4-24-25 - 8am - Klaus Schwab Steps Down and 'T' Upset with the 'LBG'

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, Michael, if you live in New Mexico but work
in Colorado, you get to pay double taxes. That's what
happened to me when I moved to North Dakota for
my husband's job but still worked remotely in Colorado. I
got to pay taxes for both states.

Speaker 2 (00:15):
Yeah. See, I'd want to establish residents, which should be
very easy to do in New Mexico. But the problem is,
what really is my workplace? Because well, I might be
sitting in my little makeshift studio at the undisclosed location
in New Mexico. I'm actually broadcasting from here where I'm

(00:39):
sitting right now because I'm just feeding. I would just
be feeding from New Mexico into this studio to broadcast
out to all of you. So I don't think the
company would change. I think they'd look at it and
say that I can't do that. So all this chaos
that I've been talking about, something has happened that I
think is an example of the good side of the chaos,

(01:05):
and that is that this globalist house of cards that
has built up around us. You know, globalism is just
like progressivism. Globalism has slowly taken over the world, and
it's and that and and it's a house of cards.
And it's a house of cards because it's it's the
very foundation of globalism is a really shaky foundation. You

(01:30):
think about climate change or whatever bull crap you want
to call it, we know it's We know that climate
change is real, but we know that if man has
any you know, effect on that at all, it's deminimous. Uh.
We we know the whole concept of socialism has always
and will always fail basic law of economics, basic law

(01:51):
of human nature. So all of this attempt to globalize
everything is beginning to fall apart. And I think one
of the examples is the World Economic form. Klaus Schwab,
the unelected overlord of the globalists, the man who smiled

(02:11):
as he promised that you'd own nothing and be happy.
That guy has fallen. Not step down gracefully, not retired honorably.
He has fallen. He's gotten dragged out by a virtual
tidal wave of whistleblower allegations that are so shocking, so brazen,

(02:33):
that they really make a mockery of the moral superiority
that he's poked himself in for decades now. Prettymick fight
five quick points fright expand Kloshwab was forced out of
the WEF after whistleblowers exposed years of financial misconduct and

(02:57):
abusive power. Of course, what would you expect a globalist
to do. Two Leaf accounts revealed that Koushchwab had actually
used World Economic Forum funds for personal luxuries while he
was telling the rest of us how we had to

(03:18):
be austere and they had to control the world's economy
through globalist policies. Meanwhile, what's he doing? I mean, this
is so, it is so stereotypical of what socialist and
communists do. You little people, you need to suffer and
be austere while we live in the mansion. Number three,

(03:41):
he's got a replacement already. Peter brought back lat Moth
l Moth. I'm not sure how you pronounce it, don't
care how you pronounce it. He built a legacy at
Nessley that is marked by human rights violations and ruthless resourcepolies.

(04:02):
Nestley gigantic conglomerate. Number four, So one global is replaced
by another globalists. The fourth point, the leadership change signals
a deep I mean a really deep entrenchment of the
World Economic Forms agenda. This is not a shift in

(04:23):
direction or values. It's just an internal collapse. And the
fifth point I'd make is that I think countries ought
to start cutting ties with every single WEF driven initiative
in order to halt stop the spread of surveillance, corporate control,

(04:46):
digital oppression, the bastardization of free speech, the elimination of travel,
the whole austerity movement. There's a huge difference between believing
in economic growth and the kind of austerity. Look, many

(05:06):
of us like to live austere. Don't spend money. We
don't need to spend by quality versus quantity. I mean,
you know, but that's not what they're talking about. They
want you to live like poppers. They don't want you
to have nice things. They don't want you to be
able to do the things that they can do. They
don't want you to be able to travel to Oh

(05:27):
my gosh, you're going to destroy the planet. But the
realization is that we can't expect the globalists to let
one of their own go without some sort of cover up.
So in its really polished press releases, in all the
hush board meetings, they're trying to spend his departure as
a planned transition. But Despite all the pr fog that

(05:52):
they tried to put out there, the truth broke through.
He was forced out after an anonymous letter penned by
current and former World Economic Forum staff blew the lid
off this entire regime of excess, arrogance and utter abuse. Now,

(06:13):
according to those inside the belly of the Beast, he
was using junior staffers as personal cash couriers. They would
withdraw thousands of dollars for his own use, build luxury
in room massages to the World Economic Forums accountants accounts
not accounts accounts. I don't know whether they had happy

(06:35):
endings or not. I mean, I'm assume a globalist, if
you're going to get a really nice deep tissue massage,
might as well get a happy ending with it too.
Right now, His wife, Hilda perfect name for a globalist, right.

