April 21, 2025 • 31 mins
Rep. Chip Roy, of Texas, joins to discuss today two major issues - one is the border and President Trump’s efforts to make this nation safe. The second is a reminder of just how hard the FBI and Christopher Wray worked to protect the Bidens and mislead the American people at every turn. With the SCOTUS ruling now blocking the American people from safety yet once again, we have to start to wonder, whose side is the Supreme Court on?
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, thanks Scott. On an hour two Sean Hannity's show,
Toll Free on numbers eight hundred and nine to four
one Seawan if you want to be a part of
the program announcing today the winner of our Tesla contest,
Verlin s who we have contacted from Westlake Village, California.
We'll keep you updated in terms of what the Tesla
vehicle of their choices when they finally make that decision.
(00:22):
So we'll get to that. I want to get back
to this issue of the Democrats now fighting amongst each other.
He had Senator Van Holland Maryland. Now, remember this is
a guy that never bothered to pick up a phone
and call Marylander, a real Marylander, Rachel Morin, when she
(00:44):
was brutally raped and murdered, and there was another woman
in Maryland similarly murdered and raped. Never picked up a phone,
called either one or either family. Never never bothered. Now
you have even designated trend de Aragua MS thirteen gang
members being deported from our country. They entered our country illegally,
(01:08):
as designated by judges, and they're putting the rights of
illegal immigrants over the safety of American citizens. How many
Americans have been murdered and raped and victims of other
violent crimes. How many Americans are dying because of Biden
and Harris and their open borders and all the fentanyl
and all the opioids across that border. And this is
(01:30):
now the petulant Party. They won't even stand for moms
that lost their children at a joint Session of Congress speech.
They won't stand for a young man who defeated cancer.
They won't stand for the wife of a slain officer,
a hero that's from Long Island, New York. They won't
stand for a young man who lost his father and
got a commission a West Point. They just stand there
(01:52):
with their bingo paddles. And I guess now they've got
a second in charge at the DNC that is saying, well,
if you're not part of this revolution of radicalism, there's
really no place in the Democratic Party for you.
Speaker 2 (02:08):
Now.
Speaker 1 (02:08):
It was pretty interesting to watch Van Holland. He was
asked twice this weekend if this guy Garcia is a
member of MS thirteen, as had been designated by two
separate judges. Listen.
Speaker 3 (02:21):
In twenty nineteen, police alleged a confidential informant claimed that
Abrego Garcia was an active MS thirteen member. His wife
and his attorney deny that. Of course, can you say
with absolute certainty that he is not, nor has he
ever been a member of the MS thirteen gang. And
did you ask him point blank?
Speaker 4 (02:41):
Well, Dana, what Donald Trump is trying to do here
is change the subject. The subject at hand is that
he and his administration are defined a court order to
people to give up Brego Garcia his due process rights.
They are trying to litigate on social media what they
should be doing in the courts. They need to put
(03:03):
up or shut up in the courts.
Speaker 5 (03:05):
But since you were the one person to have met
with him, and since this is a thing you say
on social media, it's what we hear from Donald Trump
and Republicans every day, all day long, you didn't ask him.
Speaker 4 (03:17):
I didn't ask him that because I know what his
answer is. What he told me was he was sad
and traumatized that he was being in prison because he
has committed no crimes. And that goes to the heart
of this issue, because he's been denied his due process rights.
Speaker 1 (03:34):
All right, So there you hear von Holland he doesn't
answer the question, and that is whether Abrego Garcia is
a member of MS thirteen. Then on the other hand,
he wants to give himself a little out. Oh, I'm
not vouching for Brego Garcia, the man. I'm vouching for
his rights. Well, he's already been before two judges. Listen.
Speaker 6 (03:52):
Do you worry though, that you were sticking your neck
out for somebody who, maybe down the line, is proven
to be connected to MS thirteen.
Speaker 4 (03:58):
I want to be very clear vouching for the man.
I'm vouching for the man's rights, his constitutional rights to
do process, and the proper place to litigate that is
in the courts. In the most recent federal district court
judge that looked at this, judge Zennis said that the
administration had presented no evidence of his connection to MS thirteen, or,
(04:20):
by the way, to any other criminal, gang or terrorist activities.
Speaker 6 (04:23):
Just quickly, then if he is brought back, if the
administration finally says, okay, we got a duty, let's get
him back here and he's given due process, then to
deport it again, you're okay with that process.
Speaker 4 (04:32):
I support the rule of law. That's exactly my point here.
And if you threaten the rule of law for one person,
you've threaten it for everybody.
Speaker 1 (04:41):
In America, fascinating people from his state of Maryland. Rachel
morn raped and murdered. He never called us their family,
never stood up for their rights? Or are Kylie Hamilton
raped and murdered his state of Maryland? Never never picked
up a phone and called their families? Anyway? Here with
us is Congressman Ship Roy of Texas. Sir, welcome back
(05:03):
to the program. What do you make of this show?
And this basically the entire Democratic Establishment Party and the
Radical Party is now championing the rights of this guy
designated by two separate judges an MS thirteen gang member.
Speaker 7 (05:20):
Yeah, Sean, good to be on And I think what
you're seeing in full display here. I mean, look, I
can't overstate the seriousness of what we're dealing with here.
I think it's important to level set for your listeners
and for everybody in this country. We have a job
to do to make sure everybody knows this. What we've
seen out of the Democrats over the last four to
five years is an active effort to specifically put millions
(05:44):
of people from around the world into the United States
in violation of our law to abuse our laws, to
abuse procedures we put in place out of the goodness
of our hearts for asylum for very specific cases, and
in doing so, they have dumped very dangerous individuals into
our country. Whether it's Trenda and Agua, whether it's MS thirteen,
whether it's other organizations. They've resulted in the depth of Americans.
(06:06):
You've talked about it on your show relentlessly. We've had
people like Joscelyn Nungray who has murdered her mom, Alexis Nungray.
It's a good friend of mine in Texas. You point
out the Marylanders that we're talking about here, Kayla Hamilton,
Rachel Morin. So where was this good senator from Maryland
in those instances? Nowhere to be found because they don't
care about that. What they care about is flooding the
(06:26):
zone of our country with people to reshape and remake America.
That's what it's all about. It's purposeful. They want that,
they want our country to be changed that way, and
they don't care if we're endangered in the process. So
what we're seeing right now the President being willing to
challenge that and to be very clear about the law.
There's a lot of words that due process getting thrown around.
(06:49):
We're not talking about due process here where you're talking
about whether someone's being convicted of a crime and being
afforded due process for say, murder in the United States,
because they're getting to process for that. And by the way,
this individual got quote due process on the questions of
whether or not he was here illegally, he had proceedings.
The courts issued an order of removal. There's a simple
(07:11):
question that they had offered that, oh, well, he might
be in danger if he goes back to El Salvador.
But as Stephen Miller has pointed out, all that means
is you can't that. If that question exists, maybe you
can't go back to El Salvador. You go somewhere else.
The point here is they don't want people to be removed.
That's it. Democrats don't. Van Holland doesn't. They don't care
about what's happening Americans, And the fact here is the
(07:33):
president does. That's what's at stake here. Don't get lost
in this nonsense of quote due process, because that's not
what's happening here. What's happening here are Democrats trying to
avert the system that's why they're opposing the Save Act.
