April 24, 2025 • 30 mins
Gregg Jarrett, Fox News Legal Analyst, joins us to talk about the efforts of the left to support the evil illegal immigrants killing American citizens. What legal rights do these people have? Are the Democrats right or is President Trump in the right?
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Coming up next our final News round Up and Information
Overload Hour.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
All right, News round Up, Information Overload Hour are toll
free numbers eight hundred and nine four one sean if
you want to be a part of the program. Now,
we would have thought that law fair would be long
dead and gone after the Biden administration and weaponized their
Department of Justice along with Merrick Garland, you know, hopefully.
And we got some pretty good news today Tulsi Gabbard
(00:27):
exposing three deep state criminals who have quote infiltrated America's
intelligence networks. She has referred the Intel officials to the
DOJ for prosecution over alleged leaks of classified information. But
we have got to restore constitutional order to the Department
of Justice so we have equal justice under the law,
(00:47):
equal application of our laws. We need to make sure
that the Department of Justice is not weaponized, the fbis
not weaponized or politicized, our intelligence communities not weaponized or politicized,
and we've got a clean house and restore them to
their former greatness. Now that is not an easy lift.
(01:08):
I'm sure many of these people are probably just trying
to hide in the woodwork and just wait out the
Trump administration, hoping another president that's willing to restart weaponization,
we'll get back in office. However, it's not stopped. Law
(01:28):
Fair is still very real. You see, with every effort
to Donald Trump, every executive order, every action that he's taken,
there is usually a legal challenge, and the legal challenge
is usually judge shop to a friendly venue of a
left wing judge, and there'll be a temporary restraining order
(01:49):
on whatever Trump's action is he has now I think
the number is five, maybe it's six. I don't remember
the final tally. The Supreme Court, for the most part,
with one exception, sideading with President Trump and his executive
authority and that battle and this is the left's way
of accomplishing that which they can't win electorally at the
(02:11):
ballot box, and that which they can't get done legislatively.
They use judicial activism, radical left judges and judge shopping
to get to accomplish that which the American people frankly
didn't vote for anyway. So the Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Drew Ensign filed the sealed motion requesting a seven day
(02:35):
State of the Judges Director for the US to provide
testimony documents that involved plans to retrieve Abrego. Garcia administrations
also seeking relief from having to file daily updates on
their progress, and lawyers for Garcia, by the way, I
wonder who's paying for them, filed a response and opposition
(02:55):
of the government's motion to halt the order. Anyway, is
that law fairs seems like it to me? Greg Jarrett,
Fox News legal analyst, best selling author. Ways, in, sir,
what are your thoughts?
Speaker 3 (03:06):
It is lawfair, And you and I have discussed over
the last two to three years.
Speaker 1 (03:12):
You know how the law fair would never end against
Donald Trump.
Speaker 3 (03:18):
I mean they, you know, filed criminal cases and civil cases.
Speaker 1 (03:21):
Against him to stop him from getting elected last November,
and then you and I talked on air how it
wasn't going to stop once he took office.
Speaker 3 (03:32):
I predicted he'd be sued within the first twenty four
hours and he was. And so right now, what happens
every time Trumps so much as sneezes are costs, Liberal
groups and Democrats rushed to the federal courts and they
sue in and it forces Trump and his Department of
(03:56):
Justice to play an interminable game of lack of And
you know these unconscidable plentive lawyers use two tactics. First
of all, they go judge shopping like it's half off
sale at Macy's. You know, the PLANETFFS may be in Texas,
but they rush to a favorable liberal judge in Washington, DC.
(04:17):
And of course the Supreme Court slap that down and
the judge James both were a case. Saytan, you didn't
have any power, authority or jurisdiction. Get rid of this case.
It's not yours, and he was embarrassed. The other thing
that they do is that they issue these universal nationwide injunctions,
(04:39):
which they have no authority to issue. You know, they're
roughly six hundred and seventy five lower federal district court judges.
Do you mean to say that any one of these
unelected judges, the lowest of low in the federal court system,
can counterman an override anything and everything. The elected president
(05:04):
of the United States says no, And in fact, even
liberal justices have long publicly railed against district judges issuing
federal injunctions. I think it may soon come to an end.
There is a Supreme Court hearing on May fifteenth related
to the birthright citizenship case, and it would appear that
(05:27):
the Supreme Court finally, belatedly will address this nonsense of
national injunctions by district court judges. And I would hope
they would finally put their foot down and say, sorry,
you can't do that.
Speaker 2 (05:43):
So I mean, now we have to spend time, money,
energy resources into defending what is clearly spelled out in
the Constitution, and that is the executive powers of the president.
There really is not a lot of ambiguity here. And
the fact that you can have judge like Bosburg, and
I believe in activist judge justice, you know, try and
(06:06):
take away that authority to me in and of itself,
is a major problem.
Speaker 3 (06:11):
Yeah, and I fault the Supreme Court. The Court has
offered only.
Speaker 4 (06:17):
Vague and ambiguous rulings so far. On deportations, the Court
said about a week ago, ten days ago, yes, before
being deported there must be quote judicial review, in other words,
to satisfy due process. But the justices didn't.
Speaker 3 (06:40):
Define what that means for people here illegally. Does it
mean that all ten or twelve million aliens get to
individually and fully litigate their cases in the same way
that legal citizens might, or is it a simple summary
to termination by a judge of illegal status sufficient to
(07:04):
satisfy due process, meaning that these cases can be expedited
deportation can quickly follow. I think that's the better course.
But regrettably the Supreme Court hasn't said. They have been
a model of opacity and evasion, which is why John
Roberts has been such a feckless Chief Justice. People should
(07:29):
understand that deportation is not a criminal prosecution within the
meaning of the Bill of Rights, So the Fifth Amendment
due process right is not the same. An illegal alien
does not have the same rights as citizens. Their rights
are very limited, and the Supreme Court needs to spell
(07:51):
it out.
Speaker 2 (07:52):
No, I think you're right about that. And you know
you wrote a column when the issue of the alien
enemies that came out, and you rightly pointed out and
you gave a great historic summary of this. Four prior
presidents had used this Act. A nineteen forty eight Supreme
Court decision that went very deep and hard in terms
(08:15):
of the president's authority to use that act. And even
more importantly to me is in that decision the Court
determined that once a president has made the decision, it
is not subject to judicial review. That is not a
small element in this case. And I got to imagine,
(08:36):
I mean, every Supreme Court justice when they're upper confirmation,
is asked about their belief in court precedence, and they
all give the same answer that they're big believers in it.
And it turns out many of them are not. That's
neither here nor there. And that's what was so surprising
that John Roberts wasn't even prompted, you know, weighed on
(08:58):
this and said, that's why we have an tell out system,
et cetera, et cetera, when he should have really been defending,
in my view, the precedence. Now he's had other opportunities
to weigh in as well. This seven to two decision
I thought was a disaster. And I think sam Alito,
you know, excoriating his colleagues was dead on accurate, and
Clarence Thomas joining with him.
