking for, doing acts, completing
tasks that the president would normally complete.
Speaker 1 (15:23):
Acting nefariously in a shadow position of government.
Speaker 3 (15:27):
Right, And it's not really in the shadow position. It's
just outright being dishonest. If you're given agency for something
and you abuse that agency and it's at the highest
level of the US government, I mean, that's pretty serious.
Speaker 1 (15:43):
I would agree this would take what a whistleblower within
the administration as somebody who's got a whole lot of
backbone to whistleblow on this.
Speaker 3 (15:57):
Well, it would take even more than that, right, So yeah,
I mean that would be.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
A great start start to getting to evidence with which
could be prosecuted. Yeah, potentially to be continued. I suppose
on this one.
Speaker 3 (16:09):
Good Wednesday morning to you, Thanks for listening this morning.
Are you fully awake yet? Maybe you could use a
cup of coffee, A cup of coffee in the morning
could help women stay healthy as they get older. Research
out of Harvard University followed a group of fifty thousand
women for thirty years. Drinking coffee every morning was linked
to staying mentally sharp and physically strong later in life.
(16:30):
Decaf coffee and tea did not have the same effect.
Speaker 1 (16:34):
Are useless. I'm kidding. There's some tea actually has a
whole lot of caffeine and at Green tea and other things.
Speaker 3 (16:40):
But well, they found that tea did not have the
same effect.
Speaker 1 (16:43):
Okay, are you a little shocked that there are women
being followed around for thirty years for a case study
drinking coffee. That's a long That's quite impressive to me
that this they've been followed around for thirty years.
Speaker 3 (16:56):
Well, a lot of these studies, I mean, really, that's
what it takes sometimes and sometimes even longer.
Speaker 1 (17:02):
I just tend to believe it a little more. They've
been they've been doing their homework frankly for decades at
this point. So great. I'm certainly one of the gals
who likes to hear this. I drink I drink ice
espressed with the restraw every morning. I don't know, if
it'll be doing that late into my older age.
Speaker 3 (17:17):
But I don't mess with the caf Well, I drink
semi sweet tea and that's about all I drink.
Speaker 1 (17:24):
You literally never drink coffee.
Speaker 3 (17:26):
I mean and not I wouldn't say never, but not
every morning as every morning, and you know why. I mean,
I like coffee, but keeping it warm. I like sipping
on something. That's why coffee always goes cold.
Speaker 1 (17:38):
And then yeah, ice mind.
Speaker 3 (17:40):
So I just stick to my iced tea all day long.
And I carry you see, I carry a big old
gallon jug of tea everything huge. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (17:49):
Two does the uh rick rush over a weasel?
Speaker 3 (17:52):
He? Uh?
Speaker 1 (17:53):
And why one? Two? Five? He's a tea guy too,
and he's got a huge jug of tea, like the
only one that drinks coffee here.
Speaker 3 (18:00):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (18:01):
Well, I I mean I'm even adding powders that have mushroom,
you know all that. I'm putting all kinds of stuff
in my coffee.
Speaker 3 (18:10):
Yuck.
Speaker 1 (18:10):
Well, it's helping my brain, I'll tell you, that, is it. Yeah,
I don't even know. I at cordisse EPs and all this.
You know, some kind of crazy cinnamon ceylon cinnamon.
Speaker 3 (18:21):
And well, you need to do a thirty year study
and see if.
Speaker 1 (18:23):
That's really want case study for thirty years, I would
not sign up for that, Like, I'm just shocked. Well
follow me around for thirty years? Good lord, I know.
Speaker 3 (18:35):
That's kind of creepster, isn't it.
Speaker 1 (18:36):
I mean, are these people doing this for free? You
imagine someone coming up to you and saying, hey, we
want to study your habits every morning for the next
thirty years. I'd be like, are you paying me for that?
Speaker 3 (18:45):
No way, I don't know if they follow you that closely,
I think just to ask you did you Are you
a daily coffee drinker? And hey, come in, you know,
on a regular basis here, and you know, we'll record with.