By the way, they want illegals to vote, they want
non citizens to vote, has nothing to do with all
the craft they're throwing at the Save back to preserve
(07:55):
our elections. That's what's happening.
Speaker 8 (07:57):
Right now, Sean.
Speaker 1 (07:58):
We've had four different and presidents prior to Trump now
that have used the Alien Enemies Act, and we even
had a nineteen forty eight Supreme Court decision on this
that said that it was once the president makes that
decision and that power and determination is solely in his hands.
(08:19):
And by the way, we're talking about MS thirteen, it
is a designated terrorist organization that there is absolutely no
judicial review as such. Why didn't the Supreme Court stand
by the Alien Enemies Act that was already upheld by
the Supreme Court. We always ask nominees to the Supreme Court,
(08:39):
if they're withhold present, if they will hold the precedent,
and apparently there are too many people on that court
that were unwilling to do so.
Speaker 8 (08:47):
Well.
Speaker 7 (08:47):
Obviously, I very much agree with the dissents by the
solid conservative justices and our friends Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito,
one of my side note, Sean, one of the proudest
things I've ever done is as a lawyer on the
Senate Judiciary Committee, ensure that we got Sam Alito on
the United States Supreme Court in two thousand and five.
That's the whole story in and of itself. But Robert
(09:09):
but Thomas and Alito they get this right. I think
the Supreme Court and It's and it's ruling, I think
they get it wrong. And they've created a situation now
where they're where they're endangering our ability as the commander
achieved to be able to execute his function, to be
able to defend our country. And that's what's at stake here.
Speaker 2 (09:29):
I've got a lot of.
Speaker 7 (09:30):
Smart lawyer friends that are kind of getting, in my opinion,
wrapped around the axle on this. You got to take
a step back and go look, as I said before,
the previous administration violated our laws to dump people into
the United States on a range of very dangerous to
maybe not dangerous, but millions of people, many of whom
are dangerous and shouldn't be here. And now you've got
(09:52):
a president trying to fix that. And now suddenly we're
going to have to We're gonna have the Supreme Court
step in and say, oh no, sorry, you you can't
do this. You can't remove because we've got to ford
them all of this mountains of process when it is
very clear there is a limit, there is a limit
to the kind of new process we're talking about on
the determinations that the Executive Branch is making on foreign
(10:17):
nationals being present in our country under parole and asylum laws.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
Rememberable by the way, and for the record, I mean,
he's not even disputing or it's not in dispute the
issue of whether or not he's in the country illegally,
which should be game over to begin with, all right, quickbreak,
will come right back. We'll continue more with Congressman Chip
Roy at Texas on the other side than your calls
coming up orright, we continue now with Texas Congressman Hip Roy.
(10:41):
We'll get to your calls at the bottom of the
half hour eight hundred and ninety four one Shawn straight ahead.
Alito wrote a pretty fiery descent, saying that the court
issued what the court issue is unprecedented legally questionable relief
without giving the lower courts a chance to rule, without
hearing from the opposing party. Within eight hours of receiving
the application would do be his factual support for its
(11:04):
order without providing any explanation for their order, and went
on to say, I refused to join the Court's order
because we had no good reason to think, under the circumstances,
issuing an order at midnight was necessary or appropriate. He
went on to say, and I don't think he was
wrong in his rebuke.
Speaker 7 (11:24):
He was not wrong in his rebuke. And I think
that's I think the story here, and I think is
what we'll see unfold. But there is a dividing line
right in the quote conservative or Republican appointed block of
the Court. And you saw that unfold here. And look,
and we saw it last week in that five to
four ruling that went our way, but you saw that
(11:44):
Amy Cony Barrett went the other way in the four Like,
there's a dividing line here, and I think Thomas and
Alito are getting it right. But again, I want to
and I don't mean to dwell on it, but I
want everybody to take away what we're dealing with at
this moment in history. And I say, like, you know, Sean,
like I'm very much a believer we need that ballance
(12:06):
of powers. Congress needs to assert itself. Youve got to
respect the court's role. But here we've got the commander
in chief who's at his maximum in the authority that
he has under the Constitution to defend our country, to
ensure safety. And we're not talking about American citizens here,
and we're not talking about taking somebody and convicting them
(12:27):
under for a crime without due process. We're talking about
a president who removed an individual who had a court
order to remove him to a foreign country, take him
and send it back to his foreign country, his home,
and say that's where you're going to go. And now
you've got court saying, well, I don't know if we
can do that, or that we've got these Oh you
(12:48):
can't do this for some broad class of people. Well,
where was the court when Joe Biden was abusing our
law by declaring a class of people could be parolled
into the United States with an app jumping literally millions
of people, including murderers of Joscelyn nungraat Sean. I'm not
going to put up with it and not allow them
to twist this all around.
Speaker 1 (13:09):
And I get let me ask you this, because let's
go back, because this is the new radicalized democratic party. Well,
let's go back and play Hillary Clinton on the issue
of deporting illegal immigrant criminals.
Speaker 9 (13:23):
I think we got to have tough conditions. Tell people
to come out of the shadows. If they've committed a crime,
deport them, no questions asked, They're gone. If they've been
working and are law abiding, we should say, here are
the conditions for you staying. You have to pay a
stiff fine because you came here illegally. You have to
pay back taxes, and you have to try to learn English,
(13:45):
and you have to.
Speaker 8 (13:46):
Wait in line.
Speaker 1 (13:49):
What happened to that party?
Speaker 7 (13:51):
Well, I would note that there is a lot of
those examples. You point. That clip from Hillary is a
good one. I'm in Austin, Texas. Barbara Jordan, a renowned Democrat.
He was on one of the committees talking about our
need to secure the border. Of Chuck Schumer. You can
go find dozens of quotes about what we need to
do to secure the border. Again, this has all now
been politicized, and again they're doing it at the time,
(14:12):
and Senator Van Holliday is like the poster chob right
now and now we've got others. I'm told that speaker,
I mean, I'm sorry, Democrat majority leader Jeffares is going
to be heading down Tel Salvador. They are doubling down, Okay,
they are doubling down and believing that they should be
backing individuals who are affiliated with dangerous criminal organizations that
(14:34):
are pumping fedol and drugs in our communities, pumping dangerous
actors in our communities. And that's the current modern Democratic
Party now seany you know, there's forty seven people that
were arrested near Austin, Texas about ten days ago. If
you saw that story, forty seven trend dan Agua people.
I guess twenty five were affiliated with TDA, and then
there was others that happened about a mile from my house, okay,
(14:58):
in southwest of Austin, Texas. This is real, and it
is pervasive, and it is a direct consequence of Democrats
who do not care about the rule of law. Don't
let them hide. That is not directed to you, but
for everybody listening. Don't let democrats pretend that they're for
the rule of law here. They're not.
Speaker 1 (15:14):
Well, they're not in any way. Well, we're going to
continue to follow it, I mean, but yeah, Texas has
been on the front lines of a lot of this,
and you know, but for people like you and and
Ted Cruz and Governor Abbott, you know, Texas would be
in a lot worse shape. And Governor Abbit Governor DeSantis
is sending illegals to sanctuary cities and states and areas.