Speaker 3 (09:18):
It was. But when you look at that you know order,
it's four sentences long.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
And it was done in eight hours at midnight one night,
and you know, I'm.
Speaker 3 (09:30):
Looking at it here in front of me, and honestly,
I've gone over it and over it and over it,
and I can't figure it out. And yeah, if a
person who's been a lawyer for you know, forty five
years can't figure out four simple sentences. Then there's something
truly wrong, you know. So I blame the Supreme Court.
(09:54):
They've got to clean up the mess that they have created.
You know, they need to further define what they mean
by judicial review. But this was a temporary hold on deportation.
The Justice I think wanted to buy time. We got
to figure out what to do. Let's buy some time.
We'll put a pause on this. And earlier, as you noted,
(10:19):
the Supreme Court stated the deportations could proceed under the
Alien Enemies Act as long as there's some sort of
judicial review. But you know, this sudden action, but the
Supreme Court is unusual. It's troubling. And to wonder Alito
and Thomas where I rate about it. You know, they
didn't give anybody on the government side, Trump side an
(10:41):
opportunity to even be her The Fifth Circuit below said, well,
we don't have jurisdiction. We're not going to intervene. So
why is the Supreme Court intervening when the lower courts
say we don't have jurisdiction? Makes no sense, It.
Speaker 2 (10:57):
Really doesn't make any sense. Quick break right back more
with Fox News legal analyst Greg Jarrett on the other
side than your calls coming up. All right, we continue
now with Greg Jarrett, Fox News Legal analysts, bestselling author.
What is the best way, I mean, how do we
expedite the president's decisions or is it just a process
that we're going to have to live with? In other words,
(11:17):
that Okay, the president will issue an executive action or
order and the left won't follow it. They'll go judge shopping,
they'll even go outside of the jurisdiction, which they got
called out on in one case, and they will get
their decision temporarily halt the president's actions with surfing his
(11:37):
authority as president's his constitutional authority, and then the process
then begins of taking it to the next court, the
Appella Court, and then hopefully making it to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court's not going to be able to punt
on the issue of the Alien Enemies Act. They're not
going to be able to punt. Ultimately, they're going to
have to deal with it.
Speaker 3 (11:56):
Yeah, they are, and they should have already go with it,
and they dealt with it in the those first case
upholding the Alien Enemies Act. With a proviso, but they
need to be more deliberate otherwise this game of whackable
will just continue in perpetuity. Which is why I say
(12:19):
this May fifteen Supreme Court hearing very unusual. They never
take cases for oral argument that late in the term.
But I think it is a golden opportunity, as I
said in my column a few days ago, for them
to put their foot down and stop these universal injunctions.
And if they do that, Sean, how.
Speaker 2 (12:41):
Would they do that? They just say this has got
to stop. Now. Congress can also act here. Congress would
have would be within their right and there is discussion and
legislation that they're putting on the table in the House,
and I believe in the Senate as well, and that
would prevent the weaponization or the law fair or these
lower court judges having the power to assert the constitutional
(13:05):
authority of a president.
Speaker 3 (13:06):
Yes, but good luck getting that past. You know, the filibuster.
There are ways to do it, but I wouldn't you know,
hold my breath, you'll pass out waiting for Congress. Now,
I think the better court course of action is, as
I say, a Supreme Court to issue a ruling sometime
before the summer recess, meaning around July first, saying knock
(13:30):
it off, no more nationwide injunctions by district court judges.
You know, it is a modern invention that really never
happened before the mid to late twentieth century. Federal district
judges knew they had no power to do that, but
slowly but surely a few decided, let me test this,
(13:54):
and the Supreme Court failed or refused to slap him down. Well,
it's gotten out of control. These injunctions are epidemic, and
the court system will be absolutely overwhelmed, and the executive
branch will be brought to a screeching halt unless John
Roberts and the Supreme Court stops it.
Speaker 2 (14:17):
I can't say it any better. That's why you're the expert,
Greg Jarrett. Appreciate you being with us. Always appreciate your insight,
my friend, Thank you.
Speaker 3 (14:25):
Thanks, Sean, appreciate it.
Speaker 2 (14:26):
Eight hundred and nine four one, sewn on number. You
want to be a part of the program, I'm twenty
five now until the top of the hour, eight hundred
nine four one, Sean. If you want to be a
part of the program, listen, let me tell you about this.
A US Army vet named Brian with his family viciously
attacked by a guy with a steel pipe. His life's
in jeopardy. Obviously in this case was forced to defend
(14:50):
himself and his family with his firearm. He's the one
that ends up getting charged with first degree murder and
put in jail. As he was being dragged off in handcuffed,
he did remember he had a USCCA membership. And I
tell you this because it's one of the many reasons
that I am a proud and have been a proud
member of the UFCCA for over nine years. And they
(15:12):
also offer defense liability insurance. In other words, that God
forbid moment happens and you have to protect your life
or the life of your family, or the life of
your employees, they will have your back and they'll have
an army behind you so that you can defend yourself.
Otherwise you're out on your own. Good luck. And by
the way, now it's the perfect time to check out
(15:32):
the USCCA. They are offering all of you, no obligation,
six chances to win twelve hundred bucks for a free
new firearm. You simply go to their website, Defendfamily dot com.
Right now you enter, you get six chances to win
the gun of your choice. And also they have a
membership offer for you, my listeners, proud member nine years.
(15:55):
This is a great organization. Hundreds and hundreds of thousands
of us count on the USCCA. Just go to Defendfamily
dot Com today. All right, So earlier today the president,
I mean, how refreshing it is that we have a
president that actually talks to the press and can speak coherently.
You would think the press would love him, but they
(16:16):
still hate him anyway. So he was with the leader
of Norway today and he spent a lot of time
discussing his efforts to end the Russia Ukraine War. Now
they are getting to a point here where it's, you know,
Adam Schiffer, get off the pot. It's either they're going
to do this deal or they're not going to do
this deal. And I'm watching a lot of conservative hawks
(16:40):
making the case, oh, this is terrible. Donald Trump is
giving in to Putin and he's gonna the annexation of
Crimea happened in twenty fourteen. They've already lost a significant
portion of their population. They're running out of not only firepower,
but of men to fight this war. Many people have
(17:02):
fled and if they want the opportunity to rebuild their country,
they they have it. It's it's not the greatest deal.
Does it reward you know, somebody like Plutin, who I
think is an you know, evil murdering dictator who had
no business starting this and beginning this and if he
had territorial claims, there were far better ways to discuss them. Yeah,
(17:23):
I do. Anyway, the President in the Oval Office from
earlier today, we spoke about trade.
Speaker 5 (17:29):
And we understand each other very well. I think we'll
have no problems.
Speaker 6 (17:33):
Do you think, I think, well, no problem whatsoever with Norway?