Speaker 1 (06:52):
She is.

Speaker 2 (06:56):
You talk about nepotism. She's a central fa you're in
the WEF's operations. She would arrange these lavish getaways disguised
as business trips, and together they used a I mean,
this is such a classic example of socialist, Marxist and communists.

(07:19):
They would use a multi million dollar World Economic owned
villa paid for by corporate donors. They'd use that as
their personal retreat. That's not a glitch, that's not just occasionally.
That was the system that was just taken as business
as usual. And while Schwab pampered himself on your dime,

(07:44):
because you know, we all ended up contributing to that
stupid thing. Well not say now. Since Trump, he continued
to preach just like a typical socialist, like a typical Marxist,
he would he would lavish himself with all of that
stuff while preaching austerity. To you, one of the worst

(08:06):
things that I'm in. They're all bad, but one of
the worst things in terms of pure economies was trying
to get the world to submit to stakeholder capitalism, the
idea that it's not the shareholders that the corporation is
responsible for or has a fiduciary responsibility to, it's all

(08:28):
these other stakeholders, you know, all these little constituent groups,
the mngos, you know, the precepts or the concepts of
things like THEI all of those became stakeholders. So corporations
became more concerned about their return on investment and what
they were doing to support their stakeholders as opposed to

(08:49):
supporting the people who actually put the money in the
company to make the company go, the shareholders. He pushed
the whole idea of digital IDs, central bank surveillance, THEOI,
the thing about the ESG tyranny, the climate log downs,
and that was all part of what the great recept

(09:11):
Do you think he cried when COVID hit, or do
you think he celebrated, or do you think if you
want to put your tenfoil hat on that they actually conspired.
But the minute COVID hit, he mobilized. In his own words,

(09:33):
I'm making this up. In his own words, COVID was
quote a narrow but unique window to revamp all aspects
of our societies. So how was he going to do that?
He called for stronger, more aggressive governments. He pushed for
a fourth Industrial Revolution. What was that Fourth Industrial Revolution?

(09:54):
Were not your work and your money, but your very
identity would be transformed. He had transformed everything. He actually
he actually fondly spoke of implantable microchips. He loved biometric monitoring.

(10:15):
He wanted AI artificial intelligence systems to run and govern
your life. And he wasn't joking, He wasn't theorizing. He
was planning. I haven't read his books, but I've read
synopsis of his books, and he outlined all of that.
His speech is, which you can find online, confirmed all

(10:35):
of it. The goal was not health, it wasn't equity,
it wasn't sustainability. The global goal was control every single
one of those things, whether it's stakeholder capitalism, digital ie
these central bank surveillance, esg, climate, COVID, vaccinations. I use

(10:58):
that word specifically, although the believing there as being vaccinations.
It was about and still is about global control. But
now the Wizard of Oz has been dragged out from
behind the curtain. The World Economic Forum Board, facing an
internal revolt and global scrutiny, met in crisis Easter weekend

(11:20):
and they out They kicked him out. But do you
think they repented? Do you think on Easter Sunday they repented?
Because I just find it interesting that they had their
meeting on Easter Sunday. But I digress. They chose a
swab's replacement, as I said, Uh, Peter Bryback the moth,

(11:40):
another globalist titan, and his corporate legacy is even darker
than Claus Schwap. You know, if if you've ever seen
a picture of him. He does look like kind of
like a James Bond villain. He looks like, you know,
a doctor evil of some sort. But if you don't
believe me, just wait to hear about his background. Interesting

(12:05):
that the media rarely mentions this guy now he is
the former when emphasized that he's the former CEO of Nesley.
But Nestle is the world's largest food and beverage conglomerate.
He said one time, and I quote, water is not

(12:25):
a human right now. He wasn't speaking metaphorically because under
his leadership, Nessley bought up global water rights everywhere. Why
because they wanted to extract billions in profits while towns
like Flint, Michigan member Flint choked on poison. So while

(12:47):
you know Klaus charge Schwab, while Klaus Swab dreamed of
digital prisons, Braybeck perfected resource monopolies. He wanted to commodify,
in words, make a commodity out of very basic human needs.