(15:36):
I think was a stroke of genius on their part. Anyway,
we appreciate your time, Chip Royd. Thank you. Eight hundred
and nine four one Shawn is a number if you
want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 3 (15:51):
The one thing you can always count on.
Speaker 1 (15:55):
Sean Hannity is back on the radio right twenty five
until the top of the hour. Eight hundred and nine
to four one Shawn is our number if you want
to be a part of the program. Uh now, congratulations again.
The winner of our tesla contest is Verlin s from
Westlake Village in California. And my understanding is this individual
(16:17):
has been gotten in touch with and we'll pick the
tesla of their choice. Where I want to thank you,
say thank you to everyone for participating and h you know,
maybe we'll do other contests in the future. I haven't
thought about it too much yet, but so far, but
I will look. Israel still under attack, you see what's
going on in the Middle East. The world's going to
have to make a decision soon on Iran. They should
(16:41):
be forced by the world to dismantle the nuclear program.
They we must insist on anywhere, any place, anytime, inspections.
I don't think they're going to go along with either
one of those things, and that will basically leave the
world with two choices. Do nothing and allow the mulls
in a ram with their radicalism to have nuclear weapons,
(17:03):
or choice number two is the world's got to see
the importance that that radicalism could lead to a modern
day holocaust, and it's a risk that we can't take.
I know other people have different views. I have no
interest in starting a conflict or war if they'd be
willing to dismantle their weapons program programs knowing that what
(17:25):
the inevitable response is going to be though would be
probably be ideal. Does it increase the risk, Yeah, it
does to countries in the region, et cetera. But I
think we've got to prepare for worst case scenario. But
in the meantime, Israel still under attack and their missile
fire is resumed, you have tens and tens of thousands
(17:46):
of displaced people and these terrorists are just committed to
wiping Israel off the map, and we've seen nothing but
death and destruction. And we hope you'll join all of
us here on Team Hannity in this show and help
the people of Israe as they fight for the very survival.
One of the best ways to do that is to
partner with us and the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews.
(18:08):
Whatever gift you can give today is going to help
provide security essentials like bomb shelters, flack jackets, full of
proof vests, armored security vehicles, ambulances, humanitarian assistants of every kind. Anyway,
there's no better time right now with the Passover Easter
season in freshen our memories as we celebrate Israel's historic
(18:30):
deliverance and birth of a nation. Now, there's two ways
you can donate. You can call eight eight eight four
eight eight IFCJ eight eight eight four eight eight, IFCJ online.
They have a website. It's one word support, IFCJ dot org.
That's SUPPORTIFCJ dot org two day. All right, let's get
to our busy phones. Let us say hi to David
(18:52):
in San Diego Coco Radio. What's up, David, How are
you glad you called sir?
Speaker 8 (18:58):
Hi? Sean, thanks a long time listener, first time call her.
A little bit nervous here, but outdo lett.
Speaker 1 (19:04):
Now you're talking to friends. Let not your heartbeat trouble.
Do you sound great? What's going on?
Speaker 2 (19:08):
Thank you?
Speaker 8 (19:08):
Sean. Yes, I'm a retired immigration officer, did thirty plus
years combined I N S and CBP, and I just
wanted to sound off a little bit on this Van
Holland situation. I was watching it last week and I
was like, okay, I can't I can't stay quiet Moore.
I got to try to call Sean here, and the
reason is sound. He starts off by saying I'm going
to go down there and I'm going to bring him back,
(19:29):
and I'm like, no, you're not okay. I taught immigration
law for several years and the only possible way for
him to come back would be if the Trump administration
authorized a parole, they bring him back, which of course
not all hinges on whether or not El Salvador wants
to release him, which doesn't look like they want to.
But even if they did, he comes back. He doesn't
(19:49):
just get off the plane and say hi, everybody, I'm
back and go back to you know, picnicking and stuff
like that. No, he goes into detention with ice, he
awaits this hearing that they say they want him to
have hearing, and he gets sort of removed again. So
it's all kind of pointless. And the only thing in contention,
it's not that he's a gang member or a criminal
or whatnot. That judge agreed with that. All the judge
(20:11):
said was, yes you're a gang member. Yes you're removable.
However you fear going back to your home country due
to gang affiliations or whatnot. So that's the only issue
at hand. But that's even ridiculous because asylum political protection
only relates to race, religion, nationality, membership, and a social
group or political opinion. I don't think being in a
(20:32):
gang qualifies you for that.
Speaker 1 (20:33):
Listen again, I go to Democrats want to die on
this hill. And you know, when Van Holland was asked
this weekend point blank if this guy's a member of
MS thirteen, he won't answer that question. And there are
some Democrats, not many of them, warning their own party
against making a martyr out of this guy. And this trip,
(20:56):
by the way, it was an interesting Logan Act analysis.
I think it was on foxnews dot com where this
trip might violate laws that liberals used as a pretext
for Michael Flynn in the probe against him. I wonder
if that'll happen there. But you know, if this is
the hill they want to die on standing up for,
you know, somebody that two courts have identified as an
(21:19):
MS thirteen gang member, then then let them be that party.
You know, there was an interview David Hogg was on
with our friend Ryan's previous and he just said, you know,
and by the way, this guy is now championing, as
we discussed earlier, you know that the Democratic Party needs
to primary anybody that's not hardcore radical left. And he's saying, well,
(21:44):
these Democrats are asleep at the wheel. They're not AOC,
they're not Jasmine Crockett. And it doesn't get any worse
than if you're defending Harvard and the PROHOMAUS wing that
is there, and you're traveling to Al Salvador to defend
MS gang MS team gang members. It really doesn't get
worse than that. And you're championing the right of men
(22:05):
to play women's sports. That is the Democratic Party today.
So if this is the path that they have chosen,
I just say, just let them.
Speaker 10 (22:13):
Let them.
Speaker 1 (22:14):
When somebody's self destructing, don't get in the way. That's
kind of a rule. Anyway, David, you didn't sound nervous
at all. You did great. We appreciate the call. Jim
in the Free State of Florida. What's up, Jim? How
are you, sir?
Speaker 2 (22:26):
Hey Sean, how are you doing today?
Speaker 1 (22:27):
I'm good man, what's going on?
Speaker 8 (22:29):
Hey?
Speaker 10 (22:29):
Was watching your show a few nights a day, like
I do every night, and wanted to tell you how
awesome and great job you did with Taylor Relyins Lorenz
excuse me?
Speaker 1 (22:41):
Former New York Times Dailyb's Washington Post US. Yeah.
Speaker 10 (22:45):
Liberal, Yeah, I looked her up and she's just as
cooo coo as a shooter is I got so working?
Speaker 1 (22:52):
Well, I wouldn't say that. I mean, she's not out
shooting people. However, this glorification again of Luigi Mangioni, and
this glorification of Hamas and this this you know, dying
on the hill of defending the rights that don't exist
for illegal immigrants that have gang associations. That that's your
(23:13):
modern liberal, left wing, radicalized party. And she just represents
it well. I noticed she wouldn't answer my question though, and.
Speaker 8 (23:21):
That's what got me worked.