Speaker 5 (17:40):
Right, you can discuss visit the president. We didn't, but
I would.
Speaker 7 (17:45):
I love it.
Speaker 5 (17:45):
I mean, I've been there and it is a beautiful
place they have.
Speaker 8 (17:50):
So I told the President that, you know, he is
receiving us early in the term.
Speaker 5 (17:54):
He's welcome to me, said Norway, and we would like
to have him.
Speaker 8 (17:57):
And it will be another way of emphasizing the strong differentship.
Speaker 5 (18:04):
No one has been a staunch supporter of Ukraine.
Speaker 9 (18:07):
I've seen the Russian invasions within twenty two Has something.
Speaker 10 (18:12):
Being discussed here today that have may have altered you.
Speaker 6 (18:17):
On things no, we want to very simply, I have
no allegiance to anybody.
Speaker 5 (18:22):
I have allegiance to.
Speaker 6 (18:23):
Saving lives, and I want to save a lot of lives,
a lot of young people's mostly young people.
Speaker 5 (18:28):
It's the war, it's the soldiers, and if we can
do that.
Speaker 6 (18:32):
Also, as you know, I got started because the money
that's been spent on this war is insane. It should
have never happened, and it would have never happened if
I were president. But Biden spent three hundred and fifty
billion dollars on this and it's a shame.
Speaker 5 (18:49):
And that's what got me involved. And then I looked
at and I see the results. It's horrible.
Speaker 6 (18:55):
It's a killing field five thousand soldiers a week on average,
and we want to stop that. We both want to
stop that for a lot of reasons. But I would
say that is my number one reasons that.
Speaker 10 (19:12):
People get Russia to it to accept the deal, but
also Ukraine and Europe.
Speaker 5 (19:17):
Is I think Solia I do.
Speaker 6 (19:19):
I believe they will accept and I think we're going
to get this over with.
Speaker 5 (19:23):
I hope so soon.
Speaker 3 (19:28):
Continue to lack support from Nay two dollars and your
goal of obtaining greenland how will you proceed if you
don't get that support.
Speaker 6 (19:35):
Well, Greenland is going to be interesting with us for
another day. I think we need that for international peace,
and if you don't have that, I think it's a
big threat to our world. So I think Greenland is
very important for international piece.
Speaker 5 (19:48):
Yeah, please go ahead.
Speaker 9 (19:49):
For President, I should proposed use the words Vladimir's stop.
That seemed like a slightly different message of personal message.
What is your love frustration with President Putter?
Speaker 5 (20:01):
I didn't like last night.
Speaker 6 (20:03):
I wasn't happy with it, and we're in the midst
of talking peace and missiles were.
Speaker 5 (20:08):
Fired and I was not happy with it.
Speaker 6 (20:11):
That's what I meant, and that's you know what I.
Speaker 5 (20:16):
Assume that's what you mean. I keep falling.
Speaker 9 (20:20):
Will you consider additional sanctions toward Russia? Or what will
you do if President Putin?
Speaker 6 (20:25):
I'd rather answer that question in a week. I want
to see if we can have a deal. No reason
to answer it now, but I won't be happy. Let
me put it that way, things will happen. Pressure putting
a lot of pressure. You don't know what pressure I'm
putting on Russia.
Speaker 5 (20:42):
They're dealing. You have no idea what pressure I'm putting
in Russia.
Speaker 6 (20:45):
We're putting a lot of pressure. We're putting a lot
of pressure on Russia, and Russia was adding. Some people
that are close to it know or he wouldn't be
talking right now. The Prime Minister understands that better than anybody.
He wouldn't be talking right now. He's talking and we're
putting a lot of pressure. I think he wants to
make a deal. We're gonna find out very soon. But
it takes two to tango, so I think that they
(21:08):
both want piece right now.
Speaker 5 (21:09):
They're ready to do something. We'll see what happens.
Speaker 6 (21:12):
Complicated, very complicated, but I think they are both very
much looking to make a deal.
Speaker 5 (21:18):
Marko, what would you say, Well, first.
Speaker 11 (21:20):
Of all, what was put before our partners was options
to discuss about things that it would take to end
a war.
Speaker 7 (21:26):
This war is endable. Both sides just have to agree
to it.
Speaker 11 (21:29):
We've shown them a pathway forward. We've discussed those ideas.
There was a good meeting yesterday, There'll be good meetings
over the weekend.
Speaker 7 (21:34):
We've shown them the finish line. We need both of
them to say yes.
Speaker 11 (21:37):
But what happened last night with those missile strikes should
remind everybody of why this war needs to end. It's
horrible those missiles land that It's even worse is there
are today people that were alive yesterday that are not
alive today because this war continues and the President wants
to stop it.
Speaker 7 (21:50):
And everyone should be thanking the President for being a peacemaker.
Speaker 11 (21:52):
And trying to save lives. That's what we're trying to
do here. It's not our war. We didn't start it,
you know, but we're trying to end the dying. We're
trying to end the destruction, and we've shown the path forward.
Speaker 7 (22:04):
We can see the finish line. But both of them
have to get there.
Speaker 11 (22:06):
We're going to do everything we can to help them
get there, but they have to ultimately say yes.
Speaker 6 (22:09):
But we are using a lot of pressure on both
you know, if you think we're just in there because
we're nice people, and we are nice people, but we're
using a lot of pressure.
Speaker 5 (22:18):
What concessions to president in your national security team? What
concessions has.
Speaker 9 (22:23):
Russell offered up thus far to get to the point
where you're closer to peace.
Speaker 6 (22:28):
Stopping the war, stopping taking the whole country.
Speaker 5 (22:33):
Pretty big concession present if you are going to take
that tires. What do you want Norway to buy more
from the US to buy more?
Speaker 6 (22:48):
Well, you don't need snow, you don't need skis. You
don't need ski champions either, right, you.
Speaker 5 (22:53):
Have a lot of them. We just want to keep
the relationship the way it is we have.
Speaker 6 (22:59):
We've had a relationship I think now maybe closer than ever,
but we've had a great relationship with Norway.
Speaker 5 (23:05):
I think just keep it the way it is. Get
you can't do better.
Speaker 6 (23:11):
If they want to give us some additional concessions, that's
something you can't do much better.
Speaker 5 (23:15):
Yes, yes, Normay.
Speaker 7 (23:18):
Say you said that, do a lot of things right,
but aren't the Ukraine? If I can ask for you
than the Prime Minister, if.
Speaker 10 (23:25):
You find a common ground today on Ukraine and the
peace plan, totally it's totally common Granted the Prime Minister
can speak about it, but I can just say he
wants to see people.
Speaker 6 (23:36):
Stop dying more than anything else, and they'd like to
see it, and it's going to help us end it.
Speaker 8 (23:45):
I'm trying to say that to move towards an end
of this war, US engagement is critical and President Trump
made that possible.
Speaker 5 (23:54):
That is clear.