Speaker 1 (18:59):
You, just to commit. I'm shocked to hear. But anyway,
and I'm happy to hear that. How many women out
there during coffee every day into their older ages.
Speaker 3 (19:06):
I don't know, Well, maybe those women are just committed
to helping humanity and enjoy their mourning.
Speaker 1 (19:11):
Coffee and are helping themselves do Apparently.
Speaker 3 (19:14):
So this guy was thinking outside the box. A Milwaukee
man is accused of trying to get a witness against
him deported by falsifying letters threatening President Trump prosecutors say
Dimitric Scott used victim Ramon Morales Reyes's name in threatening
letters sent a few weeks ago about assassinating President Trump.
(19:35):
Scott was charged yesterday with felony, witness intimidation, bail jumping,
and other related charges in addition to his armed robbery charges.
Morales Reyes carries a U visa and we'll see an
immigration judge today and could possibly be deported.
Speaker 1 (19:53):
And why was he framing this worker because you're on
a worker's visa.
Speaker 3 (19:59):
He was he was brought up on armed robbery charges
and he accused this witness against him. So there was
a witness against him in this armed robbery case. So
he falsified this assassination threat in the name of the witness.
Speaker 1 (20:17):
Good night.
Speaker 3 (20:19):
Yeah, I mean that's pretty evil.
Speaker 1 (20:21):
Good. I mean, this is where I don't have a
criminal mind.
Speaker 3 (20:24):
And then I'm like, what's a U visa? So a
you visa is a non immigrant visa for crime victims
in their immediate family members in the United States who
have suffered mental or physical abuse due to a qualifying crime,
and who are willing to help law enforcement investigate or
prosecute that crime.
Speaker 1 (20:42):
So does it sound like this person may have been
here without a visa, he's.
Speaker 3 (20:46):
Here on a U visa. Well, and that's what a
uvisa is.
Speaker 1 (20:50):
And I'm saying maybe he was granted a U visa
to be able to be some type of informant to
law enforcement.
Speaker 3 (20:57):
It sounds like he was a victim of another crime
and that he was cooperating with police. And then the
uvisa also says gives the non immigrant designation. So what
does that mean? So non immigrant status are people that
intend to return home eventually. So immigrant status is people
(21:19):
that intend to stay. Non immigrant status are people that
intend to return home at some point in time.
Speaker 1 (21:26):
I wonder how long he's been here and if he's
intending to turn home return home.
Speaker 3 (21:30):
Yeah, I mean, we don't know any of these things. Wow,
And you would hope that this immigration judge today, would
you know, would say, Okay, you've been a victim again.
Speaker 1 (21:39):
Yes, time to go. If he's no, it's not time
to Well, if you said he's immigrant or non immigrant,
meaning he's going back.
Speaker 3 (21:49):
He's here under a uvisa over a separate case where
I don't know the details. I'm when I look up
what a uvisa is, I assume that the guy has
suffered from another crime and he's cooperating from police and
they gave him a U visa. Now this guy comes
along and frames him as threatening President Trump because he's
(22:14):
a witness against him in a crime. So he frames
him and then now he has to go in front
of this immigration judge. So I'm saying, hopefully the immigration
judge will say, well, now you've been a victim again.
And I don't know you know all the details, but
I would hope from what we know that he's treated
fairly and not deported because he's been the victim of
(22:36):
this guy who was charged with armed robbery charges that
he was a witness against and then this guy in
his took his name and threatened President Trump to try
to get him to discredit him as a witness against him.
Speaker 1 (22:49):
Right, I would agree that he sounds like he's been
a victim now twice of crime. But the non immigrant
visa part of it is what I was wondering about.
So is it actually legal for this judge to deport
this guy because of non immigrant didn't you say non
imgrant was that they were going back under the U visa.
Speaker 3 (23:08):
At some point, So so.