Speaker 10 (23:22):
If I got some worked up, I my beer my
TV and spilled my beer and broke my TV.
Speaker 1 (23:26):
It was you spilled you a bit. Well, that's not
good about it. If I'm causing you to spill your
beer and break your TV, that's not good.
Speaker 7 (23:33):
It wasn't you, it was her.
Speaker 1 (23:36):
That's funny.
Speaker 10 (23:37):
It's saddening that in the United States of America that
there's people that are okay with someone being shot.
Speaker 7 (23:43):
Down in cold blood.
Speaker 10 (23:44):
It's not good.
Speaker 1 (23:45):
Listen. The fact that they are idolizing this assassination culture
and their silence is deafening. Praising a guy that you know,
killed the United accused of killing the United Healthcare CEO,
and cold blood. The people that are praising a terrorist
organization Hamas the people that remain silent as Tesla dealerships
(24:07):
are being shot at and vehicles set ablaze and charging
station set ablaze and calls for assassination. There was another
call for an assassination of Donald Trump over the weekend.
You know, if this is the culture of the left,
I mean, I don't know what to say. I mean,
do you have the George Mason PhD student asking when
(24:30):
must we kill Trump and his administration? When must we
kill them? You know, never in my life with political
disagreements have I ever thought of political violence. Now it's
kind of institutionalized. And then you have the fear factor,
and that is prominent Democrats won't even criticize their own
They're afraid to take a stand against something that basic,
(24:51):
fundamental and simple, and I think that just reflects the
dire state that they're in today. Anyway, Jim, don't spill
your beer, man, and don't break the I need you
to watch that every night. We have a great show
tonight at night. That's our busy phones eight hundred and
nine to four one, Shawn our number if you want
to be a part of the program. Chris and Michigan. Chris,
how are you glad you called?
Speaker 10 (25:11):
Right?
Speaker 2 (25:11):
I am great, Sean, It's an honor to talk to you. Sarah. Hey, Sean.
The other day you had a person on and they
mentioned the greade one Rush Limbaugh, and I got thinking,
I wonder what Sean would think that Rush would be
thinking now if Rush was still with us, what would
he be thinking about all the work that President Trump
is doing and actually making a real difference in this country.
Speaker 1 (25:35):
I think this would be a culmination of his life's work,
if you really want to know the truth, I mean,
what did Rush champion. He championed liberty and freedom and constitutionalism.
He championed limited government, greater freedom, dismantling of this this
massive bureaucracy that is built up, you know, under uniparty
(25:57):
rule for decades. He would love the conoclastic approach of
Donald Trump. He would mock and make fun of and
point out the hypocrisy of the left and they're embracing
violent culture and them melting down and losing. You know,
we've always known the left has been this way. They
at least try to create an appearance of normalcy, even
(26:19):
though we knew it didn't exist. They hid their radicalism
even though we all knew it existed. And I think
he would see this the way we're all seeing it,
as a very very heavy lift to fix things and
return to constitutional order, to make this the most consequential
presidency in one hundred, one hundred and fifty years. There's
not one thing Donald Trump is now tackling that's not
(26:41):
heavy and hard, and it's a heavy lift all the
way across the board, and I think he'd be there
every day, you know, championing the success. And I know
that the you know, if we do this right, America
will be richer, more prosperous, more free than as ever
been in our lifetime. And as Reagan admonished us, freedom
(27:04):
is but one generation away from extinction. I think he
would also be all about the idea of preserving it
for future generations. We now run the risk of being
the first generation that hands off our country in far
worse shape than we inherited it. And so I think
everything from national security and defense, the next generation of weaponry,
(27:25):
securing our borders and deporting illegal immigrant criminals. I think
getting rid of woke every place everywhere. I think doze
in eliminating waste, fraud and abuse. I think energy dominance.
I think America's role in the world. We don't have
to be the world's policeman. However, America does have a
(27:45):
role advancing the cause of liberty and freedom. And it's
often a needle you have to thread. But his voice
is dearly missed. But this was his life's work. He
championed the freedom. And when you you limit the size
of government. You are emboldening and enabling the American people
to live free versus, for example, the Green New Deal,
(28:09):
which is guaranteed womb to the tomb, cradle to the grave.
You know, promises that will always fail, They'll be unfulfilled promises.
You end up the same way. No matter what name,
whatever what manifestation it comes in, the guarantees will be there,
They'll never materialize, just like our educational system has failed.
(28:31):
Law and order has failed too many people in this country.
Obamacare has failed too many people in this country. Social
Security medicares headed towards insolvency in this country because government
never fulfills their promises. And then you end up in
the end you have unfulfilled promises and more poverty. And
(28:51):
then you have to calculate how much freedom you gave
up in the name of false security. And that's fundamentally
you know, the crossroads America is at right now, and
it will America choose freedom? Will America have the stomach
to stick with Trump? And we will Trump voters have
the stomach to stick with him, you know, to to
push to to break this stranglehold that the the bureaucratic,
(29:17):
institutionalists and establishment types have have so desperately been clinging
onto like manna from heaven, and a lot of Republicans
I haven't having problems with it as well, because they
too have been institutionalized this This is our opportunity to
fundamentally restructure government into the original intent and purpose of
(29:39):
our framers and founders.
Speaker 2 (29:40):
In my view, well, you know, Sean, I appreciate everything
that you do, but I gotta be ho there's times
I really missed the Golden IV and the wis Mike
that came from listen.
Speaker 1 (29:52):
I'm part of our club, you know. I said at
the time when Rush passed that nobody, nobody can replace
Babe Ruth. You just can't. And I think Rush would
want all of us to raise our game, do our part,
do a little more, and knowing that he gave us
a very good educational foundation for this battle, this fight
(30:13):
and frankly the moment we're now living in, because this
moment is critical. We're at a crossroads for the country
and I think I think we have the opportunity of
a lifetime. I really do. I've never been more optimistic
that America has the opportunity to write this ship and
return to America to its. It's founding ideals and principles
(30:35):
that we know work. Freedom works, belief in the individual works.
And you know, it's just it's just enacting those policies.
Anytime we've ever enacted the policies of liberty and freedom.
I don't care if it's Reagan, I don't care if
it's Trump. They always work. Anyway. I hope that answers
your question. But yes, we miss him dearly, and you know,
(30:58):
and we're also I'll find myself thankful that you know,
we had him as a foundation. Just on a personal note,
I mean, he paved the way for all of us
in new media, all of us. And you know, he
came on the scene there were two hundred plus news
talk stations around the country. Now it's the number one
format in radio. You know, we're now we're on seven
(31:18):
hundred and fifty radio stations. He made it easier for
those of us to follow, and that includes podcasters, that
includes social media, that includes you know, other outlets and
other means of communication. So that you know, that's why
the legacy state run legacy media mob is dead in
my view. Anyway, appreciate you call my friend. We'll always
miss him. He's in our hearts, and I know he's
(31:40):
looking down on us and hoping we get this right.
All right, thanks Scott. On an hour two Sean Hannity's show,
Toll Free on numbers eight hundred and nine to four
one Seawan if you want to be a part of
the program announcing today the winner of our Tesla contest,
Verlin s who we have contacted from Westlake Village, California.