Speaker 8 (23:55):
That is all it's it's really happening now. The important
thing is that both parts just have to know that
they have to deliver, and they have to feel the
pressure to deliver.
Speaker 5 (24:06):
You deserve the peace for us? Do I deserveth.
Speaker 1 (24:11):
Well?
Speaker 6 (24:11):
Maybe for the Abraham Accords. I don't want to get
ahead of myself in this one. But they say for
the Abraham Accords. And by the way, speaking of that,
we're going to be filling it up. A lot of
countries want to come into the Abraham accuurdse. You know,
we have four and Biden did nothing on that one too,
and it's the same four. But they're great countries and
they were brave doing it, and it's worked out very well.
(24:33):
And we're going to be filling up the Abraham Accords.
They're going to be I think, filling it.
Speaker 5 (24:38):
Up marketing very rapidly. Could you say something about that.
Speaker 11 (24:42):
There's great enormous opportunity to grow the Abraham Accords.
Speaker 7 (24:45):
But I would just point to one thing.
Speaker 11 (24:47):
Of all the leaders in the world today, no leader
is working harder to prevent wars or in them. The
President trumpets right now, we're trying. That's why we're talking
to Iran. That's why we're engaged with Ukraine and Russia.
It's the desire to prevent these wars from breaking out
and the ones that exist already. And again, I just
think it's tremendous for our country to be led by
a president who desires to bring peace and establish peace
(25:08):
and protect piece.
Speaker 5 (25:09):
So it's hard work.
Speaker 6 (25:13):
You know, Marco just mentioned something that maybe we should
talk about for just a second, and we could miss
the Prime Minister. And you're involved in it too, because
you've been well involved in the world and peace. But
I think we're doing very well with respect to Iran,
and we're having very serious meetings.
Speaker 5 (25:33):
And there are only two options, and one option is
not a good option.
Speaker 6 (25:38):
It's not a not a good option at all.
Speaker 5 (25:42):
And I think we're doing very.
Speaker 6 (25:44):
Well on an agreement with RN but that one we're
doing a lot of things, I will say, but.
Speaker 5 (25:50):
That one is well.
Speaker 6 (25:52):
In this way, we could have a very very good
decision and a lot of lives will be saved Therein
the present money economy, there was a slow down as
it relates to home sales in the month of March.
Speaker 5 (26:06):
The slowest pace. It's two dollars and nine. Is that
an economic indicator, and perhaps the Treasury Secretary can weigh
in on this as well.
Speaker 4 (26:13):
Is that an economic indicator that can concerns you about
the broader US?
Speaker 6 (26:17):
Now, they had very good numbers on housing today, extremely
good numbers. And that's despite interest rates. Because you know,
if you look at what happened, everyone said, Oh, I said,
I was going to get prices down.
Speaker 5 (26:28):
I did.
Speaker 6 (26:29):
Energy just hit one dollar and ninety eight cents in
a couple of states.
Speaker 5 (26:33):
It's way down.
Speaker 6 (26:34):
Energy is down, and we're about sixty four dollars a
barrel when I came in and we were looking at
eighty nine ninety ninety five dollars.
Speaker 5 (26:41):
And by the way, that helps us solve the war too.
Speaker 6 (26:44):
Having those energy prices is a big, a big incentive
for Russia to also agree with solving the war problem.
Speaker 5 (26:52):
Groceries are down.
Speaker 6 (26:54):
When I was with you two months ago, you were
you were complaining about eggs. I said, I just got here.
I've been here for I was here for about a week.
When the press started saying about eggs have gone through
the roof. I said, I just got here. Tell me
about eggs. And they happened, They went through the roof,
and you couldn't get them. So we just had a
big Easter egg hunt at the White House, thousands and
(27:16):
thousands of eggs and the price was down eighty seven percent.
So we did a great job. Housing is doing very well.
We should lower interest rates, that's the FED. I hope
they lower interest rates. That's a smart thing to do.
Be ahead a little bit, although already it's a little
bit late. But in the end, we just have a
great country, a very strong country.
Speaker 5 (27:37):
And we have every other country.
Speaker 6 (27:39):
I can't think of one country that doesn't want to
negotiate a deal, and they either negotiate a deal or
we set a deal that we think is fair because
we don't have to go through all of these it
would be physically impossible.
Speaker 5 (27:53):
You know.
Speaker 6 (27:53):
You have so many people that really understand it, which
is a very small group of people here, and we
are going to at some point just set prices for deals.
Some will be tariffed, some treated us very unfairly. They'll
be tariffed higher than others. But we've been ripped off
for many, many years. The United States has been ripped
(28:14):
off like no country probably in the history of.
Speaker 5 (28:16):
The world, has been ripped off.
Speaker 6 (28:17):
For forty five fifty years, and countries have gotten rich.
Speaker 5 (28:22):
By doing that.
Speaker 6 (28:23):
With the United States, we've taken care of their militaries,
and military is another subject we talk about. We're not
going to make that subject to any of the deals.
But you know, you know the same countries that I do,
where we virtually take care of their military and then
they don't get treated fairly on trade. So the people,
and I don't blame those countries. I blame the people
that set at that beautiful desk right behind you, because
(28:46):
those people didn't do the job for this country, and
they let us lose four billion dollars a day on trade.
We were losing four or five billion dollars a day
on trade when I got here, and now we're going
to be much better than breaking even, and we're going
to be making four or five billion dollars a day
on trade. So but I don't blame any country. Not
(29:10):
the worst time, and we.
Speaker 5 (29:11):
Were abused by countries.
Speaker 6 (29:13):
I blamed the President of the United States that happened
to be sitting where these deals were made disgraceful.
Speaker 5 (29:20):
When I was here, we had a great four years.
We had the most successful.
Speaker 6 (29:23):
Economy in the history of our country. My first term,
and we were very tough on trade and with China.
As you know, they paid hundreds of billions of dollars
in tariffs, but nobody else ever did that. China paid
not ten cents to any other president and they but
not only China, virtually every country got away with murder.
Speaker 5 (29:44):
And we just can't let that happen. Thank you very much, everybody,
Thank you very much.
Speaker 2 (29:50):
All right, that was President Trump from the Oval Office.
Earlier today with they had of Norway and I spent
a lot of time talking about Ukraine. And that's been
the wrapplings up with today. We will be back tomorrow
all the news information that you will never get from
the state run legacy media mob. Don't forget Hannity nine
Eastern on Fox at you DVR. Have a great night.
(30:11):
We'll see you tonight. Back here tomorrow. Thank you for
making this show possible.
Coming up next our final News round Up and Information
Overload Hour.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
All right, News round Up, Information Overload Hour are toll
free numbers eight hundred and nine four one sean if
you want to be a part of the program. Now,
we would have thought that law fair would be long
dead and gone after the Biden administration and weaponized their
Department of Justice along with Merrick Garland, you know, hopefully.