Speaker 1 (23:10):
It is possible this guy gets the boot, whether it's
fair or not.
Speaker 3 (23:14):
I mean, if you're following the law, yeah, I mean
I don't know what the details are, but let's assume
that his U VISA is still valid and that he's
just been framed. That I would say the judge will
probably say, Okay, this is a setup. In case dismissed.
Speaker 2 (23:31):
Thanks for listening to the Charleston Morning Use podcast. Catch
Kelly and Blaze weekday mornings from six to nine.
Traffic and weather every ten minutes.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
This is Charleston's Morning News with Kelly and plays on
ninety four to three.
Speaker 1 (00:13):
WUSC used to be our hype song as we came
in to do our warm ups ahead of a game.
When I play basketball in school, middle and high school,
actually it was high school and they play that. Welcome
in Wednesday edition of the program. Here, Queen Rocks, how's
your Wednesday going. We're looking into today's top stories.
Speaker 3 (00:32):
Family members of the man charged in the fire attack
on Israeli hostage supporters in Colorado are now in ice custody.
Homeland Security Secretary Christy Nome said the wife and five
children of Mohammed Solomon have been taken into custody. They're
being processed for expedited removal. Solomon is here illegally from Egypt.
He faces federal and state charges after at least twelve
(00:55):
people were hurt in Sunday's attack. Police said Solomon dressed
as a gardener to get close to protesters when he
used to make shift flamethrower in maltm cocktails on the crowd.
Speaker 1 (01:05):
When did he lose his shirt? That's interesting, I.
Speaker 3 (01:08):
Guess that was part of his dress up. As a
gardener was to just wear a pair of jeans and
go shirtless.
Speaker 1 (01:15):
You know, I don't mean to laugh, I know me either,
because he can see me, and I'm putting my hand
over my face because twelve people are hurt here and
this is a terror attack, you know, on American soil. Frankly, yes,
but this guy, I mean this, we already know the
FBI is calling it a terror attack. He's an illegal
(01:36):
immigrant from Egypt who overstayed his visa. And now the
fact that his family's in custody. Okay, well they're here illegally.
He overstate his visa first and foremost, it ended expired
in March. So are we supposed to what is supposed
to do with the family.
Speaker 3 (01:57):
Well, I guess we're supposed to feel sorry for them.
Speaker 1 (01:59):
Right, This is what they want, meaning propaganda, press and
the left.
Speaker 3 (02:03):
Oh, there was a whole puff piece yesterday on his daughter,
who was an award winning student and had planned to
go to medical school and all of these but now
all those dreams are dashed.
Speaker 1 (02:14):
So what's the pushback that they didn't know Dad was
a lunatic who it was making Molotov cocktails by the
dozens and no one knew about it, including wife and
at the home.
Speaker 3 (02:27):
I don't know. Maybe they didn't know.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
I don't maybe, but that.
Speaker 3 (02:34):
You know, one doesn't have to do with the other
in my eyes. You know, they're here illegally, and you
know in the news is saying, well, it's unclear the
status of his family. I'm sure that if this guy's
here illegally, his family's not all.
Speaker 1 (02:48):
Legal, right, unless he had a child, possibly, which do
we know the ages of the kids? I don't have
that in front of me at the moment. We certainly
can find out here in the break. But unless there's
some new born child here since he's been in the country,
to me, it's not in question.
Speaker 3 (03:06):
Well even then, I don't think it would be in question.
Well it would be, it would well for the child,
it would.
Speaker 1 (03:12):
Yeah, exactly. But in the meantime, I'm shows you.
Speaker 3 (03:15):
What a mess they've made of the whole thing. Well, yeah,
you know, all these statuses, Well, I don't.
Speaker 1 (03:20):
Think how many people know that. You know, the Biden administration,
you know, made this guy quote unquote valid even though
that's gray. But for March of this year, Okay, Well
it's June, and this man's a lunatic yelling Free Palestine
while lighting elderly people on fire, pretending to be a
shirtless gardener.