We'll keep you updated in terms of what the Tesla
vehicle of their choices when they finally make that decision.
(00:22):
So we'll get to that. I want to get back
to this issue of the Democrats now fighting amongst each other.
He had Senator Van Holland Maryland. Now, remember this is
a guy that never bothered to pick up a phone
and call Marylander, a real Marylander, Rachel Morin, when she
(00:44):
was brutally raped and murdered, and there was another woman
in Maryland similarly murdered and raped. Never picked up a phone,
called either one or either family. Never never bothered. Now
you have even designated trend de Aragua MS thirteen gang
members being deported from our country. They entered our country illegally,
(01:08):
as designated by judges, and they're putting the rights of
illegal immigrants over the safety of American citizens. How many
Americans have been murdered and raped and victims of other
violent crimes. How many Americans are dying because of Biden
and Harris and their open borders and all the fentanyl
and all the opioids across that border. And this is
(01:30):
now the petulant Party. They won't even stand for moms
that lost their children at a joint Session of Congress speech.
They won't stand for a young man who defeated cancer.
They won't stand for the wife of a slain officer,
a hero that's from Long Island, New York. They won't
stand for a young man who lost his father and
got a commission a West Point. They just stand there
(01:52):
with their bingo paddles. And I guess now they've got
a second in charge at the DNC that is saying, well,
if you're not part of this revolution of radicalism, there's
really no place in the Democratic Party for you.
Speaker 2 (02:08):
Now.
Speaker 1 (02:08):
It was pretty interesting to watch Van Holland. He was
asked twice this weekend if this guy Garcia is a
member of MS thirteen, as had been designated by two
separate judges. Listen.
Speaker 3 (02:21):
In twenty nineteen, police alleged a confidential informant claimed that
Abrego Garcia was an active MS thirteen member. His wife
and his attorney deny that. Of course, can you say
with absolute certainty that he is not, nor has he
ever been a member of the MS thirteen gang. And
did you ask him point blank?
Speaker 4 (02:41):
Well, Dana, what Donald Trump is trying to do here
is change the subject. The subject at hand is that
he and his administration are defined a court order to
people to give up Brego Garcia his due process rights.
They are trying to litigate on social media what they
should be doing in the courts. They need to put
(03:03):
up or shut up in the courts.
Speaker 5 (03:05):
But since you were the one person to have met
with him, and since this is a thing you say
on social media, it's what we hear from Donald Trump
and Republicans every day, all day long, you didn't ask him.
Speaker 4 (03:17):
I didn't ask him that because I know what his
answer is. What he told me was he was sad
and traumatized that he was being in prison because he
has committed no crimes. And that goes to the heart
of this issue, because he's been denied his due process rights.
Speaker 1 (03:34):
All right, So there you hear von Holland he doesn't
answer the question, and that is whether Abrego Garcia is
a member of MS thirteen. Then on the other hand,
he wants to give himself a little out. Oh, I'm
not vouching for Brego Garcia, the man. I'm vouching for
his rights. Well, he's already been before two judges. Listen.
Speaker 6 (03:52):
Do you worry though, that you were sticking your neck
out for somebody who, maybe down the line, is proven
to be connected to MS thirteen.
Speaker 4 (03:58):
I want to be very clear vouching for the man.
I'm vouching for the man's rights, his constitutional rights to
do process, and the proper place to litigate that is
in the courts. In the most recent federal district court
judge that looked at this, judge Zennis said that the
administration had presented no evidence of his connection to MS thirteen, or,
(04:20):
by the way, to any other criminal, gang or terrorist activities.
Speaker 6 (04:23):
Just quickly, then if he is brought back, if the
administration finally says, okay, we got a duty, let's get
him back here and he's given due process, then to
deport it again, you're okay with that process.
Speaker 4 (04:32):
I support the rule of law. That's exactly my point here.
And if you threaten the rule of law for one person,
you've threaten it for everybody.
Speaker 1 (04:41):
In America, fascinating people from his state of Maryland. Rachel
morn raped and murdered. He never called us their family,
never stood up for their rights? Or are Kylie Hamilton
raped and murdered his state of Maryland? Never never picked
up a phone and called their families? Anyway? Here with
us is Congressman Ship Roy of Texas. Sir, welcome back
(05:03):
to the program. What do you make of this show?
And this basically the entire Democratic Establishment Party and the
Radical Party is now championing the rights of this guy
designated by two separate judges an MS thirteen gang member.
Speaker 7 (05:20):
Yeah, Sean, good to be on And I think what
you're seeing in full display here. I mean, look, I
can't overstate the seriousness of what we're dealing with here.
I think it's important to level set for your listeners
and for everybody in this country. We have a job
to do to make sure everybody knows this. What we've
seen out of the Democrats over the last four to
five years is an active effort to specifically put millions
(05:44):
of people from around the world into the United States
in violation of our law to abuse our laws, to
abuse procedures we put in place out of the goodness
of our hearts for asylum for very specific cases, and
in doing so, they have dumped very dangerous individuals into
our country. Whether it's Trenda and Agua, whether it's MS thirteen,
whether it's other organizations. They've resulted in the depth of Americans.
(06:06):
You've talked about it on your show relentlessly. We've had
people like Joscelyn Nungray who has murdered her mom, Alexis Nungray.
It's a good friend of mine in Texas. You point
out the Marylanders that we're talking about here, Kayla Hamilton,
Rachel Morin. So where was this good senator from Maryland
in those instances? Nowhere to be found because they don't
care about that. What they care about is flooding the
(06:26):
zone of our country with people to reshape and remake America.
That's what it's all about. It's purposeful. They want that,
they want our country to be changed that way, and
they don't care if we're endangered in the process. So
what we're seeing right now the President being willing to
challenge that and to be very clear about the law.
There's a lot of words that due process getting thrown around.
(06:49):
We're not talking about due process here where you're talking
about whether someone's being convicted of a crime and being
afforded due process for say, murder in the United States,
because they're getting to process for that. And by the way,
this individual got quote due process on the questions of
whether or not he was here illegally, he had proceedings.
The courts issued an order of removal. There's a simple
(07:11):
question that they had offered that, oh, well, he might
be in danger if he goes back to El Salvador.
But as Stephen Miller has pointed out, all that means
is you can't that. If that question exists, maybe you
can't go back to El Salvador. You go somewhere else.
The point here is they don't want people to be removed.
That's it. Democrats don't. Van Holland doesn't. They don't care
about what's happening Americans, And the fact here is the
(07:33):
president does. That's what's at stake here. Don't get lost
in this nonsense of quote due process, because that's not
what's happening here. What's happening here are Democrats trying to
avert the system that's why they're opposing the Save Act.
By the way, they want illegals to vote, they want
non citizens to vote, has nothing to do with all
the craft they're throwing at the Save back to preserve
(07:55):
our elections. That's what's happening.
Speaker 8 (07:57):
Right now, Sean.
Speaker 1 (07:58):
We've had four different and presidents prior to Trump now
that have used the Alien Enemies Act, and we even
had a nineteen forty eight Supreme Court decision on this
that said that it was once the president makes that
decision and that power and determination is solely in his hands.