And we got some pretty good news today Tulsi Gabbard
(00:27):
exposing three deep state criminals who have quote infiltrated America's
intelligence networks. She has referred the Intel officials to the
DOJ for prosecution over alleged leaks of classified information. But
we have got to restore constitutional order to the Department
of Justice so we have equal justice under the law,
(00:47):
equal application of our laws. We need to make sure
that the Department of Justice is not weaponized, the fbis
not weaponized or politicized, our intelligence communities not weaponized or politicized,
and we've got a clean house and restore them to
their former greatness. Now that is not an easy lift.
(01:08):
I'm sure many of these people are probably just trying
to hide in the woodwork and just wait out the
Trump administration, hoping another president that's willing to restart weaponization,
we'll get back in office. However, it's not stopped. Law
(01:28):
Fair is still very real. You see, with every effort
to Donald Trump, every executive order, every action that he's taken,
there is usually a legal challenge, and the legal challenge
is usually judge shop to a friendly venue of a
left wing judge, and there'll be a temporary restraining order
(01:49):
on whatever Trump's action is he has now I think
the number is five, maybe it's six. I don't remember
the final tally. The Supreme Court, for the most part,
with one exception, sideading with President Trump and his executive
authority and that battle and this is the left's way
of accomplishing that which they can't win electorally at the
(02:11):
ballot box, and that which they can't get done legislatively.
They use judicial activism, radical left judges and judge shopping
to get to accomplish that which the American people frankly
didn't vote for anyway. So the Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Drew Ensign filed the sealed motion requesting a seven day
(02:35):
State of the Judges Director for the US to provide
testimony documents that involved plans to retrieve Abrego. Garcia administrations
also seeking relief from having to file daily updates on
their progress, and lawyers for Garcia, by the way, I
wonder who's paying for them, filed a response and opposition
(02:55):
of the government's motion to halt the order. Anyway, is
that law fairs seems like it to me? Greg Jarrett,
Fox News legal analyst, best selling author. Ways, in, sir,
what are your thoughts?
Speaker 3 (03:06):
It is lawfair, And you and I have discussed over
the last two to three years.
Speaker 1 (03:12):
You know how the law fair would never end against
Donald Trump.
Speaker 3 (03:18):
I mean they, you know, filed criminal cases and civil cases.
Speaker 1 (03:21):
Against him to stop him from getting elected last November,
and then you and I talked on air how it
wasn't going to stop once he took office.
Speaker 3 (03:32):
I predicted he'd be sued within the first twenty four
hours and he was. And so right now, what happens
every time Trumps so much as sneezes are costs, Liberal
groups and Democrats rushed to the federal courts and they
sue in and it forces Trump and his Department of
(03:56):
Justice to play an interminable game of lack of And
you know these unconscidable plentive lawyers use two tactics. First
of all, they go judge shopping like it's half off
sale at Macy's. You know, the PLANETFFS may be in Texas,
but they rush to a favorable liberal judge in Washington, DC.
(04:17):
And of course the Supreme Court slap that down and
the judge James both were a case. Saytan, you didn't
have any power, authority or jurisdiction. Get rid of this case.
It's not yours, and he was embarrassed. The other thing
that they do is that they issue these universal nationwide injunctions,
(04:39):
which they have no authority to issue. You know, they're
roughly six hundred and seventy five lower federal district court judges.
Do you mean to say that any one of these
unelected judges, the lowest of low in the federal court system,
can counterman an override anything and everything. The elected president
(05:04):
of the United States says no, And in fact, even
liberal justices have long publicly railed against district judges issuing
federal injunctions. I think it may soon come to an end.
There is a Supreme Court hearing on May fifteenth related
to the birthright citizenship case, and it would appear that
(05:27):
the Supreme Court finally, belatedly will address this nonsense of
national injunctions by district court judges. And I would hope
they would finally put their foot down and say, sorry,
you can't do that.
Speaker 2 (05:43):
So I mean, now we have to spend time, money,
energy resources into defending what is clearly spelled out in
the Constitution, and that is the executive powers of the president.
There really is not a lot of ambiguity here. And
the fact that you can have judge like Bosburg, and
I believe in activist judge justice, you know, try and
(06:06):
take away that authority to me in and of itself,
is a major problem.
Speaker 3 (06:11):
Yeah, and I fault the Supreme Court. The Court has
offered only.
Speaker 4 (06:17):
Vague and ambiguous rulings so far. On deportations, the Court
said about a week ago, ten days ago, yes, before
being deported there must be quote judicial review, in other words,
to satisfy due process. But the justices didn't.
Speaker 3 (06:40):
Define what that means for people here illegally. Does it
mean that all ten or twelve million aliens get to
individually and fully litigate their cases in the same way
that legal citizens might, or is it a simple summary
to termination by a judge of illegal status sufficient to
(07:04):
satisfy due process, meaning that these cases can be expedited
deportation can quickly follow. I think that's the better course.
But regrettably the Supreme Court hasn't said. They have been
a model of opacity and evasion, which is why John
Roberts has been such a feckless Chief Justice. People should
(07:29):
understand that deportation is not a criminal prosecution within the
meaning of the Bill of Rights, So the Fifth Amendment
due process right is not the same. An illegal alien
does not have the same rights as citizens. Their rights
are very limited, and the Supreme Court needs to spell
(07:51):
it out.
Speaker 2 (07:52):
No, I think you're right about that. And you know
you wrote a column when the issue of the alien
enemies that came out, and you rightly pointed out and
you gave a great historic summary of this. Four prior
presidents had used this Act. A nineteen forty eight Supreme
Court decision that went very deep and hard in terms
(08:15):
of the president's authority to use that act. And even
more importantly to me is in that decision the Court
determined that once a president has made the decision, it
is not subject to judicial review. That is not a
small element in this case. And I got to imagine,
(08:36):
I mean, every Supreme Court justice when they're upper confirmation,
is asked about their belief in court precedence, and they
all give the same answer that they're big believers in it.
And it turns out many of them are not. That's
neither here nor there. And that's what was so surprising
that John Roberts wasn't even prompted, you know, weighed on
(08:58):
this and said, that's why we have an tell out system,
et cetera, et cetera, when he should have really been defending,
in my view, the precedence. Now he's had other opportunities
to weigh in as well. This seven to two decision
I thought was a disaster. And I think sam Alito,
you know, excoriating his colleagues was dead on accurate, and
Clarence Thomas joining with him.
Speaker 3 (09:18):
It was. But when you look at that you know order,
it's four sentences long.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
And it was done in eight hours at midnight one night,
and you know, I'm.
Speaker 3 (09:30):
Looking at it here in front of me, and honestly,
I've gone over it and over it and over it,
and I can't figure it out. And yeah, if a
person who's been a lawyer for you know, forty five
years can't figure out four simple sentences. Then there's something
truly wrong, you know. So I blame the Supreme Court.