Speaker 3 (03:40):
Including a Holocaust survivor. And this is what always gets
me with these stories. So this person survives the Holocaust, Holocaust,
survives the Nazis, survives the death camps, and then gets
attacked on American soil by this.
Speaker 1 (03:56):
Guy emigrant from Egypt.
Speaker 3 (04:00):
Yeah, so there you go. Way to go, Biden administration.
Good job.
Speaker 4 (04:05):
This guy was a lunatic who was at a pro
Israel protest. Elderly Jewish people, including a Holocaust survivor there
calling for the release of hostages taken on October seventh,
and this guy screams Free Palestine and lights them on fire.
Speaker 1 (04:22):
Texas enator Ted Cruz there spitting fire on Fox's ingram Angle.
Speaker 3 (04:27):
So Lee called in and said she saw a report
that said the reason he was shirtless is that he
set himself on fire and stripped his shirt off, and
then in that he looked a little burned, and that
would explain that bandage that's on the side of his
over his ear, on the side of his head too,
So unconfirmed, but it makes sense. So appreciatedly.
Speaker 1 (04:49):
Talking about Mohammed Solomon here arrested for attacking a group
of pro Israel protesters. I don't even they're not protesters.
But at the end of the day, the FBI came
out immediately calling it a terror attack, and we talked
about this. Then I mentioned the ingramng Alum Fox last
night with Texas Center Ted Cruz. He was pretty peeved
that in the beginning the Colorado officials weren't calling it
(05:11):
a terror attack.
Speaker 3 (05:13):
Well, they were a sanctuary city. What would you expect
from them?
Speaker 1 (05:16):
Exactly? Well, and you got to wonder how the people feel,
especially Jewish residents in Boulder, Colorado, feel about not just
the initial reaction of that, but you know, imagine this
is your city.
Speaker 3 (05:28):
Yeah, I would not be happy. And if I was Jewish,
I would not feel safe.
Speaker 1 (05:32):
No, And I'm not sure exactly the laws in this
sanctuary city with regards to packing heat, but I certainly
wouldn't be walking around unprotected.
Speaker 3 (05:42):
They're an open carry state. I don't know about the
local law.
Speaker 1 (05:45):
I was going to say, I think the local law
there are some restrictions, but to be specific on that
at this moment, I can't be I don't have that
in front of me. But the open carry. Okay, so
let me ask you. If it was open carry, there
weren't restrictions in Boulder, Colorado, and you're Jewish? Are you
walking around with a pistol on your hip?
Speaker 3 (06:04):
I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 1 (06:05):
I mean I won't do that anyway. For me as
a female, it makes me a target, I feel like,
because someone could look at that and go, oh, that's
a five hundred and fifty dollars piece right there, and
I can overpower her. I'm stronger than her.
Speaker 3 (06:17):
I mean, it's a personal choice and whatever makes you
feel safe. And you don't want everybody walking around with
a firearm on their hip, even if it's legal, unless
they know how to use the firearm, unless they're well
versed in it and they know safety and all of
these things.
Speaker 1 (06:30):
I just don't want to invite the attention.
Speaker 3 (06:33):
Yeah, I mean, I don't know. I bet you more
of them are today than there were than last week.
Speaker 1 (06:39):
Oh yeah, well, I mean I would hope. So we
are not head on a swivel. We are in scary times.
Do you think this is going to get well? I
would pray that this doesn't get more insane, But come on,
who's in our country. Look at the vetting process of
this guy. Was there any Apparently not, And now we're
supposed to feel sorry for his fan family. This man
(07:02):
overstate his visa. The assumption is the family then must
not be here legally either.
Speaker 3 (07:07):
Yeah, I don't you know, I don't know what the
status is. I know that they have them in custody
in there in the process of deporting them, and you know,
I say good riddance.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
I still go back to the idea that your husband
is making dozens of Malotov cocktails in the house and
you don't have a clue.