(08:19):
And by the way, we're talking about MS thirteen, it
is a designated terrorist organization that there is absolutely no
judicial review as such. Why didn't the Supreme Court stand
by the Alien Enemies Act that was already upheld by
the Supreme Court. We always ask nominees to the Supreme Court,
(08:39):
if they're withhold present, if they will hold the precedent,
and apparently there are too many people on that court
that were unwilling to do so.
Speaker 8 (08:47):
Well.
Speaker 7 (08:47):
Obviously, I very much agree with the dissents by the
solid conservative justices and our friends Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito,
one of my side note, Sean, one of the proudest
things I've ever done is as a lawyer on the
Senate Judiciary Committee, ensure that we got Sam Alito on
the United States Supreme Court in two thousand and five.
That's the whole story in and of itself. But Robert
(09:09):
but Thomas and Alito they get this right. I think
the Supreme Court and It's and it's ruling, I think
they get it wrong. And they've created a situation now
where they're where they're endangering our ability as the commander
achieved to be able to execute his function, to be
able to defend our country. And that's what's at stake here.
Speaker 2 (09:29):
I've got a lot of.
Speaker 7 (09:30):
Smart lawyer friends that are kind of getting, in my opinion,
wrapped around the axle on this. You got to take
a step back and go look, as I said before,
the previous administration violated our laws to dump people into
the United States on a range of very dangerous to
maybe not dangerous, but millions of people, many of whom
are dangerous and shouldn't be here. And now you've got
(09:52):
a president trying to fix that. And now suddenly we're
going to have to We're gonna have the Supreme Court
step in and say, oh no, sorry, you you can't
do this. You can't remove because we've got to ford
them all of this mountains of process when it is
very clear there is a limit, there is a limit
to the kind of new process we're talking about on
the determinations that the Executive Branch is making on foreign
(10:17):
nationals being present in our country under parole and asylum laws.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
Rememberable by the way, and for the record, I mean,
he's not even disputing or it's not in dispute the
issue of whether or not he's in the country illegally,
which should be game over to begin with, all right, quickbreak,
will come right back. We'll continue more with Congressman Chip
Roy at Texas on the other side than your calls
coming up orright, we continue now with Texas Congressman Hip Roy.
(10:41):
We'll get to your calls at the bottom of the
half hour eight hundred and ninety four one Shawn straight ahead.
Alito wrote a pretty fiery descent, saying that the court
issued what the court issue is unprecedented legally questionable relief
without giving the lower courts a chance to rule, without
hearing from the opposing party. Within eight hours of receiving
the application would do be his factual support for its
(11:04):
order without providing any explanation for their order, and went
on to say, I refused to join the Court's order
because we had no good reason to think, under the circumstances,
issuing an order at midnight was necessary or appropriate. He
went on to say, and I don't think he was
wrong in his rebuke.
Speaker 7 (11:24):
He was not wrong in his rebuke. And I think
that's I think the story here, and I think is
what we'll see unfold. But there is a dividing line
right in the quote conservative or Republican appointed block of
the Court. And you saw that unfold here. And look,
and we saw it last week in that five to
four ruling that went our way, but you saw that
(11:44):
Amy Cony Barrett went the other way in the four Like,
there's a dividing line here, and I think Thomas and
Alito are getting it right. But again, I want to
and I don't mean to dwell on it, but I
want everybody to take away what we're dealing with at
this moment in history. And I say, like, you know, Sean,
like I'm very much a believer we need that ballance
(12:06):
of powers. Congress needs to assert itself. Youve got to
respect the court's role. But here we've got the commander
in chief who's at his maximum in the authority that
he has under the Constitution to defend our country, to
ensure safety. And we're not talking about American citizens here,
and we're not talking about taking somebody and convicting them
(12:27):
under for a crime without due process. We're talking about
a president who removed an individual who had a court
order to remove him to a foreign country, take him
and send it back to his foreign country, his home,
and say that's where you're going to go. And now
you've got court saying, well, I don't know if we
can do that, or that we've got these Oh you
(12:48):
can't do this for some broad class of people. Well,
where was the court when Joe Biden was abusing our
law by declaring a class of people could be parolled
into the United States with an app jumping literally millions
of people, including murderers of Joscelyn nungraat Sean. I'm not
going to put up with it and not allow them
to twist this all around.
Speaker 1 (13:09):
And I get let me ask you this, because let's
go back, because this is the new radicalized democratic party. Well,
let's go back and play Hillary Clinton on the issue
of deporting illegal immigrant criminals.
Speaker 9 (13:23):
I think we got to have tough conditions. Tell people
to come out of the shadows. If they've committed a crime,
deport them, no questions asked, They're gone. If they've been
working and are law abiding, we should say, here are
the conditions for you staying. You have to pay a
stiff fine because you came here illegally. You have to
pay back taxes, and you have to try to learn English,
(13:45):
and you have to.
Speaker 8 (13:46):
Wait in line.
Speaker 1 (13:49):
What happened to that party?
Speaker 7 (13:51):
Well, I would note that there is a lot of
those examples. You point. That clip from Hillary is a
good one. I'm in Austin, Texas. Barbara Jordan, a renowned Democrat.
He was on one of the committees talking about our
need to secure the border. Of Chuck Schumer. You can
go find dozens of quotes about what we need to
do to secure the border. Again, this has all now
been politicized, and again they're doing it at the time,
(14:12):
and Senator Van Holliday is like the poster chob right
now and now we've got others. I'm told that speaker,
I mean, I'm sorry, Democrat majority leader Jeffares is going
to be heading down Tel Salvador. They are doubling down, Okay,
they are doubling down and believing that they should be
backing individuals who are affiliated with dangerous criminal organizations that
(14:34):
are pumping fedol and drugs in our communities, pumping dangerous
actors in our communities. And that's the current modern Democratic
Party now seany you know, there's forty seven people that
were arrested near Austin, Texas about ten days ago. If
you saw that story, forty seven trend dan Agua people.
I guess twenty five were affiliated with TDA, and then
there was others that happened about a mile from my house, okay,
(14:58):
in southwest of Austin, Texas. This is real, and it
is pervasive, and it is a direct consequence of Democrats
who do not care about the rule of law. Don't
let them hide. That is not directed to you, but
for everybody listening. Don't let democrats pretend that they're for
the rule of law here. They're not.
Speaker 1 (15:14):
Well, they're not in any way. Well, we're going to
continue to follow it, I mean, but yeah, Texas has
been on the front lines of a lot of this,
and you know, but for people like you and and
Ted Cruz and Governor Abbott, you know, Texas would be
in a lot worse shape. And Governor Abbit Governor DeSantis
is sending illegals to sanctuary cities and states and areas.
(15:36):
I think was a stroke of genius on their part. Anyway,
we appreciate your time, Chip Royd. Thank you. Eight hundred
and nine four one Shawn is a number if you
want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 3 (15:51):
The one thing you can always count on.
Speaker 1 (15:55):
Sean Hannity is back on the radio right twenty five
until the top of the hour. Eight hundred and nine
to four one Shawn is our number if you want
to be a part of the program. Uh now, congratulations again.