(09:54):
They've got to clean up the mess that they have created.
You know, they need to further define what they mean
by judicial review. But this was a temporary hold on deportation.
The Justice I think wanted to buy time. We got
to figure out what to do. Let's buy some time.
We'll put a pause on this. And earlier, as you noted,
(10:19):
the Supreme Court stated the deportations could proceed under the
Alien Enemies Act as long as there's some sort of
judicial review. But you know, this sudden action, but the
Supreme Court is unusual. It's troubling. And to wonder Alito
and Thomas where I rate about it. You know, they
didn't give anybody on the government side, Trump side an
(10:41):
opportunity to even be her The Fifth Circuit below said, well,
we don't have jurisdiction. We're not going to intervene. So
why is the Supreme Court intervening when the lower courts
say we don't have jurisdiction? Makes no sense, It.
Speaker 2 (10:57):
Really doesn't make any sense. Quick break right back more
with Fox News legal analyst Greg Jarrett on the other
side than your calls coming up. All right, we continue
now with Greg Jarrett, Fox News Legal analysts, bestselling author.
What is the best way, I mean, how do we
expedite the president's decisions or is it just a process
that we're going to have to live with? In other words,
(11:17):
that Okay, the president will issue an executive action or
order and the left won't follow it. They'll go judge shopping,
they'll even go outside of the jurisdiction, which they got
called out on in one case, and they will get
their decision temporarily halt the president's actions with surfing his
(11:37):
authority as president's his constitutional authority, and then the process
then begins of taking it to the next court, the
Appella Court, and then hopefully making it to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court's not going to be able to punt
on the issue of the Alien Enemies Act. They're not
going to be able to punt. Ultimately, they're going to
have to deal with it.
Speaker 3 (11:56):
Yeah, they are, and they should have already go with it,
and they dealt with it in the those first case
upholding the Alien Enemies Act. With a proviso, but they
need to be more deliberate otherwise this game of whackable
will just continue in perpetuity. Which is why I say
(12:19):
this May fifteen Supreme Court hearing very unusual. They never
take cases for oral argument that late in the term.
But I think it is a golden opportunity, as I
said in my column a few days ago, for them
to put their foot down and stop these universal injunctions.
And if they do that, Sean, how.
Speaker 2 (12:41):
Would they do that? They just say this has got
to stop. Now. Congress can also act here. Congress would
have would be within their right and there is discussion and
legislation that they're putting on the table in the House,
and I believe in the Senate as well, and that
would prevent the weaponization or the law fair or these
lower court judges having the power to assert the constitutional
(13:05):
authority of a president.
Speaker 3 (13:06):
Yes, but good luck getting that past. You know, the filibuster.
There are ways to do it, but I wouldn't you know,
hold my breath, you'll pass out waiting for Congress. Now,
I think the better court course of action is, as
I say, a Supreme Court to issue a ruling sometime
before the summer recess, meaning around July first, saying knock
(13:30):
it off, no more nationwide injunctions by district court judges.
You know, it is a modern invention that really never
happened before the mid to late twentieth century. Federal district
judges knew they had no power to do that, but
slowly but surely a few decided, let me test this,
(13:54):
and the Supreme Court failed or refused to slap him down. Well,
it's gotten out of control. These injunctions are epidemic, and
the court system will be absolutely overwhelmed, and the executive
branch will be brought to a screeching halt unless John
Roberts and the Supreme Court stops it.
Speaker 2 (14:17):
I can't say it any better. That's why you're the expert,
Greg Jarrett. Appreciate you being with us. Always appreciate your insight,
my friend, Thank you.
Speaker 3 (14:25):
Thanks, Sean, appreciate it.
Speaker 2 (14:26):
Eight hundred and nine four one, sewn on number. You
want to be a part of the program, I'm twenty
five now until the top of the hour, eight hundred
nine four one, Sean. If you want to be a
part of the program, listen, let me tell you about this.
A US Army vet named Brian with his family viciously
attacked by a guy with a steel pipe. His life's
in jeopardy. Obviously in this case was forced to defend
(14:50):
himself and his family with his firearm. He's the one
that ends up getting charged with first degree murder and
put in jail. As he was being dragged off in handcuffed,
he did remember he had a USCCA membership. And I
tell you this because it's one of the many reasons
that I am a proud and have been a proud
member of the UFCCA for over nine years. And they
(15:12):
also offer defense liability insurance. In other words, that God
forbid moment happens and you have to protect your life
or the life of your family, or the life of
your employees, they will have your back and they'll have
an army behind you so that you can defend yourself.
Otherwise you're out on your own. Good luck. And by
the way, now it's the perfect time to check out
(15:32):
the USCCA. They are offering all of you, no obligation,
six chances to win twelve hundred bucks for a free
new firearm. You simply go to their website, Defendfamily dot com.
Right now you enter, you get six chances to win
the gun of your choice. And also they have a
membership offer for you, my listeners, proud member nine years.
(15:55):
This is a great organization. Hundreds and hundreds of thousands
of us count on the USCCA. Just go to Defendfamily
dot Com today. All right, So earlier today the president,
I mean, how refreshing it is that we have a
president that actually talks to the press and can speak coherently.
You would think the press would love him, but they
(16:16):
still hate him anyway. So he was with the leader
of Norway today and he spent a lot of time
discussing his efforts to end the Russia Ukraine War. Now
they are getting to a point here where it's, you know,
Adam Schiffer, get off the pot. It's either they're going
to do this deal or they're not going to do
this deal. And I'm watching a lot of conservative hawks
(16:40):
making the case, oh, this is terrible. Donald Trump is
giving in to Putin and he's gonna the annexation of
Crimea happened in twenty fourteen. They've already lost a significant
portion of their population. They're running out of not only firepower,
but of men to fight this war. Many people have
(17:02):
fled and if they want the opportunity to rebuild their country,
they they have it. It's it's not the greatest deal.
Does it reward you know, somebody like Plutin, who I
think is an you know, evil murdering dictator who had
no business starting this and beginning this and if he
had territorial claims, there were far better ways to discuss them. Yeah,
(17:23):
I do. Anyway, the President in the Oval Office from
earlier today, we spoke about trade.
Speaker 5 (17:29):
And we understand each other very well. I think we'll
have no problems.
Speaker 6 (17:33):
Do you think, I think, well, no problem whatsoever with Norway?
Speaker 5 (17:40):
Right, you can discuss visit the president. We didn't, but
I would.
Speaker 7 (17:45):
I love it.
Speaker 5 (17:45):
I mean, I've been there and it is a beautiful
place they have.
Speaker 8 (17:50):
So I told the President that, you know, he is
receiving us early in the term.
Speaker 5 (17:54):
He's welcome to me, said Norway, and we would like
to have him.
Speaker 8 (17:57):
And it will be another way of emphasizing the strong differentship.
Speaker 5 (18:04):
No one has been a staunch supporter of Ukraine.