(13:07):
And then he wanted to lock down supply chains with
ruthless efficiency. So Nesley's global expansion under his watch wasn't
just about chocolate bars, or wasn't about instant coffee. It
was about building an empire between nineteen ninety seven and
two thousand and eight. Nesley's corporate history reads like some

(13:29):
sort of corporate dystopian novel. So let's go back to
two thousand and five, when a lawsuit was filed against
Nesley on behalf of trafficked children from Molly. Their claim
was that they were forced into slavery on cocoa plantations
on the Ivory Coast, plantations that Nessley sourced from. Now

(13:52):
the plane stalledge that Neslie not only knew about it,
but they were incentivizing cost cutting practices that actually led
to the forced child labor, led to beatings, years of
stolen childhood nasty. Of course, they of course they denied
any wrong dude, wrongdoing, but the accusations themselves were damning,

(14:12):
and they fought tooth and nail to avoid accountability. But
of course, you know what usually happens in these kinds
of things. Things get quietly settled. But go to the
Philippines union leader discatdoed for tuna, let a worker strike
against Nessley. This is also two thousand and five. Guess

(14:36):
what happened to the union leader, Well, he got assassinated,
shot twice in the chest. Just like his predecessor years before,
Nestley bring back the CEO never faced any consequences. There
was no outrage, no inquiries, just continue profits and promotions.
This is the man that now chairs the World Economic Form,

(15:02):
so let's let that sink in from them. The World
Economic Forum, facing their own internal chaos, facing the external
chaos that we now see happening all around the world,
is not going to reform. It's actually reloading. It's going
to double down. It's going to shed its old skin,
hoping that the cabal will deceive the world into believing

(15:24):
that somehow they've changed. But the core is still exactly
the same. The ideology is the same, the mission is
the same. You know that there was a time, a
long time, in a galaxy far far away, when the
World Economic Forum was a simple business forum started in

(15:45):
nineteen seventy one, came out of the European Management Forum.
It was intended to help European companies learn American style competitiveness.
But Schwab, ever, the megalomaniac, transformed that simple form into

(16:08):
a vehicle for social engineering on a worldwide scale. It
was just originally just trade talk, but it turned into
a shadow government for the twenty first century, one where billionaires,
unlected officials, self righteous celebrities gathered every single year in
DeVos to decide your future without asking any question about it.

(16:30):
And now the same machine's running. There's just a new
guy behind the wheel. But I don't think it's over.
Shraub's resignation is not a victory yet, but it is
an opening. It's a crack in the foundation. It's excuse me,

(16:51):
pardon me. I think this is a moment that we
ought to seize before they patch it over with a
bunch of corporate gobbledegook, because their system thrives in secrecy,
and it survives on compliance, thrives on secrecy, survives on compliance,
and it makes further inroads into our own government, into

(17:16):
our own corporate companies. Every time one of us shrugs
and says, well, that's just how it is. Well, if
I don't really, it's not really going to affect me.
It's not going to happen in my country, it's not
going to happen anywhere. No. I think it's time to
suffer all ties to this Cabala control. The United States

(17:40):
withdraw from the World Economic Form, as should all other countries.
Otherwise the globalist machine will just continue to march on
with Michael. I'm not sure you know this or not so.
I used to be an operations manager with deep Rock Water.
They were purchased by a company called GS Services of America.
At the time, they were the largest water delivery company

(18:02):
in the entire world. Nastlie just purchased.

Speaker 3 (18:05):
Them within the last according to a friend of mine,
within the last three or four months.