The winner of our tesla contest is Verlin s from
Westlake Village in California. And my understanding is this individual
(16:17):
has been gotten in touch with and we'll pick the
tesla of their choice. Where I want to thank you,
say thank you to everyone for participating and h you know,
maybe we'll do other contests in the future. I haven't
thought about it too much yet, but so far, but
I will look. Israel still under attack, you see what's
going on in the Middle East. The world's going to
have to make a decision soon on Iran. They should
(16:41):
be forced by the world to dismantle the nuclear program.
They we must insist on anywhere, any place, anytime, inspections.
I don't think they're going to go along with either
one of those things, and that will basically leave the
world with two choices. Do nothing and allow the mulls
in a ram with their radicalism to have nuclear weapons,
(17:03):
or choice number two is the world's got to see
the importance that that radicalism could lead to a modern
day holocaust, and it's a risk that we can't take.
I know other people have different views. I have no
interest in starting a conflict or war if they'd be
willing to dismantle their weapons program programs knowing that what
(17:25):
the inevitable response is going to be though would be
probably be ideal. Does it increase the risk, Yeah, it
does to countries in the region, et cetera. But I
think we've got to prepare for worst case scenario. But
in the meantime, Israel still under attack and their missile
fire is resumed, you have tens and tens of thousands
(17:46):
of displaced people and these terrorists are just committed to
wiping Israel off the map, and we've seen nothing but
death and destruction. And we hope you'll join all of
us here on Team Hannity in this show and help
the people of Israe as they fight for the very survival.
One of the best ways to do that is to
partner with us and the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews.
(18:08):
Whatever gift you can give today is going to help
provide security essentials like bomb shelters, flack jackets, full of
proof vests, armored security vehicles, ambulances, humanitarian assistants of every kind. Anyway,
there's no better time right now with the Passover Easter
season in freshen our memories as we celebrate Israel's historic
(18:30):
deliverance and birth of a nation. Now, there's two ways
you can donate. You can call eight eight eight four
eight eight IFCJ eight eight eight four eight eight, IFCJ online.
They have a website. It's one word support, IFCJ dot org.
That's SUPPORTIFCJ dot org two day. All right, let's get
to our busy phones. Let us say hi to David
(18:52):
in San Diego Coco Radio. What's up, David, How are
you glad you called sir?
Speaker 8 (18:58):
Hi? Sean, thanks a long time listener, first time call her.
A little bit nervous here, but outdo lett.
Speaker 1 (19:04):
Now you're talking to friends. Let not your heartbeat trouble.
Do you sound great? What's going on?
Speaker 2 (19:08):
Thank you?
Speaker 8 (19:08):
Sean. Yes, I'm a retired immigration officer, did thirty plus
years combined I N S and CBP, and I just
wanted to sound off a little bit on this Van
Holland situation. I was watching it last week and I
was like, okay, I can't I can't stay quiet Moore.
I got to try to call Sean here, and the
reason is sound. He starts off by saying I'm going
to go down there and I'm going to bring him back,
(19:29):
and I'm like, no, you're not okay. I taught immigration
law for several years and the only possible way for
him to come back would be if the Trump administration
authorized a parole, they bring him back, which of course
not all hinges on whether or not El Salvador wants
to release him, which doesn't look like they want to.
But even if they did, he comes back. He doesn't
(19:49):
just get off the plane and say hi, everybody, I'm
back and go back to you know, picnicking and stuff
like that. No, he goes into detention with ice, he
awaits this hearing that they say they want him to
have hearing, and he gets sort of removed again. So
it's all kind of pointless. And the only thing in contention,
it's not that he's a gang member or a criminal
or whatnot. That judge agreed with that. All the judge
(20:11):
said was, yes you're a gang member. Yes you're removable.
However you fear going back to your home country due
to gang affiliations or whatnot. So that's the only issue
at hand. But that's even ridiculous because asylum political protection
only relates to race, religion, nationality, membership, and a social
group or political opinion. I don't think being in a
(20:32):
gang qualifies you for that.
Speaker 1 (20:33):
Listen again, I go to Democrats want to die on
this hill. And you know, when Van Holland was asked
this weekend point blank if this guy's a member of
MS thirteen, he won't answer that question. And there are
some Democrats, not many of them, warning their own party
against making a martyr out of this guy. And this trip,
(20:56):
by the way, it was an interesting Logan Act analysis.
I think it was on foxnews dot com where this
trip might violate laws that liberals used as a pretext
for Michael Flynn in the probe against him. I wonder
if that'll happen there. But you know, if this is
the hill they want to die on standing up for,
you know, somebody that two courts have identified as an
(21:19):
MS thirteen gang member, then then let them be that party.
You know, there was an interview David Hogg was on
with our friend Ryan's previous and he just said, you know,
and by the way, this guy is now championing, as
we discussed earlier, you know that the Democratic Party needs
to primary anybody that's not hardcore radical left. And he's saying, well,
(21:44):
these Democrats are asleep at the wheel. They're not AOC,
they're not Jasmine Crockett. And it doesn't get any worse
than if you're defending Harvard and the PROHOMAUS wing that
is there, and you're traveling to Al Salvador to defend
MS gang MS team gang members. It really doesn't get
worse than that. And you're championing the right of men
(22:05):
to play women's sports. That is the Democratic Party today.
So if this is the path that they have chosen,
I just say, just let them.
Speaker 10 (22:13):
Let them.
Speaker 1 (22:14):
When somebody's self destructing, don't get in the way. That's
kind of a rule. Anyway, David, you didn't sound nervous
at all. You did great. We appreciate the call. Jim
in the Free State of Florida. What's up, Jim? How
are you, sir?
Speaker 2 (22:26):
Hey Sean, how are you doing today?
Speaker 1 (22:27):
I'm good man, what's going on?
Speaker 8 (22:29):
Hey?
Speaker 10 (22:29):
Was watching your show a few nights a day, like
I do every night, and wanted to tell you how
awesome and great job you did with Taylor Relyins Lorenz
excuse me?
Speaker 1 (22:41):
Former New York Times Dailyb's Washington Post US. Yeah.
Speaker 10 (22:45):
Liberal, Yeah, I looked her up and she's just as
cooo coo as a shooter is I got so working?
Speaker 1 (22:52):
Well, I wouldn't say that. I mean, she's not out
shooting people. However, this glorification again of Luigi Mangioni, and
this glorification of Hamas and this this you know, dying
on the hill of defending the rights that don't exist
for illegal immigrants that have gang associations. That that's your
(23:13):
modern liberal, left wing, radicalized party. And she just represents
it well. I noticed she wouldn't answer my question though, and.
Speaker 8 (23:21):
That's what got me worked.
Speaker 10 (23:22):
If I got some worked up, I my beer my
TV and spilled my beer and broke my TV.
Speaker 1 (23:26):
It was you spilled you a bit. Well, that's not
good about it. If I'm causing you to spill your
beer and break your TV, that's not good.
Speaker 7 (23:33):
It wasn't you, it was her.
Speaker 1 (23:36):
That's funny.
Speaker 10 (23:37):
It's saddening that in the United States of America that
there's people that are okay with someone being shot.
Speaker 7 (23:43):
Down in cold blood.
Speaker 10 (23:44):
It's not good.