Speaker 9 (18:07):
I've seen the Russian invasions within twenty two Has something.
Speaker 10 (18:12):
Being discussed here today that have may have altered you.
Speaker 6 (18:17):
On things no, we want to very simply, I have
no allegiance to anybody.
Speaker 5 (18:22):
I have allegiance to.
Speaker 6 (18:23):
Saving lives, and I want to save a lot of lives,
a lot of young people's mostly young people.
Speaker 5 (18:28):
It's the war, it's the soldiers, and if we can
do that.
Speaker 6 (18:32):
Also, as you know, I got started because the money
that's been spent on this war is insane. It should
have never happened, and it would have never happened if
I were president. But Biden spent three hundred and fifty
billion dollars on this and it's a shame.
Speaker 5 (18:49):
And that's what got me involved. And then I looked
at and I see the results. It's horrible.
Speaker 6 (18:55):
It's a killing field five thousand soldiers a week on average,
and we want to stop that. We both want to
stop that for a lot of reasons. But I would
say that is my number one reasons that.
Speaker 10 (19:12):
People get Russia to it to accept the deal, but
also Ukraine and Europe.
Speaker 5 (19:17):
Is I think Solia I do.
Speaker 6 (19:19):
I believe they will accept and I think we're going
to get this over with.
Speaker 5 (19:23):
I hope so soon.
Speaker 3 (19:28):
Continue to lack support from Nay two dollars and your
goal of obtaining greenland how will you proceed if you
don't get that support.
Speaker 6 (19:35):
Well, Greenland is going to be interesting with us for
another day. I think we need that for international peace,
and if you don't have that, I think it's a
big threat to our world. So I think Greenland is
very important for international piece.
Speaker 5 (19:48):
Yeah, please go ahead.
Speaker 9 (19:49):
For President, I should proposed use the words Vladimir's stop.
That seemed like a slightly different message of personal message.
What is your love frustration with President Putter?
Speaker 5 (20:01):
I didn't like last night.
Speaker 6 (20:03):
I wasn't happy with it, and we're in the midst
of talking peace and missiles were.
Speaker 5 (20:08):
Fired and I was not happy with it.
Speaker 6 (20:11):
That's what I meant, and that's you know what I.
Speaker 5 (20:16):
Assume that's what you mean. I keep falling.
Speaker 9 (20:20):
Will you consider additional sanctions toward Russia? Or what will
you do if President Putin?
Speaker 6 (20:25):
I'd rather answer that question in a week. I want
to see if we can have a deal. No reason
to answer it now, but I won't be happy. Let
me put it that way, things will happen. Pressure putting
a lot of pressure. You don't know what pressure I'm
putting on Russia.
Speaker 5 (20:42):
They're dealing. You have no idea what pressure I'm putting
in Russia.
Speaker 6 (20:45):
We're putting a lot of pressure. We're putting a lot
of pressure on Russia, and Russia was adding. Some people
that are close to it know or he wouldn't be
talking right now. The Prime Minister understands that better than anybody.
He wouldn't be talking right now. He's talking and we're
putting a lot of pressure. I think he wants to
make a deal. We're gonna find out very soon. But
it takes two to tango, so I think that they
(21:08):
both want piece right now.
Speaker 5 (21:09):
They're ready to do something. We'll see what happens.
Speaker 6 (21:12):
Complicated, very complicated, but I think they are both very
much looking to make a deal.
Speaker 5 (21:18):
Marko, what would you say, Well, first.
Speaker 11 (21:20):
Of all, what was put before our partners was options
to discuss about things that it would take to end
a war.
Speaker 7 (21:26):
This war is endable. Both sides just have to agree
to it.
Speaker 11 (21:29):
We've shown them a pathway forward. We've discussed those ideas.
There was a good meeting yesterday, There'll be good meetings
over the weekend.
Speaker 7 (21:34):
We've shown them the finish line. We need both of
them to say yes.
Speaker 11 (21:37):
But what happened last night with those missile strikes should
remind everybody of why this war needs to end. It's
horrible those missiles land that It's even worse is there
are today people that were alive yesterday that are not
alive today because this war continues and the President wants
to stop it.
Speaker 7 (21:50):
And everyone should be thanking the President for being a peacemaker.
Speaker 11 (21:52):
And trying to save lives. That's what we're trying to
do here. It's not our war. We didn't start it,
you know, but we're trying to end the dying. We're
trying to end the destruction, and we've shown the path forward.
Speaker 7 (22:04):
We can see the finish line. But both of them
have to get there.
Speaker 11 (22:06):
We're going to do everything we can to help them
get there, but they have to ultimately say yes.
Speaker 6 (22:09):
But we are using a lot of pressure on both
you know, if you think we're just in there because
we're nice people, and we are nice people, but we're
using a lot of pressure.
Speaker 5 (22:18):
What concessions to president in your national security team? What
concessions has.
Speaker 9 (22:23):
Russell offered up thus far to get to the point
where you're closer to peace.
Speaker 6 (22:28):
Stopping the war, stopping taking the whole country.
Speaker 5 (22:33):
Pretty big concession present if you are going to take
that tires. What do you want Norway to buy more
from the US to buy more?
Speaker 6 (22:48):
Well, you don't need snow, you don't need skis. You
don't need ski champions either, right, you.
Speaker 5 (22:53):
Have a lot of them. We just want to keep
the relationship the way it is we have.
Speaker 6 (22:59):
We've had a relationship I think now maybe closer than ever,
but we've had a great relationship with Norway.
Speaker 5 (23:05):
I think just keep it the way it is. Get
you can't do better.
Speaker 6 (23:11):
If they want to give us some additional concessions, that's
something you can't do much better.
Speaker 5 (23:15):
Yes, yes, Normay.
Speaker 7 (23:18):
Say you said that, do a lot of things right,
but aren't the Ukraine? If I can ask for you
than the Prime Minister, if.
Speaker 10 (23:25):
You find a common ground today on Ukraine and the
peace plan, totally it's totally common Granted the Prime Minister
can speak about it, but I can just say he
wants to see people.
Speaker 6 (23:36):
Stop dying more than anything else, and they'd like to
see it, and it's going to help us end it.
Speaker 8 (23:45):
I'm trying to say that to move towards an end
of this war, US engagement is critical and President Trump
made that possible.
Speaker 5 (23:54):
That is clear.
Speaker 8 (23:55):
That is all it's it's really happening now. The important
thing is that both parts just have to know that
they have to deliver, and they have to feel the
pressure to deliver.
Speaker 5 (24:06):
You deserve the peace for us? Do I deserveth.
Speaker 1 (24:11):
Well?
Speaker 6 (24:11):
Maybe for the Abraham Accords. I don't want to get
ahead of myself in this one. But they say for
the Abraham Accords. And by the way, speaking of that,
we're going to be filling it up. A lot of
countries want to come into the Abraham accuurdse. You know,
we have four and Biden did nothing on that one too,
and it's the same four. But they're great countries and
they were brave doing it, and it's worked out very well.