Speaker 3 (07:26):
You don't know.
Speaker 1 (07:27):
I mean, I can't help but think I would know
as a wife, I would know. I would know that
my husband had some issues. Clearly, this man mentally is
deranged to go in public and light people on fire,
to you know, have ideologies like this, to make Molotov
cocktails by the dozens.
Speaker 3 (07:48):
Well, you don't know that they knew that he was
making Molotov cocktails or that he had planned this attack.
Speaker 1 (07:55):
I'm home personally saying I can only put myself in
this use of a wife with five children with a
man so well, you'd see either knew about it and
was okay with it, complicit this is what they're investigating.
You're right, I don't know, this is all.
Speaker 3 (08:11):
I don't know that for a fact. And you can't
say that you would know that people are surprised all
the time at what their spouse does that they thought
they would never do.
Speaker 1 (08:19):
Well, I'd be curious if someone would be willing to
admit what that would be. I didn't know my wife
was up to this or might well.
Speaker 3 (08:27):
Right, So, but that doesn't mean that they yet to
stay if they're here illegally, and would you have to
either you follow the law or you don't. And that's
what it comes down to. Yes, And so that's my position.
So I'm not saying they need to go because if
they knew, you know, by association, they're guilty too. If
(08:48):
they're here illegally, and especially after this happens, they need
to go.
Speaker 1 (08:52):
Well, yes, I am of the same position. I still
just am shocked that this woman wouldn't have the idea
that her husband, you know, had ideologies that he would
send him out in public screaming kill Zionists and have
a propensity towards a certain faith or well, there's.
Speaker 3 (09:12):
A lot of people out there shocked at what their
partner has done, and they've discovered that they thought they
would never do.
Speaker 1 (09:19):
Ask around, well, that it's deeper than that. I'm talking
about ideologies here too. Thinks or believes, you know, well.
Speaker 3 (09:27):
Thinks or believes is one thing, and then acting upon
it in a violent fashion is quite a different thing.
Speaker 1 (09:33):
I thought it was interesting. Tell me, how do you
feel about this? So here's Congressman Jim Jordan. He's a
Republican of Ohio. Y'all know Jim Jordan. He's on Fox's
Faulkner Focus, and he's speaking tough about this. But it
kind of bothers me because how long has you know,
Congress not strengthen our laws with regards to immigration. They've
(09:55):
been fighting about this for years. I feel like they've
it's been you know, been broken, and it's been made worse,
not better. And he said the extreme betting, serious betting,
has to happen for these people when they come in
and that they overstay. You got to go, yeah, well,
but that's not happening. People are being put in front
of judges who are letting these people go.
Speaker 3 (10:15):
You can only pass so many laws, and if everybody
doesn't cooperate with the laws. If the judiciary doesn't cooperate,
and the local governments don't cooperate, and the freaking president
of the United States doesn't cooperate, what are you.
Speaker 1 (10:31):
Going to do? So that's where we are. But yeah,
I don't know. I listened to Jim Jordan say that,
and I thought, all right, well, we've got control of
the House, the Senate, and the White House. Let's do
something about it. And I understand that there are even
in the previous administration, there are people out there doing
their jobs, putting them in front of judges who are
(10:52):
letting these people go. And that even includes the El
Salvador case with the whole Maryland father. That guy was
in front of them multiple Well.
Speaker 3 (11:01):
This administration is trying to do something about it, and
they're getting blocked at every turn.
Speaker 1 (11:05):
Well, so this is going to be interesting to find
out what happens with the family, the five kids, the wife.
If this man over state a visa, just follow the law,
then that means that the family is here illegally as
well on and overstayed visa.
Speaker 3 (11:18):
Well, it would be a good start to follow the
laws that we already have on the books before talking
about putting more laws on the books. And I've argued
that we have too many laws, and then we become
a lawless society because you can't pay attention to the
minutia of everything that becomes legal or illegal. And they're
always politicking on passing more laws when they don't enforce
(11:42):
the laws that are already on the books.