Speaker 2 (18:11):
Proud, I should tell you now you better run control
the water. Control the water, control the society. Be glad
you've got at least I'm glad at the end dis
closed location. At least I've got it. Well, the T

(18:34):
LGB T not very easy to scrape off. I even
other members of the alphabet community. I think they're kind
of getting fed up with the transgender militants. But when

(18:55):
you start taking away the T from LGBT, that's not
going to be very easy. A San Francisco woman and
a lesbian were caught in a sticker war after the
lesbian had on her car an LGB no T an

(19:16):
LGB sticker that got removed by the other woman. Now
I can only play like the first minute of this
because it's pretty much a funny argument when you think
about what they're arguing about, and there are no f

(19:37):
bombs until you get to the last fifteen seconds or
so of it. But we'll stop it before we get
to that. But let's just call the bully a resident.
So I guess we've reached the point where even if
you affirm homosexuality that I still hate speech if you

(20:02):
fail to also affirm the transsexual people that are really,
in my opinion, psychologically messed up. Which not to go
back and beat that dead horse, but the whole book
issue is to a certain degree about transgenderism. And it's

(20:25):
this whole idea that you wonder why a six year
old or a seven or eight year old suddenly we've
got a plethora of stories about three year olds claiming that,
I mean, they don't they don't they First of all,
they still believe, like they still believe in Santa Claus.

(20:45):
They still believe in the Easter Bunny. They might even
believe in the Great Pumpkin.

Speaker 4 (20:50):
I don't know.

Speaker 2 (20:52):
So if someone who believes in the Great Pumpkin or
the Easter Bunny or Santa Claus, how could they possibly
say to themselves that I really do know that I
would was born a boy. I'm not a girl. Well,
because they're being propagandized, they're being brainwashed. And gay people,
you know, there's there's a I think I follow them.

(21:14):
At least they appear in my feet occasionally. Gaze against
groomers on X Pretty interesting feed. If you want to
look at how most gay people feel about grooming these
young children, they're adamantly opposed to it. Well, here, uh,

(21:34):
you discover that even if you support or accept whatever
verb you want to use gay or homosexuality, that becomes
hate speech if you fail to affirm transgenderism. So the
lesbian had put the LGB minus the T sticker on

(21:55):
her car this past Sunday, according to the story, By Monday,
the Bernal Heights resident had taped a response to the
LGB sticker onto the car, which read, shame on you.
There is no community without the T LGBT. The owner
of the car then on Tuesday placed another sticker over
that taped note, which said free speech, to which the

(22:18):
resident added another note by midday over the sticker, which
she scraped off on Thursday, that read your hate speech
is not tolerated here. Well, makes my head spin. So
the residents attempt to tear off the LGB sticker left
an unsolent mess that illustrates kind of what liberals mean
by repressive tolerance. If you want your head to spin, listen,

(22:45):
listen to this.

Speaker 3 (22:48):
Hand.

Speaker 4 (22:49):
Hi, I don't.

Speaker 5 (22:53):
You don't tolerate me? Is what you're not tolerating.

Speaker 4 (22:55):
Don't tolerate people speech there.

Speaker 5 (23:00):
You don't get to tell me what hate speech is,
and you don't get to touch my car.

Speaker 4 (23:03):
It is he it's not hate speech. It's heat.

Speaker 5 (23:05):
Lesbian, gaymisexual is not hate speech, Yes it is.

Speaker 4 (23:08):
It's erasing the T.

Speaker 2 (23:10):
It's erasing the T, so therefore it's hate speech. Do
you understand that? Man, I'm just trying to help you
understand that. If you see an LGB sticker somewhere, I mean,
what part dragon? Do you understand? What part of the
rainbow represents which of the LGBTQ. I like, I'm not
sure which color goes with which letter?

Speaker 4 (23:30):
Do you?

Speaker 2 (23:31):
No?

Speaker 3 (23:31):
Never, I never thought about, honestly, not a clue.

Speaker 2 (23:33):
So now well, I wonder if it even does, if
there's any correlation, because now I've got to start looking
at the rainbow to make sure it's got all of
the colors, and it's not leaving a color eye because
that might be a hate that might be hate speech.

Speaker 5 (23:46):
The tea was never there to start with. It was
a made up thing fifteen years ago on. I don't
agree with it being added all our community.

Speaker 4 (23:54):
No, my community is made you're not recording this.

Speaker 6 (23:58):
You're not recording I ad it all because our community expanded.

Speaker 5 (24:02):
Your community expanded. I never accepted that. Well, then, I'm
a female who loves females. That's a lesbian.