(24:33):
And we're going to be filling up the Abraham Accords.
They're going to be I think, filling it.
Speaker 5 (24:38):
Up marketing very rapidly. Could you say something about that.
Speaker 11 (24:42):
There's great enormous opportunity to grow the Abraham Accords.
Speaker 7 (24:45):
But I would just point to one thing.
Speaker 11 (24:47):
Of all the leaders in the world today, no leader
is working harder to prevent wars or in them. The
President trumpets right now, we're trying. That's why we're talking
to Iran. That's why we're engaged with Ukraine and Russia.
It's the desire to prevent these wars from breaking out
and the ones that exist already. And again, I just
think it's tremendous for our country to be led by
a president who desires to bring peace and establish peace
(25:08):
and protect piece.
Speaker 5 (25:09):
So it's hard work.
Speaker 6 (25:13):
You know, Marco just mentioned something that maybe we should
talk about for just a second, and we could miss
the Prime Minister. And you're involved in it too, because
you've been well involved in the world and peace. But
I think we're doing very well with respect to Iran,
and we're having very serious meetings.
Speaker 5 (25:33):
And there are only two options, and one option is
not a good option.
Speaker 6 (25:38):
It's not a not a good option at all.
Speaker 5 (25:42):
And I think we're doing very.
Speaker 6 (25:44):
Well on an agreement with RN but that one we're
doing a lot of things, I will say, but.
Speaker 5 (25:50):
That one is well.
Speaker 6 (25:52):
In this way, we could have a very very good
decision and a lot of lives will be saved Therein
the present money economy, there was a slow down as
it relates to home sales in the month of March.
Speaker 5 (26:06):
The slowest pace. It's two dollars and nine. Is that
an economic indicator, and perhaps the Treasury Secretary can weigh
in on this as well.
Speaker 4 (26:13):
Is that an economic indicator that can concerns you about
the broader US?
Speaker 6 (26:17):
Now, they had very good numbers on housing today, extremely
good numbers. And that's despite interest rates. Because you know,
if you look at what happened, everyone said, Oh, I said,
I was going to get prices down.
Speaker 5 (26:28):
I did.
Speaker 6 (26:29):
Energy just hit one dollar and ninety eight cents in
a couple of states.
Speaker 5 (26:33):
It's way down.
Speaker 6 (26:34):
Energy is down, and we're about sixty four dollars a
barrel when I came in and we were looking at
eighty nine ninety ninety five dollars.
Speaker 5 (26:41):
And by the way, that helps us solve the war too.
Speaker 6 (26:44):
Having those energy prices is a big, a big incentive
for Russia to also agree with solving the war problem.
Speaker 5 (26:52):
Groceries are down.
Speaker 6 (26:54):
When I was with you two months ago, you were
you were complaining about eggs. I said, I just got here.
I've been here for I was here for about a week.
When the press started saying about eggs have gone through
the roof. I said, I just got here. Tell me
about eggs. And they happened, They went through the roof,
and you couldn't get them. So we just had a
big Easter egg hunt at the White House, thousands and
(27:16):
thousands of eggs and the price was down eighty seven percent.
So we did a great job. Housing is doing very well.
We should lower interest rates, that's the FED. I hope
they lower interest rates. That's a smart thing to do.
Be ahead a little bit, although already it's a little
bit late. But in the end, we just have a
great country, a very strong country.
Speaker 5 (27:37):
And we have every other country.
Speaker 6 (27:39):
I can't think of one country that doesn't want to
negotiate a deal, and they either negotiate a deal or
we set a deal that we think is fair because
we don't have to go through all of these it
would be physically impossible.
Speaker 5 (27:53):
You know.
Speaker 6 (27:53):
You have so many people that really understand it, which
is a very small group of people here, and we
are going to at some point just set prices for deals.
Some will be tariffed, some treated us very unfairly. They'll
be tariffed higher than others. But we've been ripped off
for many, many years. The United States has been ripped
(28:14):
off like no country probably in the history of.
Speaker 5 (28:16):
The world, has been ripped off.
Speaker 6 (28:17):
For forty five fifty years, and countries have gotten rich.
Speaker 5 (28:22):
By doing that.
Speaker 6 (28:23):
With the United States, we've taken care of their militaries,
and military is another subject we talk about. We're not
going to make that subject to any of the deals.
But you know, you know the same countries that I do,
where we virtually take care of their military and then
they don't get treated fairly on trade. So the people,
and I don't blame those countries. I blame the people
that set at that beautiful desk right behind you, because
(28:46):
those people didn't do the job for this country, and
they let us lose four billion dollars a day on trade.
We were losing four or five billion dollars a day
on trade when I got here, and now we're going
to be much better than breaking even, and we're going
to be making four or five billion dollars a day
on trade. So but I don't blame any country. Not
(29:10):
the worst time, and we.
Speaker 5 (29:11):
Were abused by countries.
Speaker 6 (29:13):
I blamed the President of the United States that happened
to be sitting where these deals were made disgraceful.
Speaker 5 (29:20):
When I was here, we had a great four years.
We had the most successful.
Speaker 6 (29:23):
Economy in the history of our country. My first term,
and we were very tough on trade and with China.
As you know, they paid hundreds of billions of dollars
in tariffs, but nobody else ever did that. China paid
not ten cents to any other president and they but
not only China, virtually every country got away with murder.
Speaker 5 (29:44):
And we just can't let that happen. Thank you very much, everybody,
Thank you very much.
Speaker 2 (29:50):
All right, that was President Trump from the Oval Office.
Earlier today with they had of Norway and I spent
a lot of time talking about Ukraine. And that's been
the wrapplings up with today. We will be back tomorrow
all the news information that you will never get from
the state run legacy media mob. Don't forget Hannity nine
Eastern on Fox at you DVR. Have a great night.
(30:11):
We'll see you tonight. Back here tomorrow. Thank you for
making this show possible.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy And Charlamagne Tha God!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Decisions, Decisions
Welcome to "Decisions, Decisions," the podcast where boundaries are pushed, and conversations get candid! Join your favorite hosts, Mandii B and WeezyWTF, as they dive deep into the world of non-traditional relationships and explore the often-taboo topics surrounding dating, sex, and love. Every Monday, Mandii and Weezy invite you to unlearn the outdated narratives dictated by traditional patriarchal norms. With a blend of humor, vulnerability, and authenticity, they share their personal journeys navigating their 30s, tackling the complexities of modern relationships, and engaging in thought-provoking discussions that challenge societal expectations. From groundbreaking interviews with diverse guests to relatable stories that resonate with your experiences, "Decisions, Decisions" is your go-to source for open dialogue about what it truly means to love and connect in today's world. Get ready to reshape your understanding of relationships and embrace the freedom of authentic connections—tune in and join the conversation!