Speaker 1 (11:44):
Well, and who's they? I mean, we go back to
these activities judges and yeah, well I would agree, too many.
Speaker 3 (11:50):
People in charge, politicians and you know, the people that
are in charge of various different entities in this country,
that's who they are. So start by following the laws
that we have. Pardon me, do you know what you're doing?
The Department of Justice is looking into people pardoned by
former President Biden. It comes as concerns Ryans about Biden's
state of mind while serving his final months in office.
(12:14):
I laugh, because final months in office? How about the
whole time he was in office. Pardon Attorney Ed Martin
will reportedly lead the reviews to see if staffords took
advantage of the former president. Biden grinted clemency and pardoned
over fifteen hundred people in his final weeks, including members
of his family and death row inmates. President Trump has
accused the previous administration of using an auto pen to
(12:37):
sign documents, including pardons.
Speaker 1 (12:40):
His mental capacity was clearly being taken at. He was
being taken advantage of. Now, can that really be in
any way overturn these pardons, given the fact that presidents
have these sweeping clemency powers. I don't know.
Speaker 3 (12:56):
Well, I mean, technically it could be if a crime
was committed in the process, and a crime would be
committed in the process if he did not know.
Speaker 1 (13:05):
Thought a pen first.
Speaker 3 (13:06):
What I was going to say, They're never going to
be able to prove it, so right, But he clearly
didn't know. And there's several points in the media where
he's asked. Everybody from Mike Johnson to certain reporters have
said that they asked him about things, and it's even
on some video where they ask him and he says,
I didn't do that, and he clearly did do that. So,
(13:29):
you know, and at the time it was like, oh,
look at the confused old man. He can't remember doing that. Well,
now it makes more sense, doesn't it. He didn't do it.
Speaker 1 (13:36):
We also had the Her report and so many other things.
But again to your point about the autopenna, they were
really going to be able to prove this and the
sweeping clemency powers. I don't know much as I'd like
to see justice here, even for the fact that the
man was.
Speaker 3 (13:54):
Well, it's not about the right to use that whether
he had the right to grant these pardons or clemency.
It's about the fact that did he intend to did
he eat or somebody else do it on his behalf
unbeknounced to him. This is that would be a crime.
Speaker 1 (14:11):
Right, This is what some Republicans are saying. This is
you know, including those in the administration who were pushing
back and saying, wait a second, I don't we don't
even see this guy even knew what was going on,
much less the you have to You would have to
think that he probably knew son's sister brother. When it
comes to the pardons, I'm sure someone told him about
(14:33):
those I don't know the death row inmate, and I
think there's more than one.
Speaker 3 (14:40):
Well, he fifteen hundred people that he pardoned and gave
clemency to. And whether he knew I mean, I would
agree he probably knew about his family members. But remember
he said over and over and over again. He was
not going to pardon Hunter and he wasn't going to
do that. That's true, But then again, he's a liar
also and always has been, so who knows. But the
(15:02):
fact of the matter is, was somebody acting on his behalf?
Was there is somebody that was pushing their own agenda?
And what's the word I'm looking for, doing acts, completing
tasks that the president would normally complete.
Speaker 1 (15:23):
Acting nefariously in a shadow position of government.
Speaker 3 (15:27):
Right, And it's not really in the shadow position. It's
just outright being dishonest. If you're given agency for something
and you abuse that agency and it's at the highest
level of the US government, I mean, that's pretty serious.
Speaker 1 (15:43):
I would agree this would take what a whistleblower within
the administration as somebody who's got a whole lot of
backbone to whistleblow on this.
Speaker 3 (15:57):
Well, it would take even more than that, right, So yeah,
I mean that would be.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
A great start start to getting to evidence with which
could be prosecuted. Yeah, potentially to be continued. I suppose
on this one.