Speaker 4 (24:08):
No, you're a female who hates me.

Speaker 5 (24:10):
No, you just made that up.

Speaker 4 (24:12):
That's what I have, a lesbian ex see the lesson
I love.

Speaker 2 (24:15):
That I haven't. I like man, I just have a
lesbian exclusive space. This is the chaos that I've been
referring to all morning. Now the LGBs are fighting the
t's and the teas are upset and they claim that
the LGBs are you know, that's hate speech and we

(24:35):
dropped the t because it was never part of our
community in the first place. And no, no, you're dropping
the tea is hate speech.

Speaker 6 (24:41):
Teams love a lesbians because they love women are because
they hate me.

Speaker 4 (24:45):
And there's a big difference.

Speaker 2 (24:46):
Set did you understand that. Did you get that?

Speaker 4 (24:49):
Who hates?

Speaker 6 (24:51):
No?

Speaker 5 (24:51):
You just made that up. That's what I have a
lesbian exsi.

Speaker 6 (24:55):
See, the lesbians love a lesbians because they love women
are because they hate me.

Speaker 2 (25:00):
You're a lesbian because you either love women or because
you hate men. So you, I guess you could be
a heterosexual, but you hate men, so you're a female heterosexual,
but you hate men, so therefore that makes you lesbian.
I see, I didn't realize that that was the definition
of a lesbian anymore. I don't understand anything anymore. I

(25:23):
should probably just stop there. I'm not quite sure where
the first F bomb starts in, but you get the chaos.

Speaker 3 (25:28):
And it is posted at Michael says go here dot
com if you want to watch that entire video, and
it's it's a fabulous thread because there's so many You
can see the stickers, you can see the reaction to
the stickers, the sticker on the sticker, the free speech sticker,
the LGBT sticker. It's a fascinating thread. Michael says, go
here dot com.

Speaker 2 (25:48):
And are you do you do you have a better
understanding of those communities? Now? Are you just more confused
like I am.

Speaker 3 (25:57):
I don't know if I'm happy to see see it,
but there's infighting amongst their own side, and I'm not
happy for that. But it's like, okay, now now you
can see what everybody else is having to deal with.

Speaker 2 (26:13):
It, and that makes me happy. Yeah. When when when
they start fighting among themselves and then it's like, well,
welcome to our world. Welcome to our political world, our
social world, our religious world. Welcome to the real world.

Speaker 3 (26:31):
We've got a chair for you. There's coffee and donuts
in the corner.

Speaker 2 (26:36):
Wait a minute, are they gluten free donuts?

Speaker 3 (26:40):
I might meet somebody for not getting gluten free?

Speaker 2 (26:42):
They glazed donuts? Or they cake donut? I mean are
they you know?

Speaker 3 (26:47):
Are they cream felt?

Speaker 2 (26:48):
Yeah? Oh well stop it, just stop it.

Speaker 3 (26:53):
You're the one that problem glazed?

Speaker 4 (26:56):
All right, squirrel and it.

Speaker 2 (27:02):
Squirrel's gone, but not forgotten. Judicial Watch keeps his memory
alive while reminding us that a government overgrown enough to
kill our pets is a frightening government. Indeed, YEP, New
York's Department of Environmental Conservation initially failed to comply with
a full YA request, but finally coughed up the documents. Thanks.
I'd love Judicial watch. They do great things, including this.

(27:25):
The incident report from the raid on Pine City, New
York resident Mark Longo's home shows that twelve twelve law
enforcement personnel were involved in the October thirty, twenty twenty
four operation to seize Peanut and iraku named Fred. The
records also show that Peanut Peanut was decapitated for rabies

(27:46):
analysis after a wildlife biologist who seized the animal from
Longo claimed to have been bitten on the thumb. However,
killing Peanut and Fred for rabies testing had evidently been
planned all along. Now it's not just about pets. It's
not just about you know, beean up the squirrel. No, no, no.