Speaker 1 (23:45):
Listen. The fact that they are idolizing this assassination culture
and their silence is deafening. Praising a guy that you know,
killed the United accused of killing the United Healthcare CEO,
and cold blood. The people that are praising a terrorist
organization Hamas the people that remain silent as Tesla dealerships
(24:07):
are being shot at and vehicles set ablaze and charging
station set ablaze and calls for assassination. There was another
call for an assassination of Donald Trump over the weekend.
You know, if this is the culture of the left,
I mean, I don't know what to say. I mean,
do you have the George Mason PhD student asking when
(24:30):
must we kill Trump and his administration? When must we
kill them? You know, never in my life with political
disagreements have I ever thought of political violence. Now it's
kind of institutionalized. And then you have the fear factor,
and that is prominent Democrats won't even criticize their own
They're afraid to take a stand against something that basic,
(24:51):
fundamental and simple, and I think that just reflects the
dire state that they're in today. Anyway, Jim, don't spill
your beer, man, and don't break the I need you
to watch that every night. We have a great show
tonight at night. That's our busy phones eight hundred and
nine to four one, Shawn our number if you want
to be a part of the program. Chris and Michigan. Chris,
how are you glad you called?
Speaker 10 (25:11):
Right?
Speaker 2 (25:11):
I am great, Sean, It's an honor to talk to you. Sarah. Hey, Sean.
The other day you had a person on and they
mentioned the greade one Rush Limbaugh, and I got thinking,
I wonder what Sean would think that Rush would be
thinking now if Rush was still with us, what would
he be thinking about all the work that President Trump
is doing and actually making a real difference in this country.
Speaker 1 (25:35):
I think this would be a culmination of his life's work,
if you really want to know the truth, I mean,
what did Rush champion. He championed liberty and freedom and constitutionalism.
He championed limited government, greater freedom, dismantling of this this
massive bureaucracy that is built up, you know, under uniparty
(25:57):
rule for decades. He would love the conoclastic approach of
Donald Trump. He would mock and make fun of and
point out the hypocrisy of the left and they're embracing
violent culture and them melting down and losing. You know,
we've always known the left has been this way. They
at least try to create an appearance of normalcy, even
(26:19):
though we knew it didn't exist. They hid their radicalism
even though we all knew it existed. And I think
he would see this the way we're all seeing it,
as a very very heavy lift to fix things and
return to constitutional order, to make this the most consequential
presidency in one hundred, one hundred and fifty years. There's
not one thing Donald Trump is now tackling that's not
(26:41):
heavy and hard, and it's a heavy lift all the
way across the board, and I think he'd be there
every day, you know, championing the success. And I know
that the you know, if we do this right, America
will be richer, more prosperous, more free than as ever
been in our lifetime. And as Reagan admonished us, freedom
(27:04):
is but one generation away from extinction. I think he
would also be all about the idea of preserving it
for future generations. We now run the risk of being
the first generation that hands off our country in far
worse shape than we inherited it. And so I think
everything from national security and defense, the next generation of weaponry,
(27:25):
securing our borders and deporting illegal immigrant criminals. I think
getting rid of woke every place everywhere. I think doze
in eliminating waste, fraud and abuse. I think energy dominance.
I think America's role in the world. We don't have
to be the world's policeman. However, America does have a
(27:45):
role advancing the cause of liberty and freedom. And it's
often a needle you have to thread. But his voice
is dearly missed. But this was his life's work. He
championed the freedom. And when you you limit the size
of government. You are emboldening and enabling the American people
to live free versus, for example, the Green New Deal,
(28:09):
which is guaranteed womb to the tomb, cradle to the grave.
You know, promises that will always fail, They'll be unfulfilled promises.
You end up the same way. No matter what name,
whatever what manifestation it comes in, the guarantees will be there,
They'll never materialize, just like our educational system has failed.
(28:31):
Law and order has failed too many people in this country.
Obamacare has failed too many people in this country. Social
Security medicares headed towards insolvency in this country because government
never fulfills their promises. And then you end up in
the end you have unfulfilled promises and more poverty. And
(28:51):
then you have to calculate how much freedom you gave
up in the name of false security. And that's fundamentally
you know, the crossroads America is at right now, and
it will America choose freedom? Will America have the stomach
to stick with Trump? And we will Trump voters have
the stomach to stick with him, you know, to to
push to to break this stranglehold that the the bureaucratic,
(29:17):
institutionalists and establishment types have have so desperately been clinging
onto like manna from heaven, and a lot of Republicans
I haven't having problems with it as well, because they
too have been institutionalized this This is our opportunity to
fundamentally restructure government into the original intent and purpose of
(29:39):
our framers and founders.
Speaker 2 (29:40):
In my view, well, you know, Sean, I appreciate everything
that you do, but I gotta be ho there's times
I really missed the Golden IV and the wis Mike
that came from listen.
Speaker 1 (29:52):
I'm part of our club, you know. I said at
the time when Rush passed that nobody, nobody can replace
Babe Ruth. You just can't. And I think Rush would
want all of us to raise our game, do our part,
do a little more, and knowing that he gave us
a very good educational foundation for this battle, this fight
(30:13):
and frankly the moment we're now living in, because this
moment is critical. We're at a crossroads for the country
and I think I think we have the opportunity of
a lifetime. I really do. I've never been more optimistic
that America has the opportunity to write this ship and
return to America to its. It's founding ideals and principles
(30:35):
that we know work. Freedom works, belief in the individual works.
And you know, it's just it's just enacting those policies.
Anytime we've ever enacted the policies of liberty and freedom.
I don't care if it's Reagan, I don't care if
it's Trump. They always work. Anyway. I hope that answers
your question. But yes, we miss him dearly, and you know,
(30:58):
and we're also I'll find myself thankful that you know,
we had him as a foundation. Just on a personal note,
I mean, he paved the way for all of us
in new media, all of us. And you know, he
came on the scene there were two hundred plus news
talk stations around the country. Now it's the number one
format in radio. You know, we're now we're on seven
(31:18):
hundred and fifty radio stations. He made it easier for
those of us to follow, and that includes podcasters, that
includes social media, that includes you know, other outlets and
other means of communication. So that you know, that's why
the legacy state run legacy media mob is dead in
my view. Anyway, appreciate you call my friend. We'll always
miss him. He's in our hearts, and I know he's
(31:40):
looking down on us and hoping we get this right.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy And Charlamagne Tha God!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Decisions, Decisions
Welcome to "Decisions, Decisions," the podcast where boundaries are pushed, and conversations get candid! Join your favorite hosts, Mandii B and WeezyWTF, as they dive deep into the world of non-traditional relationships and explore the often-taboo topics surrounding dating, sex, and love. Every Monday, Mandii and Weezy invite you to unlearn the outdated narratives dictated by traditional patriarchal norms. With a blend of humor, vulnerability, and authenticity, they share their personal journeys navigating their 30s, tackling the complexities of modern relationships, and engaging in thought-provoking discussions that challenge societal expectations. From groundbreaking interviews with diverse guests to relatable stories that resonate with your experiences, "Decisions, Decisions" is your go-to source for open dialogue about what it truly means to love and connect in today's world. Get ready to reshape your understanding of relationships and embrace the freedom of authentic connections—tune in and join the conversation!