Speaker 3 (16:09):
Good Wednesday morning to you, Thanks for listening this morning.
Are you fully awake yet? Maybe you could use a
cup of coffee, A cup of coffee in the morning
could help women stay healthy as they get older. Research
out of Harvard University followed a group of fifty thousand
women for thirty years. Drinking coffee every morning was linked
to staying mentally sharp and physically strong later in life.
(16:30):
Decaf coffee and tea did not have the same effect.
Speaker 1 (16:34):
Are useless. I'm kidding. There's some tea actually has a
whole lot of caffeine and at Green tea and other things.
Speaker 3 (16:40):
But well, they found that tea did not have the
same effect.
Speaker 1 (16:43):
Okay, are you a little shocked that there are women
being followed around for thirty years for a case study
drinking coffee. That's a long That's quite impressive to me
that this they've been followed around for thirty years.
Speaker 3 (16:56):
Well, a lot of these studies, I mean, really, that's
what it takes sometimes and sometimes even longer.
Speaker 1 (17:02):
I just tend to believe it a little more. They've
been they've been doing their homework frankly for decades at
this point. So great. I'm certainly one of the gals
who likes to hear this. I drink I drink ice
espressed with the restraw every morning. I don't know, if
it'll be doing that late into my older age.
Speaker 3 (17:17):
But I don't mess with the caf Well, I drink
semi sweet tea and that's about all I drink.
Speaker 1 (17:24):
You literally never drink coffee.
Speaker 3 (17:26):
I mean and not I wouldn't say never, but not
every morning as every morning, and you know why. I mean,
I like coffee, but keeping it warm. I like sipping
on something. That's why coffee always goes cold.
Speaker 1 (17:38):
And then yeah, ice mind.
Speaker 3 (17:40):
So I just stick to my iced tea all day long.
And I carry you see, I carry a big old
gallon jug of tea everything huge. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (17:49):
Two does the uh rick rush over a weasel?
Speaker 3 (17:52):
He? Uh?
Speaker 1 (17:53):
And why one? Two? Five? He's a tea guy too,
and he's got a huge jug of tea, like the
only one that drinks coffee here.
Speaker 3 (18:00):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (18:01):
Well, I I mean I'm even adding powders that have mushroom,
you know all that. I'm putting all kinds of stuff
in my coffee.
Speaker 3 (18:10):
Yuck.
Speaker 1 (18:10):
Well, it's helping my brain, I'll tell you, that, is it. Yeah,
I don't even know. I at cordisse EPs and all this.
You know, some kind of crazy cinnamon ceylon cinnamon.
Speaker 3 (18:21):
And well, you need to do a thirty year study
and see if.
Speaker 1 (18:23):
That's really want case study for thirty years, I would
not sign up for that, Like, I'm just shocked. Well
follow me around for thirty years? Good lord, I know.
Speaker 3 (18:35):
That's kind of creepster, isn't it.
Speaker 1 (18:36):
I mean, are these people doing this for free? You
imagine someone coming up to you and saying, hey, we
want to study your habits every morning for the next
thirty years. I'd be like, are you paying me for that?
Speaker 3 (18:45):
No way, I don't know if they follow you that closely,
I think just to ask you did you Are you
a daily coffee drinker? And hey, come in, you know,
on a regular basis here, and you know, we'll record with.
Speaker 1 (18:59):
You, just to commit. I'm shocked to hear. But anyway,
and I'm happy to hear that. How many women out
there during coffee every day into their older ages.
Speaker 3 (19:06):
I don't know, Well, maybe those women are just committed
to helping humanity and enjoy their mourning.
Speaker 1 (19:11):
Coffee and are helping themselves do Apparently.
Speaker 3 (19:14):
So this guy was thinking outside the box. A Milwaukee
man is accused of trying to get a witness against
him deported by falsifying letters threatening President Trump prosecutors say
Dimitric Scott used victim Ramon Morales Reyes's name in threatening
letters sent a few weeks ago about assassinating President Trump.