(28:07):
The incident report says this. It notes that both animals
were seized and transferred to redacted someplace on October thirty,
twenty twenty four. They also note that a firearm model
CT four two A, which is a semi automatic nine
AR fifteen style rifle. I think it's produced by Delta
Level Defense. I may be wrong about that, but that

(28:32):
nine milimeter AR fifteen was seized and sent to a
lab on October thirty, twenty twenty four. The form lists
the value of the animals and the firearm. As I remember,
you got a raccoon, you got a squirrel, and you
got an AR fifteen. What would you value that at

(28:53):
the government value to that zero? Now, the brush with
big government invading a home, it wasn't really fun. According
to the New York Post quote, they treated me like
I was a terrorist. They treated this ray as if
I was a drug dealer. They ransacked my entire house
for five hours. Fortunately, it is still possible to escape

(29:15):
from the tyrannical dystopia that is New York. You can
move to the tyrannical dystopia that is Colorado. But if
we lose the chaos, and if liberals consolidate power over
the federal government, it won't just be the squirrels and
the raccoons and the AR fifteens that are in trouble.
It'll be all of us.

Speaker 1 (29:37):
Michael, you better get the whole rainbow thing figured out.

Speaker 3 (29:40):
You know in the stadium took the tea off. Come on,
you can't do that. It's like saying for the the
color spectrum roig biz and taking.

Speaker 2 (29:50):
Off the s.

Speaker 3 (29:51):
You can't take off the filet It becomes roig bit.

Speaker 2 (29:55):
What is that? Well, how about this I think we
to add a B to the l G B t
Q I A plus B. What about beast reality. Let's
let's let's add that one in.

Speaker 3 (30:07):
But the plus just covered everything at the end.

Speaker 2 (30:10):
But see, and I think that's discriminatory because you get
lumped in with the plus. Maybe you're deserving of your
own lever. Oh would you want to be just? Oh
you're just instead of the executive producer of the situation
with Michael Brown, You're just plus, You're just an add on.

(30:37):
You're just, You're you're you.

Speaker 3 (30:39):
Don't even deserve You're right, I am far much more
than just an add on to the situation with Michael Brown.
I think people tune in to just hear me versus you.

Speaker 2 (30:50):
No, they tune in just waiting for you to at
some point make a fool of me. Yeah, that's what
they really tune in for.

Speaker 3 (30:57):
Yeah, we are we is It should be back on air?

Speaker 2 (31:02):
Oh, pro back of air.

Speaker 3 (31:03):
Oh you're in control of your own mic. That'd be
a first.

Speaker 2 (31:08):
So, speaking of chaos, The New York Times UH is
reporting that NPR National Public Radio. Now I recognize they
are a competitor, but I still am, pure principle oppose
them getting any taxpayer funding. Let's just play. Let let's
play opposites. I think the situation with Michael Brown ought

(31:30):
to get some taxpayer funding. I think I ought to
get a stipend every single month from you, the taxpayers.
I'm in fact, I'm tired of waiting on your VENMO transfers.
You haven't done a very good job of that, and
so I demand to get some taxpayer funding. So anyway,
The New York Times reports that again this is all

(31:51):
part of the chaos, has ordered its local affiliates to
contact their congressional reps and beg for their professional life
because recision recision is the revoking of already allocated funding
is about to happen. The memo says, engage your board members,
community advisory board, station volunteers, major supporters brought to you

(32:15):
by community partners, business leaders, and emergency officials. Why would
you contact emergency officials? Contact the local emergency managers, the
civil defense director, what for what who work with your station,
and ask them to communicate to Congress your opposition to recision.

(32:35):
They didn't really need to end the memo with a
scream emoji. I mean that was pretty apparent. The bell
has told at last, because, barring some sort of political miracle,
the era and I know it's not a lot, but
I don't care whether it's one thousand dollars of bazillion dollars,
the era of federal funding for NPR is about to end,

(32:59):
and that's creating chaos. You mean you might actually have to,
I don't know, operate or maybe change your name. I guess,
but not I guess you could still be public radio.
But you mean you might actually have to. Well, they
already advertise, they just disguise it as something else, as sponsors.

(33:20):
You know, I have sponsors, We do advertising. They might
have to, you know, really ramp up their telethons. Your
local pledge drives are going to get more frequent, more desperate,
and it's no longer morning edition in America. It's chaos

(33:41):
at NPR, and I absolutely am, equivocally love it