(19:35):
Scott was charged yesterday with felony, witness intimidation, bail jumping,
and other related charges in addition to his armed robbery charges.
Morales Reyes carries a U visa and we'll see an
immigration judge today and could possibly be deported.
Speaker 1 (19:53):
And why was he framing this worker because you're on
a worker's visa.
Speaker 3 (19:59):
He was he was brought up on armed robbery charges
and he accused this witness against him. So there was
a witness against him in this armed robbery case. So
he falsified this assassination threat in the name of the witness.
Speaker 1 (20:17):
Good night.
Speaker 3 (20:19):
Yeah, I mean that's pretty evil.
Speaker 1 (20:21):
Good. I mean, this is where I don't have a
criminal mind.
Speaker 3 (20:24):
And then I'm like, what's a U visa? So a
you visa is a non immigrant visa for crime victims
in their immediate family members in the United States who
have suffered mental or physical abuse due to a qualifying crime,
and who are willing to help law enforcement investigate or
prosecute that crime.
Speaker 1 (20:42):
So does it sound like this person may have been
here without a visa, he's.
Speaker 3 (20:46):
Here on a U visa. Well, and that's what a
uvisa is.
Speaker 1 (20:50):
And I'm saying maybe he was granted a U visa
to be able to be some type of informant to
law enforcement.
Speaker 3 (20:57):
It sounds like he was a victim of another crime
and that he was cooperating with police. And then the
uvisa also says gives the non immigrant designation. So what
does that mean? So non immigrant status are people that
intend to return home eventually. So immigrant status is people
(21:19):
that intend to stay. Non immigrant status are people that
intend to return home at some point in time.
Speaker 1 (21:26):
I wonder how long he's been here and if he's
intending to turn home return home.
Speaker 3 (21:30):
Yeah, I mean, we don't know any of these things. Wow,
And you would hope that this immigration judge today, would
you know, would say, Okay, you've been a victim again.
Speaker 1 (21:39):
Yes, time to go. If he's no, it's not time
to Well, if you said he's immigrant or non immigrant,
meaning he's going back.
Speaker 3 (21:49):
He's here under a uvisa over a separate case where
I don't know the details. I'm when I look up
what a uvisa is, I assume that the guy has
suffered from another crime and he's cooperating from police and
they gave him a U visa. Now this guy comes
along and frames him as threatening President Trump because he's
(22:14):
a witness against him in a crime. So he frames
him and then now he has to go in front
of this immigration judge. So I'm saying, hopefully the immigration
judge will say, well, now you've been a victim again.
And I don't know you know all the details, but
I would hope from what we know that he's treated
fairly and not deported because he's been the victim of
(22:36):
this guy who was charged with armed robbery charges that
he was a witness against and then this guy in
his took his name and threatened President Trump to try
to get him to discredit him as a witness against him.
Speaker 1 (22:49):
Right, I would agree that he sounds like he's been
a victim now twice of crime. But the non immigrant
visa part of it is what I was wondering about.
So is it actually legal for this judge to deport
this guy because of non immigrant didn't you say non
imgrant was that they were going back under the U visa.
Speaker 3 (23:08):
At some point, So so.
Speaker 1 (23:10):
It is possible this guy gets the boot, whether it's
fair or not.
Speaker 3 (23:14):
I mean, if you're following the law, yeah, I mean
I don't know what the details are, but let's assume
that his U VISA is still valid and that he's
just been framed. That I would say the judge will
probably say, Okay, this is a setup. In case dismissed.
Speaker 2 (23:31):
Thanks for listening to the Charleston Morning Use podcast. Catch
Kelly and Blaze weekday mornings from six to nine.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Ridiculous History
History is beautiful, brutal and, often, ridiculous. Join Ben Bowlin and Noel Brown as they dive into some of the weirdest stories from across the span of human civilization in Ridiculous History, a podcast by iHeartRadio.